Pengaruh Personal Space Terhadap Kenyamanan Belajar Ruang Studio Gambar Arsitektur Universitas Hasanuddin

Shapardi Kahir; Yusriadi Yusriadi

doi:10.24252/nature.v11i1a2

Shapardi Kahir Hasanuddin University
(ID)
Yusriadi Yusriadi Departemen Arsitektur, Universitas Hasanuddin
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/nature.v11i1a2

Keywords: Personal Space, Proxemics, Concentration, Personal Distance

Abstract

Abstrak_ Studio gambar adalah suatu ruang dimana mahasiswa menyelesaikan mata kuliah inti desain arsitektur pada jurusan arsitektur. Studio merupakan ruang untuk melakukan berbagai aktivitas seperti diskusi baik dengan sesama peserta maupun dosen, membuat program dan perencanaan, melakukan studi preseden, presentasi gambar, mencari ide, dan membuat desain. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi personal space atau ruang personal mahasiswa pada ruang studio gambar departemen arsitektur Universitas Hasanuddin dan pengaruhnya terhadap konsentrasi belajar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Strategi purposive sampling digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data melalui kuesioner dan wawancara. Metode analisis deskriptif untuk menganalisis data mengenai personal space mahasiswa dalam belajar. Terdapat 64 orang menjadi sampel penelitian yaitu angkatan 2019 sebanyak 30 orang dan angkatan 2018 sebanyak 34 orang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa personal space mahasiswa terbagi dalam 4 kelompok jarak: jarak intim, jarak personal, jarak sosial dan jarak publik. Faktor situasional, aktivitas individu, kepribadian, jenis kelamin dan usia menjadi hal yang mempengaruhi personal space. Personal space memberikan pengaruh terhadap konsentrasi dalam belajar dalam ruang studio gambar. Jarak proksemik yang dekat, membuat mahasiswa lebih sulit untuk melakukan aktivitas sehingga konsentrasi berkurang, sedangkan jarak proksemik yang lebih jauh, membuat mahasiswa lebih leluasa untuk beraktivitas dan lebih bisa berkonsentrasi. Jarak antara individu menjadi salah satu variabel yang mempengaruhi kenyamanan belajar.

Kata kunci: Personal Space; Proksemik; Konsentrasi; Jarak Personal

Abstract_ Abstract_ The drawing studio is a space where students complete core architectural design courses in the architecture department. The studio is a space for carrying out various activities such as discussions with fellow participants and lecturers, making programs and plans, conducting precedent studies, presenting images, looking for ideas, and making designs. This research aims to identify students' personal space in the drawing studio room of the architecture department at Hasanuddin University and its influence on study concentration. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method. A purposive sampling strategy was used to collect data through questionnaires and interviews. Descriptive analysis method to analyze data regarding students' personal space in learning. There were 64 people in the research sample, namely 30 people from the 2019 class and 34 people from the 2018 class. The research results show that students' personal space is divided into 4 distance groups: intimate distance, personal distance, social distance, and public distance. Situational factors, individual activities, personality, gender, and age are things that influence personal space. Personal space has an influence on concentration in studying in the drawing studio room. The close proxemic distance makes it more difficult for students to carry out activities so concentration decreases, while the longer proxemic distance makes students more free to carry out activities and can concentrate better. Distance between individuals is one of the variables that influences learning comfort.

Keywords: Personal Space; Proxemics; Concentration; Personal Distance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altman, I. and Vinsel, A.M. (1977) ‘Personal Space: an Analysis Of ET Hall’s Proxemics Framework’, in Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research Volume 2. Springer, pp. 181–259.

Anita Mutiarabia and Mutia, F. (2022) ‘Dampak kualitas ruang pada personal space pengguna di Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Provinsi Jawa Timur’, Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 18(1), pp. 86–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v18i1.2007.

Bell, P.A. et al. (2001) Environmental psychology. New Jersey.

Bowers, B.S. and Manzi, T. (2006) ‘Private Security And Public Space: New Approaches to the Theory And Practice Of Gated Communities’, European Journal of Spatial Development, 4(4), pp. 1–17.

Brown, N. (2001) ‘Edward T. Hall: Proxemic Theory, 1966’, Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science. University of California, Santa Barbara. http://www. csiss. org/classics/content/13 Read, 18, p. 2007.

Casasanto, D. (2008) ‘Similarity and proximity: When does Close in Space Mean Close in Mind?’, Memory & Cognition, 36(6), pp. 1047–1056.

Dosey, M.A. and Meisels, M. (1969) ‘Personal space and self-protection.’, Journal of personality and social psychology, 11(2), p. 93.

Evans, G.W. and Wener, R.E. (2007) ‘Crowding and personal space invasion on the train: Please don’t make me sit in the middle’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), pp. 90–94.

Graziano, M.S.A. and Cooke, D.F. (2006) ‘Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior’, Neuropsychologia, 44(13), pp. 2621–2635.

Hantono, D. (2019) ‘Kajian Perilaku Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik’, NALARs, 18(1), p. 45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.18.1.45-56.

Kahir, S., Mulyadi, R. and Hamzah, B. (2023) ‘Room Gap Analysis of Thermal Comfort in Office Spaces: The Case of Office Space in The Barru Regent Tower Building, Indonesia’, International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, 10(12), pp. 205–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-12-14.

Kahir, S., Syam, S. and Harisah, A. (2020) ‘Persepsi Pengguna Terhadap Warna Interior Masjid’, Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 9(1), pp. 20–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v9i1.97.

LaCroix, K. and LaCroix, S. (2017) ‘Does seat location matter? A review of the proximity effect in large and small classrooms’, Community College Enterprise, 23(2).

Lewis, L. et al. (2017) ‘What makes a space invader? Passenger perceptions of personal space invasion in aircraft travel’, Ergonomics, 60(11), pp. 1461–1470.

Naghiloo, F. and Falahat, M.S. (2016) ‘The effect of environmental factors on sociopetality of urban spaces’, European online journal of natural and social sciences, 5(4), p. pp-1111.

Namazian, A. and Mehdipour, A. (2013) ‘Psychological Demands of the Built Environment , Privacy , Personal Space and Territory in Architecture’, International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 3(4), pp. 109–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20130304.04.

Pujadi, A. (2007) ‘Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi belajar mahasiswa: studi kasus pada fakultas ekonomi universitas bunda mulia’, Business Management Journal, 3(2).

Shin, J. et al. (2019) ‘Darling, get closer to me: Spatial Proximity Amplifies Interpersonal Liking’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), pp. 300–309.

Sugiono (2016) Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.