Estimation of Several Commercial, Phenotypic and Reproductive Traits' Performance, Using the Quantitative Genetic Method for Kamper Chicken Line

I Wayan Swarautama Mahardhika; Abiyyayumna Rif’at Chasnaurosyiqoh; Joseph Chohansandhika; Feren Putri Sholiha; Nurachmad Bagas Indriarto; Budi Setiadi Daryono

doi:10.24252/bio.v8i2.15648

I Wayan Swarautama Mahardhika Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Postgraduate Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada
(ID) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-3156
Abiyyayumna Rif’at Chasnaurosyiqoh Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada
(ID)
Joseph Chohansandhika Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada
(ID)
Feren Putri Sholiha Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada
(ID)
Nurachmad Bagas Indriarto Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada
(ID)
Budi Setiadi Daryono Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada
(ID) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0703-2123

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v8i2.15648

Abstract

In this study the genetic resource of Pelung chicken from Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia, was exploited. Pelung chicken has a higher body weight growth, unique meat flavor, and superior posture, compared with other indigenous breeds. Kamper chicken line selective breeding program was conducted, to increase the performance of Pelung breed by crossing with Layer Lohmann Brown-Classic. The Layer Lohmann Brown-Classic is an imported laying-type breed, which is widely known for its reproductive performance, based on the egg productivity. This study aims to use quantitative genetic method in estimating the commercial and reproductive traits' performance of Kamper chicken line. Based on commercial, phenotypic and reproductive traits, the progenies in Kamper chicken line have significant improvements, compared to the parental cross of Pelung and Layer Lohmann Brown-Classic. The quantitative genetic method was used in describing and underlying some phenomenon, in the selective breeding program. The results showed that the phenotypic and reproductive types of progenies in Kamper chicken, have significant improvements compared to the parental crossing of Pelung breed and Layer Lohmann Brown-Classic. Although quantitative genetic method is utilized in basic breeding program with significant precision and rapidness, it is only used in the preliminary study, for the advanced type. Therefore, the addition of quantitative trait loci (QTL), provide a more thorough genetic examination, and play a role in selective breeding program.

Author Biographies

I Wayan Swarautama Mahardhika, Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Postgraduate Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Master Student Faculty of Postgraduate Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Senior Researcher at Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Universitas Gadjah Mada

Abiyyayumna Rif’at Chasnaurosyiqoh, Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Undergraduate Student Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Junior Researcher Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding

Joseph Chohansandhika, Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Undergraduate Student Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Junior Researcher Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding

Feren Putri Sholiha, Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Undergraduate Student Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Junior Researcher Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding

Nurachmad Bagas Indriarto, Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Undergraduate Student Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Junior Researcher Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding

Budi Setiadi Daryono, Gama Ayam Research Team Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding Faculty of Biology Universitas Gadjah Mada

Head of Gama Ayam Research Team
Researcher Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding
Dean Faculty of Biology
Universitas Gadjah Mada

References

Ali M, Kuswanto K, Kustanto H. 2019. Phenomenon of inbreeding depression on maize in perspective of the Quran. Agrivita, Journal of Agricultural Science. vol 41(2): 385–393. doi: http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v41i2.2022.

Alvarez-Castro JM, Le Rouzic A, Andersson L, Siegel PB, Carlborg Ö. 2012. Modelling of genetic interactions improves prediction of hybrid patterns–a case study in domestic fowl. Genetics Research. vol 94(5): 255–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S001667231200047X.

Alwell JJS, Abdur-Rahman A, Chukwujindu NS. 2018. Heritability estimates of egg weight and eggshell weight in Ikenne, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific World. vol 6(1): 38–42. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijsw.v6i1.8677.

Anderson KE, Tharrington JB, Curtis PA, Jones FT. 2004. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of single comb white leghorn chickens and the relationship of egg shape to shell strength. International Journal of Poultry Science. vol 3(1): 17–19.

Bar-Zvi D, Lupo O, Levy AA, Barkai N. 2017. Hybrid vigor: The best of both parents, or a genomic clash?. Current Opinion in Systems Biology. vol 6: 22–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2017.08.004.

Bi H, Liu Z, Sun C, Li G, Wu G, Shi F, Liu A, Yang N. 2018. Brown eggshell fading with layer ageing: dynamic change in the content of protoporphyrin IX. Poultry Science. vol 97(6): 1948–1953. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey044.

