MODEL OF ENGLISH LEARNING BASED ON COLLABORATIVE THEORY TO IMPROVE INDONESIAN’ SPOKEN COMMUNICATION ABILITY
Abstract
This study aims at findings whether collaborative method can improve students' spoken communition or not. This study use quasi experimental design with Posttest-Only, Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. The sample of this research were student’s of State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Palu. The instrument in this research was speaking English test ability. The tests were carried out in five times with different learning themes. Data analysis was performed by descriptive statistics and inference and presented in the form of percentages, frequency, min and statistical analysis in t test comparison (t-test) and Pearson correlation test. The researcher finds distribution of scores for the students’ spoken communication ability posttest is normal and variance-covariance for the dependent variables is homogeneous across the independent variables. The researcher finds a significant difference between the experimental class taught by a learning model of three theories collaboration and controclass taught by conventional learning model. The result of students] spoken communication ability on first test had higher compared second test. Similarly, also with the students’spoken communication abilities between the second tests with the third test, the third test with the fourth test, and the fourth test with the fifth test was very significant. The researcher also finds increased English spoken communication ability in experimental class. Improvement of spoken communication is due to model of learning English based on collaborative theory
Downloads
References
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. (2010). Language, Culture, and Education, A Portrait of contemporary Indonesia. Bandung. Ning Devices. Andira.
Azis, E. Aminuddin. (2006). Indonesia English: what’s de tuh?, dalam jurnal TEFLIN. www.trflin-indonesia.org
Brinner, J. (1999). Postmodernism and Constructivism. http://curriculum.calstatela.edu/faculty/psparks/theorists/htm.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2008). Prinsip Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Jakarta: Kedutaan besar Amerika Serikat di Jakarta dan Pearson Inc.
Budiningsih, A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Danic M,Orchovacki T,Stapic Z.(2000) .Introducing CaCM: toward new students collaboration model. Pavlinska: Faculty of Organization and Informatics University of Zagreb.
Dillenbourg, P., (1999). “Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches,” (Advances in Learning and Instruction Series), New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
Durand, C. X. (2006). If it’s not in English, it’s not worth reading! Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(1), 44–60.
Ertmer, P.A., & Newby, T.J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72.
Fatihi, A.R. (2003). The Role of Needs Analysis in ESL Program Design” South Asian Language Review. 13 (1&2) 39-59.Available at http://salr.net/documents/fatihi.pdf.[]september 20th,2007).
Ferire, Paulo. (2008). Pendidikan kaum Tertindas, Jakarta: LP3ES,
Gall Meredith D, Gall Joyce P, and Borg. (2003).Educational Research. Boston. Pearson Education, Inc.
Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English. London: The British Council.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from www.britishcouncil.org/files/documents/learning-research-english-next.pdf
Hendryanti, R. (2007). Materials Development of an EFL Reading Courseware for 8th grade students. Unpublished master’s degree thesis, English Education ProgramGraduate School, Indonesia Institute of Education.
Jenkins, E. W. (2000). Constructivism in school science education: Powerful model or the most dangerous intellectual tendency? Science & Education, 9, 599-610.
Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational Research: Quantitative and Qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Company.
Joyce, B & Marsha Weil. (2000). Metode of Teaching. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS Third Edition. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl.
Kellem, H. 2009. “Principles for Developing Oral Fluency in the Classroom”. JALT Journal 33 (1): 9-11
Kim, C., & Hatton, N. (n.d.). Cognitive theory and curriculum application. Retrieved January 21, 2014, from http://www.umm.maine.edu:300/education/students/curriculumDesign/Hatton.htm.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Retrieved from http://sdkrashen.com/SL_Acquisition_and_Learning/SL_Acquisition_and_Learning.pdf.
Mubarak, Ahmad Zaky, (2011). Model Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Lisan .Studi Pengembangan Kurikulum. Unpublished Dissertation. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Murphy, D.F. (1985). “Evaluation in Language Teaching: Assesment Accountability and Awareness”. In J.C. Alderson (Ed), Evaluation, Lanchaster Practical Papers in English Language Education 6 (pp: 1- 17). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Riyandari, Angelika.(2006). Challenges in Implementing Competency-based English Language Teaching at Institute Level Journal TEFLIN di www.tefli-indonesia.org.
Rumelhart, D.E. (1975). Notes on a Schema for Stories. In D.G. Bobrow and A Collins (ed). Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press.
Savignon, S.J. (2002). Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching. New Haven &London: Yale Institute Press.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Web: http://GerryStahl.net/elibrary/global.
Tonkin, H. (2003). Language and Society. http://www.globaled.org/issues/178F.pdf. [June 9, 2015].
Wiersma, W. (2000). Research Method in Education: An introduction. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Yahaya, Azizi.et.al. (2005). Psikologi Kognitif.Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)