Monitoring Anurans Diversity along Code River, Province of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Donan Satria Yudha Laboratory of Animal Systematics, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)
  • Wulan Rahmani Akmal Laboratory of Animal Systematics, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Rury Eprilurahman Laboratory of Animal Systematics, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Abstract

The research about frogs and toads diversity in the Code River, Province of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) had been done in 2012 (Yudha et al., 2013). Now, after five years passed, we conduct monitoring activities for updating its diversity and distribution. After five years, we consider that there are many changes along the river that influenced habitat condition for frogs and toads which live along and near the river. Some of the changes are unused land became human settlement or paddy fields and wasteland. The purpose of this research is to monitor the diversity of frogs and toads after five years along Code River. The method used was acoustic and visual encounter survey (VES). We have done total of 10 days of sampling. Each day we did two times sampling, during the day and night. Results show that the species number of frogs and toads found in 2012 were slightly higher compare to 2017. The frogs and toads on upstream part were diverse in 2017 compare to 2012 due to natural restoration of riparian vegetation occur on upstream. The frogs and toads on midstream part were less diverse in 2017 compared to 2012 due to increasing human activities near the river and less riparian vegetation. The frogs and toads on downstream part were also less diverse in 2017 compared to 2012 due to increasing human activities near the river and more household waste stuck on riparian vegetation. There was variation of anurans diversity after five years due to changing on physical condition of the river and human activities near the river.

References

Bibi F, and Ali Z. 2013. Measurement of diversity indices of avian communities at Taunsa Barrage Wildlife Sanctuary, Pakistan. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. vol 23(2): 469-474.

Burgin S, and Schell CB. 2005. Frog eggs: unique food source for leech Bassianobdella fusca. Acta Zoologica Sinica. vol 51(2): 349–353.

Crump ML, Scott Jr NJ. 1994. Visual encounter surveys. In measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. pp. 84–92.

Das M, Mallick BN, Dasgupta SC, Gomes A. 2000. A sleep inducing factor from common Indian toad (Bufo melanostictus, Schneider) skin extract. Toxicon. vol 38(9): 1267–1281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(99)00229-9.

Giovanelli JG, Haddad CF, Alexandrino J. 2008. Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil. Biological Invasions. vol 10(5): 585–590. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9154-5.

Iskandar DT. 1998. Amfibi Jawa dan Bali–Seri Panduan Lapangan. Bogor: Puslitbang LIPI. pp. 1–7.

Kargo WJ, Nelson F, Rome LC. 2002. Jumping in frogs: assessing the design of the skeletal system by anatomically realistic modeling and forward dynamic simulation. Journal of Experimental Biology. vol 205(12): 1683-1702.

Karraker NE, Fischer S, Aowphol A, Sheridan J, Poo S. 2018. Signals of forest degradation in the demography of common Asian amphibians. PeerJ. vol 6: e4220. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717%2Fpeerj.4220.

Kurniati H. 2003. Amphibians and reptiles of Gunung Halimun National Park, West Java, Indonesia. Cibinong: Research Center for Biology-LIPI.

Kurniati H. 2013. Distribusi kodok Ingerophrynus biporcatus (Gravenhorst, 1829) di Sulawesi. Warta Herpetofauna. vol 6(3): 8–9.

Kusrini MD. 2009. Pedoman penelitian dan survei amfibi di alam. Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Laufer G, Gobel N, Borteiro C, Soutullo A, Martínez-Debat C, de Sá RO. 2018. Current status of American bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus, invasion in Uruguay and exploration of chytrid infection. Biological invasions. vol 20(2): 285–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1540-z.

Mariano DOC, Messias MDG, Spencer PJ, Pimenta DC. 2019. Protein identification from the parotoid macrogland secretion of Duttaphrynus melanostictus. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases. vol 25: 1–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2019-0029.

Márquez R, and Eekhout XR. 2006. Advertisement calls of six species of anurans from Bali, Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Natural History. vol 40(9-10): 571–588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930600712129.

Muslim T, Sari UK, Yassir I. 2017. The dominant species of herpetofauna in the coal mining area at East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. vol 18(2): 773–779. doi: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d180250.

Muslim T, Rayadin Y, Suhardiman A. 2018. Habitat preference based on herpetofauna spatial distribution in Coal Mining Area of PT Singlurus Pratama, East Kalimantan. Agrifor. vol 17(1): 175–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.31293/af.v17i1.3361.

Neerati R, and Yanamala V. 2013. Protein patterns of parotoid gland extract and its secretion of Bufo melanostictus (Schneider) through urea-sds-page. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. vol 5(4): 734–736.

Pizzatto L, Child T, Shine R. 2008. Why be diurnal? Shifts in activity time enable young cane toads to evade cannibalistic conspecifics. Behavioral Ecology. vol 19(5): 990–997. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn060.

Reilly SM, Montuelle SJ, Schmidt A, Krause C, Naylor E, Essner Jr RL. 2016. Functional evolution of jumping in frogs: Interspecific differences in take‐off and landing. Journal of Morphology. vol 277(3): 379–393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20504.

Shine R. 2014. A review of ecological interactions between native frogs and invasive cane toads in Australia. Austral Ecology. vol 39(1): 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12066.

Soemardiono B, and Gusma AF. 2014. The Development of Code River area in Yogyakarta as a sustainable urban landscape asset acknowledging local traditional knowledge. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development. vol 2(4): 4–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.2.4_4.

Solikha DE, and Marfai MA. 2012. Perubahan morfologi sungai code akibat aliran lahar pasca erupsi gunungapi merapi tahun 2010. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia. vol 1(3): 240–245.

Subeno. 2018. Distribusi dan keanekaragaman herpetofauna di Hulu Sungai Gunung Sindoro, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan. vol 12(1): 40–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.34108.

Suprapto. 2015. Indeks keanekaragaman jenis ikan demersal di perairan tarakan. Bawal Widya Riset Perikanan Tangkap. vol 6(1): 47–53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/bawal.6.1.2014.47-53.

Türkmen G, and Kazanci N. 2010. Applications of various biodiversity indices to benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams of a national park in Turkey. Review of Hydrobiology. vol 3(2): 111–125.

Van Kampen PN. 2017. The Amphibia of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. Leiden: Forgotten Books Classic Reprint Series. p. 200.

Wulandari DR, Habibi M, Listyorini D. 2013. Observation of frog species in State University of Malang as a preliminary effort on frog conservation. Journal of Tropical Life Science. vol 3(1): 43–47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/jtls.3.1.%25x.

Yudha DS, Eprilurahman R, Andryani K, Trijoko T. 2013. Keanekaragaman Jenis katak dan kodok di sepanjang Sungai Code Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Berkala Ilmiah Biologi. vol 12(1): 17–25.

Published
2019-12-29
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed = 661 times