A Comparative Analysis of Trademark Rights Protection
Perspectives from Islamic Law and Positive Law in Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to identify the premise and types of legal protection for trademark rights, comparing Islamic and positive law to explore their roles in safeguarding these rights. Information technology, while aligned with business advancements, can create loopholes for mark violations Irresponsible acts such as brand piracy pose a significant threat to brand proprietors, making trademark rights a major source of civil disputes and illegal acts. This study conducts a comparative analysis of legal literature, focusing on books about Trademark Rights as the primary data source. Data were collected, analyzed, categorized, and conclusions are drawn. The findings showed two forms of legal protection for trademark, which included preventive and coercive. Preventive measures involve government or institutional warnings and restrictions on obligations, while coercive aspects impose penalties on counterfeiters. In Islamic law, forgery is considered the prohibited action of tazyīf, resulting in the infringement of rights of others.
References
Abdillah, Sukmawati, & Syah, M. F. (2022). Legal Protection Against Peer-to-Peer Lending-Based Financial Technology Losses; An Analysis of Islamic Law Contracts and Positive Law. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 4(2), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.vi.32022
Ahmad, M. M., & Shāfiʿī, I. M. b. I. al-. (2014). Reviewing Imām al-Shāfiʿī’s tafsīr Āyāt al-aḥkām for developing principles of contemporary tafsīr literature. IIUC Studies (Research Journal of the International Islamic University Chittagong (IIUC)), 10–11(December), 9–38.
Al-Bawwab, R. A. (2023). Zakat: changing the framework of giving. Islamic Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/ies-08-2021-0026
Alfons, M. (2017). Implementasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum. Legislasi Indonesia, 14(03), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i3.111
Ali, M., Wahanisa, R., Barkhuizen, J., & Teeraphan, P. (2022). Protecting Environment through Criminal Sanction Aggravation. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(1), 191–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.54819
Atikah, N. (2019). Pierre Cardin Trademark Dispute. Mulawarman Law Review, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/0.30872/mulrev.v4i1.51
Çela, M. (2015). The importance of Trademarks and a review of empirical studies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(3), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2015.v4n3p125
Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2014). Hak Milik Intelektual. T. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fanani, A. (2021). The Hanbalite Theology: A Critical Study of The Hanbalite Theological Creeds and Polemical Adversaries. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v17i1.11353
Hanic, A., & Smolo, E. (2022). Islamic approach to corporate social responsibility: an international model for Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2021-0284
Haq, H., & Arif, A. A. (2020). Al-‘Alāmah al-Tijāriyyah wa Ḥimāyatuhā fī al-Qānūn al-Indūnīsī: Dirāsah Fiqhiyyah Taqwīmiyyah. Al-Ahkam Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 30(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.5293
Hussein, S. F. (2020). Civil protection of the trademark: A comparative study. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 755–765.
Ibrahim, A., & Salam, A. J. (2021). A comparative analysis of DSN-MUI fatwas regarding murabahah contract and the real context application (A study at Islamic Banking in Aceh). Samarah, 5(1), 372–401. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.8845
Khaerunisa, F. E. (2021). Adultery in the Perspective of Islamic Religious Law and Positive Law in the Indonesian Community. HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 18(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v18i2.614.158-174
Kurniawan, F., Taufiqurrohman, M. M., & Nugraha, X. (2022). Legal Protection of Trade Secrets over the Potential Disposal of Trade Secrets Under the Re-Engineering Precautions. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 16(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.v16.267-282
Lapatantja, N. A., & Bakry, M. (2021). Comparative Analyses of Maliki and Hanbali Thought on Waqf Istibdal. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 3(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v3i1.21129
Law No. 20 of 2016. (2016). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016: Marks and Geographical Indications. https://internationalipcooperation.eu/sites/default/files/arise-docs/2019/Indonesia_Law-on-Marks-and-Geographical-Indications-20-2016.pdf
Meirison, M., & Nazar, Z. (2021). Intellectual Property Rights and Monopoly in the Perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence. Al-Ahkam, 31(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2021.31.1.6656
Miru, A. (2005). Cara Mudah Mmempelajari Undang-Undang Merek. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mukhtar, S. (2018). Islamic Law and Trademark Protection. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol6no1.56
Murbiantoro, A. O., Safa, R., & Law, F. (2020). Adopting Passing off Concept of Unfair Competition Into Indonesia ’ s Trademark Law. Open Journal for Legal Studies, 3(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0302.05133m
Mustafida, R., Kurnia, Z. N., Fauziah, N. N., Subri, N. S. B., & Faiz, F. A. B. A. (2020). the Implementation of Maqashid Shariah in Zakat Institution: Comparison Between Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam (Journal of Islamic Economics and Business), 6(2), 317. https://doi.org/10.20473/jebis.v6i2.23532
Nahak, S. (2017). Criminal Law Policy on Land Functions Impacting Climate Change in Indonesian National Law Perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.50
Naro, W., Syatar, A., Amiruddin, M. M., Haq, I., Abubakar, A., & Risal, C. (2020). Shariah Assessment Toward the Prosecution of Cybercrime in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 572–586. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.5
Nath Saha, C., & Bhattacharya, S. (2011). Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 2(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.82952
Nurma Fitriani, S., Ochtorina Susanti, D., & Efendi, A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Merek yang Sesuai dengan Karakteristik Hak Merek. Jurnal Rechtens, 11(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v11i2.1783
Paramole, K. O., & Sanni, M. O. (2022). Islamic Legislation on Wealth Acquisition: A Critical Examination of Crypto-Currency. Millah, 21(3), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art6
Rohman, M. M. (2021). The Benefit Principles of Istibdāl on Wakaf Objects (Analysis of Dhawābith al-Mashlahah Sa’īd Ramadhān al-Būthi). Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 6(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm v6i1.1246
Sáiz, P., & Castro, R. (2018). Trademarks in branding: Legal issues and commercial practices. Business History, 60(8), 1103–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2018.1497765
Samosir, P. O., & Mustafa, A. (2020). Legal Protection Implications on Trademark in Indonesia by Comparing the First to Use and First to File Principles. International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019), 121(20), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.029
Sanseverino, R. V. (2022). Theology of Veneration of the Prophet Muḥammad. In The Presence of the Prophet in Early Modern and Contemporary Islam. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004466739_008
Senftleben, M. (2022). Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 53(4), 567–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01182-x
Sujoko, I. (2017). Hujjiyah Nazariyah Saddi az-Żarāiʻ fī al-Fiqh al- Islāmy wa tatbīquhā fī Qadāyā al-Maʹkȗlāt wa al- Mashrȗbāt wa al-Malbȗsāt. Insaniyat: Journal of Islam and Humanities, 2(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.15408/insaniyat.v2i1.6591
Syatar, A., & Mundzir, C. (2021). TOKOH DAN KETOKOHAN IMAM MAZHAB (Kontribusinya terhadap Pengembangan Fikih di Indonesia). Alauddin University Press.
Wagner, R. E. (2019). Governance within a system of entangled political economy. Forest Policy and Economics, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.004
Weriansyah, A., & Ramadani, A. P. (2022). The Analysis of Corporate Crime in Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Laws. Global Legal Review, 2(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v2i1.5139
Zaprulkhan. (2018). Maqāṣid Al-Shariah in the Contemporary Islamic Legal Discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 26(2), 445. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Shuhufi, Firdayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.