https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/adabiyah <p align="justify">The Journal has been published by the Faculty of Adab and Humanities of Alauddin State Islamic University, Makassar in 1997 and has been online since 2016. The main theme is Islamic Humanities studies with the emphasis on interdisciplinary and intertextuality approach. The scope of article discusses Qur'anic exegesis, living sunnah, Islamic law, Islamic philosophy, Islamic mysticism, theology, and/or integrated with humanities field of studies. The journal of Humanities and Islamic Studies provides the online collection of articles from 1997 up to now. The most updated information can be found on the website.</p> en-US <p><strong><strong>COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE STATEMENT</strong></strong></p> <p><strong>COPYRIGHT</strong><br>Jurnal Adabiyah&nbsp;is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restriction to their work. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, and print the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p> <p><strong>LICENSE TO PUBLISH</strong><br><strong>1. License</strong><br>The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.</p> <p><strong>2. Author’s Warranties</strong><br>The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).</p> <p><strong>3. User Rights</strong><br>Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content for any purpose, even commercially, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.</p> <p><strong>4. Co-Authorship</strong><br>If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the corresponding author warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this statement.</p> <p><strong>5. Miscellaneous</strong><br>Jurnal Adabiyah&nbsp;may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.</p> [email protected] (Nasrum) [email protected] (Chusnul Chatimah Asmad) Thu, 06 Feb 2025 03:26:42 +0000 OJS 3.1.2.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/adabiyah/article/view/52680 <p>This research examines and compares the perspectives of Stoicism and Al-Kindi on the concept of happiness. The investigation is warranted by the growing societal struggle with discontent, exacerbated by modern challenges such as rising mental health issues and weakened social bonds. While Stoicism has resurged as a popular framework for addressing these struggles, it has notable limitations—chiefly its neglect of the social and spiritual dimensions essential to holistic well-being. In contrast, Al-Kindi's ethical framework offers a compelling alternative, integrating intellectual, social, and spiritual elements into the pursuit of happiness. This research is a qualitative, comparative study within the field of philosophy, employing literature review and specific methodological components for analysis. The findings reveal that while Stoicism and Al-Kindi’s perspectives on happiness are distinct, they share core principles. Both reject material indulgence as the basis for happiness, emphasizing self-improvement through reason and morality. Stoicism defines happiness as a state of inner tranquility, achieved through mental discipline, self-regulation, and acceptance of fate. Al-Kindi, however, presents a more comprehensive view, framing happiness as an interplay of intellectual, moral, social, and spiritual dimensions.</p> <p><strong>الملخص</strong></p> <p>الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو دراسة ومقارنة وجهات نظر الرواقيين والكنديين حول السعادة. إن هذه القضية مهمة للفحص بسبب انتشار ظاهرة عدم الرضا الإنساني، والتي زادت في ظل التعقيدات الحديثة مثل مشاكل الصحة العقلية وضعف الروابط الاجتماعية. إن الفلسفة الرواقية، على الرغم من شعبيتها باعتبارها وجهة نظر للتغلب على عدم الرضا البشري، لها مع ذلك حدود صارخة - وخاصة إهمالها للأبعاد الاجتماعية والروحية. وقد برز الإطار الأخلاقي للكندي كبديل يدمج الأبعاد الفكرية والاجتماعية والروحية. هذا البحث بحث نوعي في مجال الفلسفة من نوع البحث المقارن. تم جمع البيانات في هذه الدراسة من خلال الدراسات الأدبية، وتم تحليلها باستخدام العناصر المنهجية في شكل الوصف، وتحليل اللغة، والتفسير، والترابط. وتظهر نتائج هذه الدراسة أن الرواقية والكندي لديهما وجهات نظر غنية ولكن مختلفة حول السعادة، مع بعض أوجه التشابه. يتفق كلاهما على أن السعادة لا تعتمد على الملذات المادية، بل على تطوير الذات من خلال العقل والفضيلة. يتم تعريف السعادة في وجهة النظر الرواقية على أنها حالة من الهدوء العقلي (الطمأنينة)، والتي يتم تحقيقها من خلال التمرين العقلي، وضبط النفس، وقبول المصير. أما الكندي فلديه رؤية أكثر تعددية الأبعاد. السعادة عند الكندي تشمل الأبعاد الفكرية والأخلاقية والاجتماعية والروحية. المعرفة هي المصدر الرئيسي للسعادة، لأنه من خلال المعرفة يستطيع الإنسان فهم الحقيقة والتقرب من الله.</p> <p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p> <p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan membandingkan perspektif Stoikisme dan Al Kindi tentang kebahagiaan. Persoalan ini penting untuk diteliti karena meluasnya fenomena ketidakpuasan manusia, yang telah meningkat di tengah kompleksitas modern seperti masalah kesehatan mental dan melemahnya ikatan sosial. Stoikisme, meskipun populer sebagai pandangan untuk mengatasi ketidakpuasan manusia, namun demikian memiliki keterbatasan yang mencolok—terutama pengabaiannya terhadap dimensi sosial dan spiritual. Kerangka etika Al-Kindi muncul sebagai alternatif, yang mengintegrasikan dimensi intelektual, sosial, dan spiritual. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif bidang filsafat dengan jenis penelitian komparatif. Data pada penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka, dan dianalisis menggunakan unsur metodis berupa deskripsi, analitika bahasa, interpretasi, dan koherensi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Stoisisme dan Al-Kindi memiliki pandangan yang kaya namun berbeda tentang kebahagiaan, dengan beberapa kesamaan. Keduanya sepakat bahwa kebahagiaan tidak tergantung pada kenikmatan material, melainkan pada pengembangan diri melalui rasio dan kebajikan. Kebahagiaan dalam pandangan Stoisisme didefinisikan sebagai keadaan jiwa yang tenang (<em>ataraxia</em>), yang dicapai melalui latihan mental, kendali diri, dan penerimaan terhadap takdir. Al-Kindi memiliki pandangan yang lebih multidimensional. Kebahagiaan menurut Al Kindi mencakup dimensi intelektual, moral, sosial, dan spiritual. Pengetahuan menjadi sumber utama kebahagiaan, karena melalui pengetahuan manusia dapat memahami kebenaran dan mendekatkan diri kepada Tuhan.</p> Shely Cathrin, Reno Wikandaru, Nizla Rohaya Copyright (c) 2025 Shely Cathrin, Reno Wikandaru, Nizla Rohaya https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/adabiyah/article/view/52680 Thu, 06 Feb 2025 03:24:46 +0000