Binur R, Pancoro A. 2017. Inbreeding depression level of post-larvae freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) from several hatcheries in Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. vol 18(1): 609–618. doi: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d180159.

Cheng HW. 2010. Breeding of tomorrow’s chickens to improve well-being. Poultry Science. vol 89: 805–813. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00361.

Diambra-Odi H. 2014. Tropical layer chicken management guide: A sustainable approach. Bloomington: Xlibris Publishing. pp 1–104.

Duman M, Şekeroğlu A, Yıldırım A, Eleroğlu H, Camcı Ö. 2016. Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. European Poultry Science. vol 80: 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2016.117.

Goto T, Ishikawa A, Nishibori M, Tsudzuki M. 2019. A longitudinal quantitative trait locus mapping of chicken growth traits. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. vol 294(1): 243–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-018-1501-y.

Harrisson KA, Magrath MJ, Yen JD, Pavlova A, Murray N, Quin B, Menkhorst P, Miller KA, Cartwright K, Sunnucks P. 2019. Lifetime fitness costs of inbreeding and being inbred in a critically endangered bird. Current Biology. vol 29(16): 2711–2717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.064.

Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A. 2016. Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. vol 31(12): 940–952. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005.

Henuk YL, Bakti D. 2018. Benefits of Promoting Native Chickens for Sustainable Rural Poultry Development in Indonesia. Talenta Conference Series: Agricultural and Natural Resources (ANR). vol 1(1): 69–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.32734/anr.v1i1.98.

Johnsson M, Henriksen R, Fogelholm J, Höglund A, Jensen P, Wright D. 2018. Genetics and genomics of social behavior in a chicken model. Genetics. vol 209(1): 209–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.300810.

Kabir MA, Islam MS, Datta RK. 2012. Egg morphometric analyses in chickens and some selected birds. University Journal of Zoology, Rajshahi University. vol 31: 85–87.

Katano T, Shimogiri T, Kawabe K, Okamoto S. 2011. Genetic diversity and population structure of Indonesian native chickens based on single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Poultry Science. vol 90(11): 2471–2478. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01450.

Kaeppler S. 2012. Heterosis: many genes, many mechanisms—end the search for an undiscovered unifying theory. International Scholarly Research Notices. vol 2012: 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/682824.

Lalev M, Mincheva N, Oblakova M, Hristakieva P, Ivanova I. 2014. Estimation of heterosis, direct and maternal additive effects from crossbreeding experiment involving two White Plymouth Rock lines of chickens. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. vol 30(1): 103–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1401103L.

Lien CY, Tixier-Boichard M, Wu SW, Chen CF. 2020. Identification of QTL and loci for egg production traits to tropical climate conditions in chickens. Livestock Science, vol 234: 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103980.

Luo C, Qu H, Ma J, Wang J, Li C, Yang C, Hu X, Li N, Shu D. 2013. Genome-wide association study of antibody response to Newcastle disease virus in chicken. BMC Genetics. vol 14(1): 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-42.

Mahardhika IWS, Daryono BS. 2019. Phenotypic performance of Kambro crossbreeds of female Broiler Cobb 500 and male Pelung Blirik Hitam. Buletin Veteriner Udayana. vol 11(2): 188–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2019.v11.i02.p12.

Manjula P, Park HB, Seo D, Choi N, Jin S, Ahn SJ, Heo KN, Kang BS, Lee JH. 2018. Estimation of heritability and genetic correlation of body weight gain and growth curve parameters in Korean native chicken. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. vol 31(1): 26–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0179.

Maulana B, Masy'ud B, Mardiastuti A. 2015. Identifikasi inbreeding pada jalak putih (Sturnus melanopterus Daudin 1800) di pusat penyelamatan Satwa Cikananga, Jawa Barat. Media Konservasi. vol 20(1): 21–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.20.1.%25p.

Mignon-Grasteau S, Chantry-Darmon C, Boscher MY, Sellier N, Chabault-Dhuit M, Le Bihan-Duval E, Narcy A. 2016. Genetic determinism of bone and mineral metabolism in meat-type chickens: A QTL mapping study. Bone Reports. vol 5: 43–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2016.02.004.

Mottet A, Tempio G. 2017. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World's Poultry Science Journal. vol 73(2): 245–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071.

Nietlisbach P, Keller LF, Camenish G, Guillaume F, Arcesee P, Reid JM, Postma E. 2017. Pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient explains more variation in fitness than heterozygosity at 160 microsatellites in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. vol 284(1850): 2016–2763. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2763.

