Juridical Analysis of the Tradition of Consuming Tritis (Case Study of the Muslim Community in Karo from 2011 to 2022)

  • Fahri Roja Sitepu Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
    (ID)
  • Dhiauddin Tanjung Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
    (ID)
  • Akmaluddin Syahputra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
    (ID)
Keywords: Consumption of Tritis, MUI Fatwa, Halal Product Assurance Law, Muslim Karo Community.

Abstract

The Law on Consuming Tritis from the Perspective of the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) of North Sumatra Province No. 5 of 2011 Concerning the Law on Tritis and Law No. 33 of 2014 of the Republic of Indonesia Regarding Halal Product Assurance (Case Study of the Muslim Karo Community from 2011-2022) This journal explores the traditions of the Muslim Karo community in consuming tritis in relation to the implementation of the MUI North Sumatra Province Fatwa No. 5 of 2011, which discusses the legal status of consuming tritis. Tritis, a traditional food derived from undigested cow food processed with certain spices, holds significant cultural meaning for the Muslim Karo community. This study aims to explain the practice of consuming tritis in the Karo region and how these practices align with the religious guidelines provided by the MUI fatwa. Using an empirical juridical research approach and case study methodology, this research includes observations, interviews, and document studies. Through qualitative data analysis and deductive reasoning, this study examines the consumption habits of the Muslim Karo community and evaluates them based on the fatwa's provisions. The findings show that the tradition of consuming tritis is deeply embedded in Karo culture, influenced by long-held beliefs about the health benefits of tritis and the ease of obtaining its ingredients. However, the legal status of consuming tritis, as outlined by the MUI Fatwa No. 5 of 2011, states that the practice is haram because it derives from animal materials prohibited under Islamic law. The implementation of this fatwa has been inadequate due to a lack of religious knowledge, insufficient fatwa socialization, and deeply rooted cultural factors.

 

References

Abd.Hadi. 2010. Dasar-dasar Hukum Ekonomi Islam. CV. Putra Media Nusantara.
Abdurrahman Al-Jaziri. Fiqh ala Madzahib al-Arba’ah. Bandung: Pustaka Al Kautsar.
Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali. 2003. Benang Tipis antara Halal dan Haram. Jakarta: Qisthi Press.
Agustiono. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik Model Van Meter dan VanHorn. unja.ac.id, diakses 1 Agustus 2020.
Ahmad Muntaha. 2013. Pengantar Kaidah Fiqh Syafi‟iyah Penjelasan Nadhom Al-Fara‟id AlBahiyah. Kediri: Santri Salaf Press.
Beni Ahmad Saebeni. 2009. Ilmu Ushul Fiqh. Bandung : Pustaka Setia.
Departemen Agama RI. 2010. Alqur’an dan terjemahannya. Bandung: Syikma Examedia Arkanlema.
Fatwa MUI Sumatera Utara nomor 5 tahun 2011 tentang mengkonsumsi tritis.
Mardalis. 1993. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi aksara.
Muhtar Yahya Dan Fakhurrahman. 1986. Dasar-Dasar Pembinaan Hukum Fiqih Islam, Cet. 1. Bandung : PT.Al-Ma’rif.
Sukarno Wibowo Dan Dedi Supriadi. 2013. Ekonomi Mikro Islam. Bandung: Cv Pustaka Setia.
Sulaiman Ahmad Yahya Al-Faifi. 2013. Ringkasan Fikih Sunnah Sayyid Sabiq. Jakarta: AlKautsar.
Supranto, Nanda Limakrisna. 2011. Perilaku Konsumen Dan Strategi Pemasaran Untuk Memenangkan Persaingan Bisnis. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Thohir Luth. 2009. Antara Perut Dan Etos Kerja Dalam Perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Gema Insane Press.
Wahbah Zuhaili. Fiqh al-Islâm wa Adillatuh. Jakarta: Darul Fikr.
Yusuf al-Qardlawi. 1994. Al-Halal wa al-Haram fi al-Islam. Beirut : Al-Maktab al-Islami.
Zainal Arifin Zakaria. 2016. Tafsir Inspirasi. Medan: Duta Azhar.
Published
2024-06-29
How to Cite
Sitepu, F. R., Tanjung, D., & Syahputra, A. (2024). Juridical Analysis of the Tradition of Consuming Tritis (Case Study of the Muslim Community in Karo from 2011 to 2022). Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 11(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v11i1.47923
Section
Volume 11 Nomor 1 Juni 2024
Abstract viewed = 48 times