Kajian Potensi Kualitas Kayu Melalui Uji Marka Anatomi Pada Tanaman Puspa (Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth. Sebagai Tanaman Revegetasi Lahan Pascatambang

  • Ahmad Taufiq Laboratorium Struktur dan Perkembangan Tumbuhan, Jurusan Biologi Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Andalas, Padang.
    (ID)
  • Alponsin A Laboratorium Struktur dan Perkembangan Tumbuhan, Jurusan Biologi Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Andalas, Padang
    (ID)

Abstract

Revegetation is one of the way to remedy polluted area. Some plants have been applied as revegetation plant due to it has the fast-growing rate and adaptive to the critical area. Plant species which potential for revegetation has ability to live and survive and some are pioneer species. Puspa tree (Schima wallichii (D.C.) Korth.) is a pioneer species that commonly found at either primary or secondary forest and even at savana area. Puspa can be used as revegetation plant also because it is easy propagated and belonging to a semi-fire proof plant species. Therefore, ecologically, puspa suit to be used as revegetation plant species candidate for the land after mining. Besides of matching with environment, that plant should also meet with the economic use. Anatomical study had been conducted to ensure the wood use precisely based on its quality. Three samples from different locations revealed no significant differentiation by their anatomy characters. The result of observation showed the Puspa wood had a small (50-100 πm) to very small (<50 πm) pore with soliter shape and “baur” type. The Parenchyma type of Puspa wood is apotrakeal baur and medullary ray is classified to uniseriate and multiseriate, very tall and wide. This tissue comprised with two types off cell, procumbent and upright ray cell (heterocellular). The fibre had was long (> 1600 µm) with thick wall and tight lumen. The result of anatomical comparison study between Puspa’s wood with commercial wood showed Puspa belonged to hardwood group grade 1 and 2. These data should be used as a considerable report for a recommendation reference of using puspa as a plant species for the reclamation of after mining area and anyway provides economic benefit.

References

Adman, B, Hendarto B, Sasongko DP. 2012. Pemanfaatan Jenis Pohon Lokal Cepat Tumbuh Untuk Pemulihan Lahan Pascatambang Batubara (Studi Kasus Di PT. Singlurus Pratama, Kalimantan Timur). Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan. vol 10 (1): 19-25. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.10.1.19-25.

Afifah N. 2014. Pertumbuhan Beberapa Jenis Bibit Pohon Hutan yang Diinokulasi Endomikoriza Dari HPPB UNAND Pada Tanah Lahan Bekas Tambang PT. Semen Padang. [Skripsi]. Padang: Jurusan Biologi. Universitas Andalas.

Ashraf MA, Maah MJ, Yusoff I. 2011. Heavy metals accumulation in plants growing in ex tin mining catchment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. vol 8 (2): 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326227.

Mandang YI dan Pandit IKN. 1997. Pedoman Identifikasi Kayu di Lapangan. Bogor: Prosea, Pusat Diklat Pegawai dan SDM Kehutanan.

Mandang YI dan Pandit IKN. 2002. Pedoman Identifikasi Kayu di Lapangan. Bogor: Yayasan PROSEA Indonesia

Mandang YI, Ratih D, Tajudin EK, Siti N. 2008. Pedoman Identifikasi Kayu Ramin dan Kayu Mirip Ramin. Bogor: Departemen Kehutanan Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kehutanan Bekerja Sama Dengan International Tropical Timber Organization.

Martawijaya A. 1989. Atlas Kayu Indonesia: Jilid II. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan.

Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia. 2008. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor P. 61/menhut-ii/2008 tentang Ketentuan dan Tata Cara Pemberian Izin Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Kayu Restorasi Ekosistem Dalam Hutan Alam Pada Hutan Produksi Melalui Permohonan. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 No.68. Biro Hukum dan Organisasi. Jakarta.

Mutmainah U. 2011. Corak Beberapa Jenis Kayu Perdagangan Indonesia. [Skripsi]. Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Pandit IKN dan Kurniawan D. 2008. Anatomi Kayu: Struktur Kayu, Kayu Sebagai Bahan Baku dan Ciri Diagnostik Kayu Perdagangan Indonesia. Bogor: Centium.

Priasukmana S dan Silitonga. 1972. Cara Pengukuran Serat Kayu. Bogor: Lembaga Penelitian Hasil Hutan LPHH, Direktorat Jenderal Kehutanan, Departemen Pertanian Bogor.

Sandri Y, Maideliza T, Syamsuardi. 2013. Struktur Anatomi Kayu Beberapa Jenis Buah-Buahan. J. Bio. UA. 2(3): 181-187

Sass JE. 1958. Botanical Microtechnique. 3rd Ed. IAWA: Iowa State College Press. University of Michigan.

Setyawan AD. 2000. Tumbuhan Epifit pada Tegakan Pohon Schima wallichii (D.C.) Korth. di Gunung Lawu. Jurnal Biodiversitas. 1(1):14-20.

Wheler EA, Baas P, Gasson E. 1989. IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Hardwood Identification. IAWA Bulletin. N.s. vol. 10 (3): 219-332.

Yassir I dan Omon RM. 2009. Pemilihan Jenis-Jenis Pohon Potensial Untuk Mendukung Kegiatan Restorasi Lahan Tambang Melalui Pendekatan Ekologis. Prosiding Workshop IPTEK Penyelamatan Hutan Melalui Rehabilitasi Lahan Pascatambang Batubara. Balai Besar Penelitian Dipterokarpa. Samarinda. hal: 64-76.

Wahyudi I. 2013. Hubungan Struktur Anatomi Kayu Dengan Sifat Kayu, Kegunaan Dan Pengolahannya. Bogor: Diskusi LitBang Anatomi Kayu Indonesia.

Published
2018-02-28
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed = 3468 times