Niknafs SH, Abdi H, Fatemi SA, Zandi MB, Baneh H. 2013. Genetic trend and inbreeding coefficients effects for growth and reproductive traits in Mazandaran indigenous chicken. Journal of Biology. vol 3(1): 25–31.

Nwenya JMI, Nwakpu EP, Nwose RN, Ogbuagu KP. 2017. Performance and heterosis of indigenous chicken crossbreed (Naked Neck x Frizzled Feather) in the humid tropics. Journal of Poultry Research. vol 14(2): 7–11.

Pekkala N, Knott KE, Kotiaho JS, Nissinen K, Puurtinen M. 2014. The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients. Evolutionary Applications. vol 7(9): 1107–1119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12145.

Perdamaian ABI, Trijoko T, Daryono BS. 2017. Growth and plumage color uniformity of back cross (BC2) chicken resulted from genetics selection of pelung chicken and broiler crossed. Jurnal Veteriner. vol 18(4): 557–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2017.18.4.557.

Poláček M, Griggio M, Mikšík I, Bartíková M, Eckenfellner M, Hoi H. 2017. Eggshell coloration and its importance in postmating sexual selection. Ecology and Evolution. vol 7(3): 941–949. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2664.

Reddy PM, Reddy VR, Reddy CV, Rao PSP. 1979. Egg weight, shape index and hatachability in Khaki Campbell duck eggs. Indian Journal of Poultry Science. vol 14(1): 26–31.

Risdianto D, Suthama N, Suprijatna E, Sunarso S. 2019. Inclusion effect of ginger and turmeric mixture combined with Lactobacillus spp. isolated from rumen fluid of cattle on health status and growth of broiler. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture. vol 44(4): 423–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.44.4.423-433.

Samaraweera AM, Silva P, Abeykone NDF, Ibrahim MNM, Okeyo AM, Han JL. 2014. Population genetic structure of Sri Lankan backyard chicken flocks: Implication for conservation and genetic improvement programs. Proceeding 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. August 17-22, 2014. Vancouver: American Society of Animal Science. p 448.

Samiullah S, Roberts JR, Chousalkar K. 2015. Eggshell color in brown-egg laying hens—a review. Poultry Science. vol 94(10): 2566–2575. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev202.

Sarica M, Erensayin C. 2009. Tavukçuluk ürünleri. Tavukçuluk Bilimi, Yetiştirme, Besleme ve Hastalıklar, Ed. M. Türkoğlu, M. Sarıca. Ankara: Bey Ofset Matbaacılık. p 89-139.

Sawitri R, Takandjandji M. 2012. Inbreeding pada Populasi Banteng (Bos javanicus d’Alton 1832) di Kebun Binatang Surabaya. Buletin Plasma Nutfah. vol 18(2): 84–94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/blpn.v18n2.2012.p84-94.

Setiawati T, Afnan R, Ulupi N. 2016. Performa produksi dan kualitas telur ayam petelur pada sistem litter dan cage dengan suhu kandang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan. vol 4(1): 197–203.

Stamps J, Groothuis TG. 2010. The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biological Reviews. vol 85(2): 301–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00103.x.

Tallentire CW, Leinonen I, Kyriazakis I. 2018. Artificial selection for improved energy efficiency is reaching its limits in broiler chickens. Scientific Reports. vol 8(1): 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23133-8.

Telalbašić R, Baban M, Rahmanović A. 2007. Inbreeding. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. vol 23(5–6): 113–130. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH0702113T.

Ummah IM, Mahardhika IWS, Daryono BS. 2019. Morphological traits, productive performance and genotyping fat deposition PPAR gene in Gama Ayam crossbreeds of female F1 Kamper and male BC1 Kambro. Biogenesis: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi. vol 7(2): 106–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v7i2.9993.

Wang SZ, Hu XX, Wang ZP, Li XC, Wang QG, Wang YX, Tang ZQ, Li H. 2012. Quantitative trait loci associated with body weight and abdominal fat traits on chicken chromosomes 3, 5 and 7. Genetics and Molecular Research. vol 11(2): 956–965. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2012.April.19.1.

Wolc A, Zhao HH, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O’Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Stricker C, Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekker JCM. 2015. Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens. Genomic Selection Evolution. vol 47: 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5.