Pre-Trial in Indonesia: Why it Should be Reformed
Abstract
This study aims to find reasons why pretrial institutions are no longer relevant and must be immediately renew in Indonesian criminal procedural law. This article was compiled using the normative legal method. The study was conducted by examining the legislation, legal literature and doctrines related to pretrial. This study also uses three approaches, namely the statutory approach, the historical approach, and the conceptual approach. The results of the study show that pretrial reform in Indonesian criminal procedural law is important to be carried out immediately, Considering the many shortcomings that pre-trial institutions currently have, such as limited authority in the scope of the pre-adjudication stage which makes pre-trial far behind the models of similar institutions in various countries, and the absence of control or supervision over other crucial matters, such as determining whether evidence is obtained. in a legal way or not. Therefore, through the formation of a new criminal procedural law with pre-trial institutions changing their form to Commissioner Judges or Preliminary Examining Judges with a more active nature, it is hoped that human rights and citizen rights can be realized in the judicial process, as well as to achieve due process of law such as that is aspired to. The pros and cons of legal certainty and the principle of legality related to the decision of the constitutional court that expands the authority and broadly interprets several matters related to pretrial and criminal procedural law will be answered through the establishment or ratification of a new KUHAP with a pretrial institution that changes its form as a Commissioner Judge or Preliminary Examining Judge with more active nature.
References
Books:
Aristeus, Syprianus. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Tentang Perbandingan Antara Penyelesaian Putusan Praperadilan Dengan Kehadiran Hakim Komisaris Dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: BPHN- Departemen Hukum dan HAM.
Eddyono, Supriadi Widodo dan Erasmus Napitupulu. (2014). Prospek Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam Pengawasan Penahanan Dalam Rancangan KUHAP. Jakarta: Insitute for Criminal Justice Reform. Accesed from https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/HPP-dan-Penahanan-dalam-R-KUHAP.pdf.
Hamzah, Andi. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hamzah, Andi dan RM Surachman. (2014). Pre-Trial Justice Discretionary Justice Dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2012). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2012). Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga.
TIM ICJR. (2014). Praperadilan di Indonesia: Teori, Sejarah dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Praperadilan-di-Indonesia.pdf
Loqman, Loebby. (1987). Pra-Peradilan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia.
Lovina dan Sustira Dirga. (2022). Judicial Scrutiny Melalui Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam RKUHAP. Jakarta: Institute Criminal Justice Reform. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Judicial-Scrutiny-melalui-Hakim-Pemeriksa-Pendahuluan-dalam-RKUHAP.pdf
Maroni. (2018). Wajah Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Aura Publishing.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group
Pangaribuan, Luhut. (2005). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Djambatan
Remmelink. Jen. (2003). Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Ed. 1. Cet. 16. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Tanusubroto, S. (1983). Peranan Pra Peradilan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Journals:
Afandi, Fachrizal. (2016). Perbandingan Praktik Praperadilan dan Pembentukan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 28 (1), p. 94-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15868.
Ariyanto. (2014). Pelaksanaan Upaya Paksa Terhadap Anggota POLRI Pelaku Tindak Pidana di Wilayah Hukum Polres Jayapura Kota. Legal Pluralism: 4 (2). p.275-296. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229022295.pdf
Hartono, Dodik, Maryanto, Djauhari. (2018). Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Polda Jateng. Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1 (1). p. 53-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2564
Iswantoro, Wahyu. Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim dan Implikasi Terhadap Perkembangan Praperadilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik) 4, No. 1 (2018): 17.
Latifah, Marfuatul. Perlukah Mengatur Prinsip Exclusionary Rules of Evidence dalam RUU Hukum Acara Pidana? (Should We regukate Exclusionary Rule Principle in The Criminal Procedural Bill?). Jurnal Negara Hukum: Vol. 12, No. 1, 2012. p. 101-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v12i1.2123
Rozi, Fachrul. "Sistem Pembuktian dalam Proses Persidangan pada Perkara Tindak Pidana." Jurnal Yuridis UNAJA, vol. 1, no. 2, 2018, pp. 19-33, doi:10.5281/jyu.v1i2.486.
Robert M. Pitler, The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Revisited and Shepardized, 56 Cal. L. Rev. 579 (1968). Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol56/iss3/2
Parikesit, Iqbal. Eko Soponyono, (2017). Tinjauan tentang Objek Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal 6 (1), p. 1-60. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.15663
Rahmadi, Aji. (2018). Penetapan Tersangka Baru Dalam Lembaga Praperadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor: 24/pid.Pra/2018/Pn.JKT.SEL). Jurnal Hukum Jurisprudence, 8 (2). p. 74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v8i2.6977
Ramiyanto. (2015). Sah Atau Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Objek Gugatan Praperadilan (Kajian Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel). Jurnal Yudisia 8 (2). p. 167 – 189. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v8i2.51
Riki Perdana Raya Waruwu, Praperadilan Pasca Putusan MK. Accessed from https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/artikel/Praperadilan%20Pasca%204%20Putusan%20MK.pdf.
Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa; and Priambudi, Zaki (2021) "Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System," Indonesia Law Review: Vol. 11: No. 2, Article 3. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.2
Yuliarta, I Gede. (2009). Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Perspektif Kini Dan Masa Mendatang Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Journal Law Reform, 5 (1), p.1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v5i1.667
Copyright (c) 2023 Fitriah Faisal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
- to retain copyright and grant to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
- permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal
- continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA license
- receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
