KEDUDUKAN KPK DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI THE NEW SEPARATION OF POWER (KRITIK ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI No. 36/PUU-XV/2017 dan No. 40/PUU-XV/2017)
Abstract
Abstract
The position of corruption eradication commision perspectives of new theory of Separation of powers, in fact in the constitutional system shows the Corruption Eradication Commission as an independent organ and can no longer be seated as an executive body, and is no longer relevant to classify a state institution on 3 (three) branches of power an sich, trias politica. In the above verses can re-run the power and authority of the previous institution on the executive family and diverted into quasi-judicial and quasi-legislative powers. Thus, it is no longer true that the argument that placed the Anti-Corruption Commission as an executive based on executive logic by looking at its judicial duties and functions.Keyword: Corruption Eradication Commision, constitutional system, the new separation of power
Abstrak
Kedudukan KPK Perspektif Teori The New Separation of Powers, pada faktanya dalam sistem ketatanegaraan, menunjukkan bahwa Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai independen organ dan tidak lagi dapat didudukkan sebagai lembaga eksekutif, serta tidak relevan lagi menggolongkan suatu lembaga negara pada 3 (tiga) cabang kekuasaan an sich, sebagaimana teori trias politica. Pada fakatnya diatas bahwa kelahiran komisi independen dapat menjalankan kekuasaan dan kewenangan lembaga sebelumnya pada rumpun eksekutif dan dialihkan menjadi lembaga independen. Bahkan tugas dan kewenangan komisi independen dapat saja bersifat quasi yudikatif dan quasi legislative. Jadi, tidak tepat lagi argumentasi yang mendudukkan Komisi Anti Korupsi sebagai eksekutif berdasarkan logika eksekutif dengan melihat sisi tugas dan fungsi yudisialnya.
Kata Kunci: KPK, Sistem Ketatanegaraan, dan the new separation of power
References
BUKU DAN JURNAL
Ackerman. Bruce, 2000. The New Separation of Powers, Journal Harvard Law Review vol. 113, Januari.
Adnan Jamal, 2011, Hakim Konstitusi: antara Penegakan Supremasi Konstitusi dan Anarkisme Konstitusi, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum AMANNA GAPPA, Vol. 19 Nomor 2, Juni 2011.
Baum. Lawrence, 2007, Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry, Paper for Workshop on Exploring the Judicial Mind, University of Virginia, March 30-31.
Denny Indrayana, 2016. Jangan Bunuh KPK: Kajian Hukum Tata Negara Penguatan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Intrans Publisihing, Malang,
F. Fox Jr. William, 2000. Understanding Administrative Law, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the Lexis Nexis Group.
Febridiansyah, 2014, Panduan Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.
Jimly Ashiddiqie, 2006. Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta
L. Selin. Jennifer, What Makes an Agency Independent?, Working Paper, Research Concentration: Executive Politics and Regulatory Policymaking.
Lisa Schultz Bressman & Robert B. 2010. Thompson, The Future of Agency Independenc, Journal of Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 3 number 3,
Nuno Garoupa and Tom Ginsburg, 2009, Judicial Audiences and Reputation: Perspectives from Comparative Law, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 451.
R. Asimow. Michael, 2014. Administrative Law, Foundation Press.
Skach. Cindy, 2007. The “newest ” Separation of Powers: Emipresidentialism, Journal I-CON, Volume 5, Number 1.
KONSTITUSI DAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 19/PUU-V/2007.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017.
Thailand's Constitution of 2014, constituteproject.org. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Februari 2018.
The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, http://www.dotr.gov.ph/images/front/GAD/issuances/1987constitution.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Februari 2018.
Zimbabwe's Constitution of 2013 (pdf), constituteproject.org. Vide as well (lihat juga)l, Transparency International Zimbabwe, http://tizim.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/faq6.pdf. Diaksesk pada tanggal 22 Februari 2018.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
- to retain copyright and grant to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
- permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal
- continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA license
- receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.