Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penilaian Afektif Mata Kuliah Komunikasi dalam Praktik Kebidanan
Validity and Reliability of the Affective Assessment Instrument for the Communication Course in Midwifery Practice
Abstract
Introduction: The affective domain is important for assessing student attitudes and behavior in the learning process, but the implementation is still lacking. So far, affective assessment is still implied in the assessment of the cognitive domain, so that the assessment of the affective domain is still carried out with cursory observations. Affective domain assessment needs to be supported using tests that match the characteristics of learning objectives. Attitude assessment can be subjective so we need an instrument that is able to measure objectively. This research aims to evaluate the feasibility of an affective ability assessment instrument in the Communications in Midwifery course at the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Borneo Tarakan. Methods: This type of research is descriptive. The research sample was 30 midwifery students who were taken randomly. Data collection used an affective assessment questionnaire in the communication course in midwifery practice. Results: The results of the validity test research carried out, 22 items were declared valid out of 25 statement items (rcount > 0.361) and the instrument reliability test was 0.858 (alpha > 0.7). Conclusion: affective assessment instruments can be declared feasible and reliable so that they can be used to measure students' affective abilities
References
Ahrens, Rudy de Barros, Luciana da Silva Lirani, and Antonio Carlos de Francisco. 2020. “Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (20): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364.
Amalia, Rezha Nur, Ragil Setia Dianingati, and Eva Annisaa’. 2022. “Pengaruh Jumlah Responden Terhadap Hasil Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Pengetahuan Dan Perilaku Swamedikasi.” Generics: Journal of Research in Pharmacy 2 (1): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.14710/genres.v2i1.12271.
Amirrudin, Muhammad, Khoirunnisa Nasution, and Supahar Supahar. 2020. “Effect of Variability on Cronbach Alpha Reliability in Research Practice.” Jurnal Matematika, Statistika Dan Komputasi 17 (2): 223–30. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655.
Anvik, Tor, Tore Gude, Hilde Grimstad, Anders Baerheim, Ole B. Fasmer, Per Hjortdahl, Are Holen, Terje Risberg, and Per Vaglum. 2007. “Assessing Medical Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Communication Skills - Which Components of Attitudes Do We Measure?” BMC Medical Education 7: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-4.
Arum, Annisa Etika, Muhammad Khumaedi, and Endang Susilaningsih. 2022. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Domain Afektif (Sikap) Kepercayaan Diri Pada Siswa.” Jurnal Basicedu 6 (3): 5467–74. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.3203.
Astalini, Astalini, and Dwi Agus Kurniawan. 2019. “Pengembangan Instrumen Sikap Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Ipa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (Jps) 7 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.7.1.2019.1-7.
Baird, Tamara, Virginia Ruth Corey, Jenna Sissom, Jennifer Weber, and Suzanne Hetzel Campbell. 2021. “Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Adapted Health Communication Assessment Tool©.” Clinical Simulation in Nursing 52: 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.11.001.
Hoque, M Enamul. 2016. “Three Domains of Learning: Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor.” The Journal of EFL Education and Research 2 (January 2017): 2520–5897.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. “Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.”
Krathwohl, David R, Benjamin S. Bloom, and Bertram B. Masia. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David Mckay Company in corporated.
Novitasari, Yuni, Pramono Eka Adi, and Henry Praherdhiono. 2018. “Respons Afektif Pebelajar Terhadap Pemberian Tugas Pada Pembelajaran Blended.” Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan 1 (2): 85–94.
Nygren, Eeva, A. Seugnet Blignaut, Verona Leendertz, and Erkki Sutinen. 2019. “Quantitizing Affective Data as Project Evaluation on the Use of a Mathematics Mobile Game and Intelligent Tutoring System.” Informatics in Education 18 (2): 375–402. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.18.
Ponto, Hantje. 2020. “The Evaluation of Affective Domain Learning Outcome in Students’ Basic Learning of Electrical Circuit in Vocational Education School.” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 17 (2): 1222–26. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.8793.
Prajoko, Setiyo, Alfi Anjani, Rezti Dwi Oktaviani, Padmaning Fathimah, and Wimba Kamaludin. 2021. “Development of Self-Assessment Instruments to Measure Student Affective Domains on Online Biology Learning.” Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching 4 (2): 185. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v4i2.11964.
Puspasari, Heny, and Weni Puspita. 2022. “Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Tingkat Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Mahasiswa Terhadap Pemilihan Suplemen Kesehatan Dalam Menghadapi Covid-19.” Jurnal Kesehatan 13 (1): 65. https://doi.org/10.26630/jk.v13i1.2814.
Retnawati, Heri. 2017. “Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian.” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Unnes 12 (1): 129541. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132255129/pengabdian/8 Reliabilitas3 alhamdulillah.pdf.
Rukminingsih, Gunawan Adnan, and Mohammad Adnan Latief. 2020. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Penelitian Kuantitatif, Penelitian Kualitatif, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. Vol. 53.
Santee, Jennifer A., Jacob M. Marszalek, and Karen L. Hardinger. 2019. “A Critique of Validity Analysis from Instruments Assessing the Affective Domain.” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 11 (2): 218–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.010.
Santi, Elia, M. Haris Setiawan, and Muhammad Khumaedi. 2019. “Developing Assessment Instrument on Writing on Descriptive Paragraph Based on Picture of Junior High School Students.” Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation 8 (2): 116–22. https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v8i2.36086.
Santoso, Budi, Carla Raymondalexas Marchira, and P. Sumarni. 2017. “Development and Validity and Reliability Tests of Professionalism Assessment Instrument in Psychiatry Residents.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education 6 (1): 60. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25369.
Selaras, Ganda Hijrah, Yuni Ahda, Heffi Alberida, and Tri Putri Wahyuni. 2019. “The Validity and Reliability of The Instrument Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skill on The Biological Scope Materials.” Bioeducation Journal 3 (2): 151–58. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v3i2.242.
Sudaryono, Untung Rahardja, Qurotul Aini, Yuliana Isma Graha, and Ninda Lutfiani. 2019. “Validity of Test Instruments.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1364 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1364/1/012050.
Taber, Keith S. 2018. “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education.” Research in Science Education 48 (6): 1273–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
Walker, David A. 2017. “JMASM 48: The Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient and Adjustment Indices: The Fisher Approximate Unbiased Estimator and the Olkin-Pratt Adjustment (SPSS).” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 16 (2): 540–46. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1509496140.
Yusup, Febrianawati. 2018. “Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif.” Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan 7 (1): 17–23. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100.
Copyright (c) 2023 Teresia Suminta Rotua Situmorang, Annisa Eka Permatasari, Reza Bintangdari Johan, Nur Aisyah Laily, Idha Farahdiba, Nurrahmi Umami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
- granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
- permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead to wider dissemination of the work.
- continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA license
- receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
