IMPLEMENTING RECIPROCAL TEACHING METHOD IN IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY
Abstract
This research was designed to improve the students’ reading comprehension in English through the implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Method. The research employed a collaborative classroom action research design in which the researcher and the collaborative teacher worked together in preparing a suitable procedure of Reciprocal Teaching Method, designing the lesson plan, determining of the criteria of success, implementing the action, observing, and doing reflections. The subjects of this research were 40 students of Grade XI BHS 2 at MA. Nurul Jadid Problolinggo in the academic year 2019/2020. The data of this research were obtained through (1) observation sheet, to obtain information about teacher’s and the students’ activities and performance during the implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Method, (2) quiz, to identify whether the students had made progress in reading comprehension, and (3) questionnaire, to get information from the students whether the strategy applied could motivate the students to actively involve during the teaching and learning process. The result of the research showed that the Reciprocal Teaching Method in the teaching-learning of reading comprehension was effective in improving the students’ reading comprehension. The improvement was indicated by the increase of the students’ average score throughout the cycle of action that was 72.63 in the preliminary study; 79.88 in the test of Cycle 1. Besides, students were motivated and active in the class using the method in terms of learning to work together and to help each other in a group with different competence, which was showed by the result of their works.Downloads
References
Best. J.W.. 1981. Research in Education. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Bond, G.L., Tinker, M.A. & Wasson, B.W. 1979. Reading Difficulties: Their Diagnosis and Correction (4th Ed.). London: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Brown, H.D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Addison Wesley.
Burns, A., Solomon, N. & Hood, S. 1996. Focus on Reading (New Edition). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Djiwandono, Soenardi M. 1996. Tes Bahasa dalam Pengajaran. FPBS-IKIP Malang : ITB Bandung.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.
Huda, N. 1999. Language Learning and Teaching. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Publisher.
Indrayani. N. 2005. The Implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Method for the Teaching of ESP at the Biology Department of the State University of Malang (A Case Study). Malang: Unpublished Thesis.
Leipzig, Diane Henry. 2001. What is Reading? WETA. (Online). URL: http://http://www.readingrockets.org/article/352. (Accessed: 2007, June 14th).
McNiff, J. 1992. Action Research Principle and Practice. New York: Chapman and Hall Inc.
Roe, Betty D., Barbara D. Stoodt and Paul C. Burns. 1995. Secondary School Reading Instruction: The Content Areas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Sulistyo, G. H. 2011. Reading For Meaning. Malang: Pustaka Kaiswaran Press.
Zakiya, L.F.. 2008. Improving Reading Comprehension on the Fourth Semester English Students of Islamic University of Malang Using Reciprocal Teaching. Malang: Unpublished Thesis.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)