Prefiks /t-/ pada Konjugasi Verba Imperfektif Bahasa Arab, dalam Tinjauan Optimality Theory / Prefix /T-/ In the Conjugation of the Arabic Imperfective Verb, In Optimality Theory Perspective
Abstract
هناك نوعان من ضمائر سوابق أكثر إثارة للمناقشة في تصريف الأفعال المضارعة في اللغة العربية، وهما/ي/ و/ ت/. ويتركز النقاش حول علاقة الشكل والمعنى لتلك الضمائر التي تم تداخل بعضها مع بعض لتحديد معناها المراد. وضمير الغائبات يستخدم بـ/ي/ مع أنّها مستخدمة أيضا في التعبير عن ضمير الغائب. والظاهرة الأخرى أنّ /ت/ تدل على الغائبة والغائبتين بحيث إنّها تُستَخدم كذلك للتعبير عن المخاطب والمخاطبة. والسؤال في هذه الدراسة هو كيف تعيين كل من هذه السوابق بمعنى واحد من أجل الخوارزمية. فمن خلال استخدام نظرية المفاضلة أو المعروفة ب- optimality theory ، يمكن الحلّ على هذا التداخل بتحقيق علاقة فردية بين الشكل والمعنى من أجل صياغة الخوارزمية. يعد قيد تقسيم الميزة * من Xu أحد الأدوات التي يجب توجيهها في إنشاء الشكل الأفضل. وأوضحت نتائج الدراسة أن وظيفة /ت-/ لتعبير المخاطب والمخاطبة برمز / ت-/ {2} و أن وظيفة / ي-/ للتعبير الغائب و الغائبة .الكلمات المفتاحية : ضمائر سوابق ؛ تصريف الأفعال المضارعة؛ تقسيم الميزة.
Abstract:
Two prefix pronouns that often debated in the imperative verb conjugation in Arabic namely /y-/ and /t-/. The overlapping relationship of form and meaning in the two prefixes is the problem. The plural feminine third person pronoun is expressed by the prefix /y-/, whereas /y-/ also expresses the masculine third person pronoun. The singular and dual feminine third person pronouns are realized by the prefix /t-/, whereas /t-/ also denotes the second person. The way of mapping each prefix related to the meaning based on the algorithm. These problem can be overcome through the paradigm of Optimality Theory which revealed the relationship between form and meaning due to the algorithm formulation. Xu’s constraint is one of the instruments to guide us generate the most optimal form. This research revealed that the personal pronoun of the second person symbolized by /t-/ while the third person was symbolized by /y-/.
Downloads
References
Aghbari, Khalsa Al, ‘Vb Infixed Plural in Jebbali’, Morphology, 24.2 (2014), 105–19 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9236-x>
Aronof, Mark, and Zheng Xu, ‘A Realization Optimality-Theoretic Approach to Affix Order’, Morphology, 20.2 (2010), 381–441 <https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s11525-010-9181-2>
Asherov, Daniel, and Outi Bat El, ‘Multiple Default: Feminine –et and –a in Hebrew Present Tense’, Morphology, 26.3–4 (2016), 399–423 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9279-2>
Bank, Sebastian, ‘Assesing The Typology of Person Portmanteaus’, Morphology, 27.3 (2017), 383–422 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9304-0>
Bataineh, Hussein Al, ‘Emphasis of Harmony in Arabic: A Critical Assesment Feature-Geometric and Optimality-Theoretic Approaches’, Languages, 4.4 (2019), 79 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040079>
Bonet, Eulalia, ‘Item and Arrangement or Item and Process?’, Cuadernos de Lingüística, 15 (2008), 1–12 <https://portalrecerca.uab.cat/en/publications/item-and-arrangement-or-item-and-process>
Bybee, Joan L., Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Forms (Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 1985)
Dekkers, Joost, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer, eds., Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)
Gaber, Gaber Miftah, ‘An Optimality Theory Account of the Non-Concatenative Morphology of the Nominal System of Libyan Arabic with Special Reference to the Broken Plural’ (University of Durham, 2012) <http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3511/>
Hockett, Charles F., ‘Two Models of Gramatical Description’, Word, 10.2–3 (1954), 210–34 <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659524?needAccess=true>
Holes, Clive, Modern Arabic : Structures, Functions, and Varieties, Revised Ed (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2004)
Holes, Clive, Modern Arabic: Structures, Function, and Varieties (New York: Longman, 1948)
Legendre, Géraldine, ‘Morphological and Prosodic Alignment of Bulgarian Clitics’, in Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 423–62
Legendre, Géraldine, Jane Grimshaw, and Sten Vikner, Optimality-Theoretic Syntax (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001)
Mardiah, Zaqiatul, Nur Hizbullah, and Awaliyah Ainun Niswah, ‘Blocking and Extended Exponence of Suffix Pronoun in Arabic Perfective Verb Conjugation’, International Journal of Humanities Studies, 5.2 (2020), 730–45 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7454/irhs.v0i0.270>
McCarthy, John J., ‘Optimal Paradigms’, in Paradigms in Phonological Theory, ed. by Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 170–210
McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince, ‘Generalized Alignment’, in Yearbook Morphology, ed. by G. E. Booij and J. van Marle (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993), pp. 79–153
Montolalu, Lucy R., Muhadjir, and Multamia RMT Lauder, ‘Tipologi Bahasa Dan Bahasa-Bahasa Di Dunia’, in Pesona Bahasa: Langkah Awal Memahami Linguistik (Jakarta: Gramedia, 2007)
Noamane, Ayoub, ‘Consonant Gemination in Morrocon Arabic: A Constraint Based Analysis’, Journal of Apllied Language and Culture Studies, 3, 2020, 37–68 <https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/JALCS/article/view/16892>
Noyer, Robert Rolf, ‘Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure’ (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992) <http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/noyer92.pdf>
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky, Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar (Wiley, 1993)
Sakarna, Ahmad Khalaf, ‘A Proposed Model of OT for Jordanian Arabic Broken Plural’, English Language Teaching, 6.1 (2013), 48–55 <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p48>
Tromer, Jochen, and Sebastian Bank, ‘Inflectional Learning as Local Optimization’, Morphology, 27 (2017), 383–422 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9304-0>
Wright, W., Arabic Grammar (New York: Dover, 2005)
Wunderlich, Dieter, ‘How Gaps and Substitutions Can Become Optimal: An OT Account of Argument Linking in Yimas’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 99.2 (2001), 315–66 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00084>
Xu, Zheng, ‘Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory’ (Stony Brook Unuversity, 2007) <https://linguistics.stonybrook.edu/_pdf/dissertation/Xu_2007_dissertation.pdf>
Xu, Zheng, and Mark Aronoff, ‘A Realization Optimality –Theoretic Approach to Blocking and Extended Morphological Exponence’, Journal of Linguistics, 47.3 (2011), 673–707 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671100003X>
