PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TERHADAP KASUS IMUNITAS NEGARA MELALUI ICJ (INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE) / MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL

  • Julianto Jover Jotam Kalalo Universitas Musamus Merauke

Abstract

Mahkamah Internasional sebagai tempat penyelesaian sengketa internasional yang terbesar diharapkan mampu untuk menjembatani penyelesaian sengketa antar Negara anggotanya. Dengan fungsinya   sebagai organisasi internasional yang melindungi perdamaian dan keamanan dunia. Penyelesaian sengketa  yurisdiksi  negara dalam kasus Imunitas Negara pada hakekatnya menekankan upaya secara damai dalam penyelesaian sengketa negara anggotanya. Keputusan Mahkamah  Internasional dapat diartikan sebagai suatu kepastian yang terdapat di dalam peraturan hukum internasional yang menentukan bagaimana hubungan hukum antara kedua negara yang berperkara di Mahkamah  Internasional dimana ketentuan hukum internasional yang dikeluarkan oleh hakim Mahkamah Internasional yang menentukan penyelesaian persoalan sengketa negara tersebut.

International Court of Justice as the largest international dispute resolution expected to be able to facilitate the settlement of disputes among member States. With its function as an international organization that protects world peace and security. Settlement of disputes jurisdiction in the case of the State Immunity substantially greater emphasis on the peaceful settlement of disputes in its member countries. International Court's decision can be interpreted as an assurance contained in the rules of international law that determines how the legal relationship between the two countries litigants in the International Court of Justice in which the rules of international law issued by the International Court of Justice judges who determine the state dispute settlement issues.

References

Ade Maman Suherman, 2003. Organisasi Internasional & Integritas Ekonomi Regional Dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Globalisasi, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia)

Antonio Cassese, 2005. International Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press: New York.

Black’s Law Dictionary, 2004. 8th Edition

Declaration on principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the United Nations Charter 1970. Dapat di download di: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/2625(XXV)

Hans Kelsen. 1956. Principles of International Law. Reinhart & Company Press

J. G. Starke. 2010. Pengantar Hukum Internasional 1. Cetakan X. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta,

J.G. Starke, 1977. An Introduction to International Law. 8th Edition. Butterworths: London

Martin Dixon, 1996. Textbook on International Law. 3rd Edition. Blackstone Press Limited: Britain

Robert Jennings & Arthur Watts, 1996. Oppenheim’s International Law. 9th Edition. Longman: London.

Rosalyn Higgins. 1994. Problems and Process; International Law and How to Use it. Oxford University Press: United Kingdom

Sefriani, 2010. Hukum Internasional: Suatu Pengantar. Cetakan I. PT Rajagrafindo Persada: Jakarta

Statute of International Court of Justice, San Fransisco, 1945 [ICJ StatuteBoer Mauna. 2008. Hukum Internasional; Pengertian Peranan Dan Fungsi Dalam Era Dinamika Global. Edisi II. Cetakan II. PT Alumni:Bandung

Sumaryo Suryokusumo,1987. Organisasi Internasional,Jakarta: UI-Press

United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property 2004

Published
2016-12-01
How to Cite
Kalalo, J. J. J. (2016). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TERHADAP KASUS IMUNITAS NEGARA MELALUI ICJ (INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE) / MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 3(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v3i2.2818
Section
Volume 3 Nomor 2 Desember 2016
Abstract viewed = 2039 times