Inheritance and Comparison of Phenotypic Characters from Hybrid Chicken GK-Bro (Gallus gallus Linnaeus, 1758)

  • Putu Ayu Damayanti Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)
  • Budi Setiadi Daryono Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • I Wayan Swarautama Mahardhika Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
    http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-3156

Abstract

GK-Bro (Gallus gallus Linnaeus, 1758) is a hybrid chicken from crossing between ♀ F2 Broiler ♂ F2 Golden Kamper that have variation of phenotypic character. To meet the market’s demand, GK-Bro must have prime phenotypic character in both quantity and quality. This research aims to examine the phenotype character that occur in GK-Bro by the character of feet morphometry, crest’s shape, feather’s color, and feet’s color. The parental chicken are crossed in Innovation and Agriculture Centre of Gadjah Mada University (Indonesia) and produce 11 chickens with five males and six females filial. The filial are maintained intensively and qualitative data were observed at the end of seven weeks, classified based on the percentage of the phenotypic class. Quantitative characters that observed were tibia and femur length after seven weeks, using control pelung, broiler, and F1 broiler. Quantitative data showed that the average length of the tibia and femur of GK-Bro is lower when compared to the control but the ratio of feet morphometry is closer to pelung. Qualitative data classified crest form in one class, feather’s color in 4 classes and feet’s color in 3 class. 

References

Applegate TJ, and Lilburn MS. 2002. Growth of the femur and tibia of a commercial broiler line. Poultry Science. vol 81(9): 1289–1294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.9.1289.

Ben-Zaken S, Richard V, Tenenbaum G. 2019. Genetics and the psychology of motor performance (Routledge Research in Sport and Exercise Science). 1st ed, Kindle Edition. Abingdon: Routledge. pp 210.

Cahill JP, and Provance MC. 2002. Genetics of Qualitative Traits in Domesticated Chia (Salvia hispanica L.). Journal of Heredity. vol 93(1): 52–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.1.52.

Cassell B. 2007. Mechanisms of inbreeding depression and heterosis for profitable dairying. Proceeding of 4th Biennial W.E. Peterson Symposium, Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle: The Science and the Impact. April 2, 2007. Minnesota: St. Paul Campus. pp. 1-6.

Chang VS, Lejeune J, Cheng KM. 2010. The pattern of inheritance of melanin-based plumage color variants in the Gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus). Journal of Raptor Research. vol 44(3): 224–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-09-61.1.

Charlesworth D, and Willis J. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Review Genetics. vol 10: 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2664.

Dharmawan R, Prayogi HS, Nurgiartiningsih VMA. 2016. Penampilan produksi ayam pedaging yang dipelihara pada lantai atas dan lantai bawah. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. vol 26(3): 27–37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2016.026.03.05.

Habibah I. 2018. Karakter fenotip, koefisien inbreeding, dan polimorfisme gen ctyr intron 4 pada ayam (Gallus gallus gallus Linnaeus, 1758) hibrida Golden Kamper. [Skripsi]. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Biologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada. pp. 5–6.

Henuk YL, and Bakti D. 2016. Husbandry systems of keeping native chickens in tropical areas of Indonesia. Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Tropical Animal Science and Production. July 26-29. Thailand: Suranaree University of Technology. ISBN 978-974-533-710-7. pp. 147-150.

Hidayat N, Sumantri C, Afnan R, Arifiantini RI. 2016. Penentuan konsentrasi sodium dodecyl sulfate dalam pengencer ringer laktat-kuning telur untuk preservasi semen ayam pelung. Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan. vol 10(2): 170–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.21157/j.ked.hewan.v10i2.5091.

Hidayat C, and Asmarasari SA. 2015. Native chicken production in Indonesia: a review. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia. vol 17(1): 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.17.1.1-11.2015.

Kristensen TN, Knudsen MR, Loeschcke V. 2011. Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions. Genetica. vol 139(4): 441–451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-011-9563-3.

Lesmana I. 2016. Asosiasi polimorfisme promoter gen Fshr dengan perkembangan folikel ovarium ayam hibrida [Gallus gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758)] hasil persilangan betina ras petelur dengan jantan pelung. [Skipsi]. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Biologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada. pp. 6–9.

Li S, Wang C, Yu W, Zhao S, Gong Y. 2012. Identification of Genes Related to White and Black Plumage Formation by RNA-Seq from White and Black Feather Bulbs in Ducks. PLoS One. vol 7(5): e36592. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036592.

Lobo I. 2008. Pleiotropy: One gene can affect multiple traits. Nature Education. vol 1(1):10.

Mahardhika IWS, and Daryono BS. 2019. Phenotypic performance of kambro crossbreeds of female broiler cobb 500 and male pelung blirik hitam. Buletin Veteriner Udayana. vol 11(2): 188–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2019.v11.i02.p12.

Maw AA, Shimogiri T, Riztyan, Kawabe K, Kawamoto Y, Okamoto S. 2012. Genetic diversity of myanmar and indonesia native chickens together with two jungle fowl species by using 102 indels polymorphisms. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. vol 25(7): 927–934. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11511.

McGraw KJ, Safran RJ, Wakamatsu K. 2005. How feather colour reflects its melanin content. Functional Ecology. vol 19(5): 816–821. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01032.x.

Minvielle F, Gourichon D, Monvoisin JL. 2002. Testing homology of loci for two plumage colors, “lavender” and “recessive white,” with chicken and japanese quail hybrids. Journal of Heredity. vol 93(1): 73–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.1.73.

Mir NA, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V, Shukla V. 2017. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. vol 54(10): 2997–3009. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs13197-017-2789-z.

Moiseyevaa IG, Romanov MN, Nikiforova AA, Sevastyanovac AA, Semyenova SK. 2003. Evolutionary relationships of Red Jungle Fowl and chicken breeds. Genetic Selection Evolution. vol 35(4): 403–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2003031.

Nataamijaya AG. 2000. The native chicken of Indonesia. Buletin Plasma Nutfah. vol 6(1): 1–6.

Nataamijaya AG. 2005. Karakteristik penampilan pola warna, bulu, kulit, sisik kaki dan paruh ayam pelung di Garut dan ayam sentul di Ciamis. Buletin Plasma Nufah. vol 11 (1): 1.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/blpn.v11n1.2005.p1-5.

Puspita UE, Utomo RT, Perdamaian ABI, Lesmana I, Arijuddin H, Erwanto Y, Daryono BS, Saragih HTSG. 2017. Effect of varying levels of protein and energy in pre-stater feeds on pectoralis muscle development of Kampung Super Chicks (Gallus gallus gallus). Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. vol 12(1): 31–37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2017.31.37.

Salaam ZK, Akinyemi MO, Osamede OH. 2016. Effect of strain and age on bone integrity of commercial broiler chickens. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. vol 32 (2): 195–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1602195S.

Setianto J, Zain B, Sutriyono, Prakoso H. 2017. Domestication of red jungle fowl: A case study of the red jungle fowl chicks procurement by the communities in Central Bengkulu, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. vol 18(1): 183–189. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d180125.

Ulfah M, Perwitasari D, Jakaria, Muladno, Farajallah A. 2015. Breed determination for Indonesian local chickens based on matrilineal evolution analysis. International Journal of Poultry Science. vol 14(11): 615–621.

Visscher P, Hill W, Wray N. 2008. Heritability in the genomics era-concepts and misconceptions. Nature Review Genetics. vol 9: 255–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2322.

Wiebe KL, and Bortolotti GR. 2001. Variation in colour within a population of northern flickers: a new perspective on an old hybrid zone. Canadian Journal of Zoology. vol 79(6): 1046–1052. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-065.

Published
2019-12-29
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed = 458 times