POST-TRUTH, MEDIA SOSIAL, DAN MISINFORMASI: PERGOLAKAN WACANA POLITIK PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN INDONESIA TAHUN 2019
Abstract
Today, positivistic in the political sphere has been invaded by the notion of relativism. The post-truth regime bursts into political discourse and public awareness. Community opinion is driven in distrust of objective data. Reality manipulation is increasingly being carried out for political purposes. In this condition, the community is more secure with pseudo-facts that match personal beliefs. The discourse of political lies is then packaged into alternative discourses to match objective facts. The development of massive information technology, through online media, helps the distribution of discourse in the community. Public awareness through opinion is built and new facts are created. This is how Indonesian political contestation in 2019 is full of strange discourses without data. Political recitals are chaotic because of the disparity among factions that spread lies, hatred, and nonsense. Community elements are exploited for the sake of discourse battle victory. Like passive objects that are annihilated, people are made slaves to win the political elite.
References
Buku dan Jurnal
Abrahamson, J.B., Arterton, F.C. dan Orren, G.R. 1990. The Electronic Commonwealth: The Impact of New Media Technologies on Democratic Politics. New York: Basic Books.
Anspach, N. M. 2017. The New Personal Influence: How our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590-606.
Bhaskaran, H., Mishra, H., dan Nair, P. 2017. Contextualizing Fake News in Post-truth Era: Journalism Education in India. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 27(1), 41–50.
Biały, B., dan Svetoka, S. 2016. New Trends in Social Media. Riga: NATO StratCom Centre of Excellence.
Block, D. 2019. Post-truth and Political Discourse. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boulianne, S. 2011. Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects Between News Media and Political Interest. Political Communication, 28(2), 147–162.
Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., dan Paulhus, D. L. 2014. Trolls Just Want to Have Fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102.
Cappella, J. N., dan Jamieson, K. H. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and The Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chang, W. 2018. Media Use and Satisfaction with Democracy: Testing the Role of Political Interest. Social Indicators Research, 140(3), 999-1016.
Clayton, K., Blair, S., Busam, J.A. et al. 2019. Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media. Political Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0.
Copsey, N. 2003. Extremism on The Net: The Extreme Right and The Value of The Internet. Dalam Political Parties and The Internet: Net Gain?, ed. R. Gibson, P. Nixon, dan S. Ward. London: Routledge.
Craker, N., dan March, E. 2016. The Dark Side of Facebook: The Dark Tetrad, Negative Social Potency, and Trolling Behaviours. Personality & Individual Differences, 102, 79-84.
D’Ancona, M. 2017. Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.
Davis, E. 2017. Post-truth: How We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little, Brown.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., dan Tang, D. T. W. 2010. Explicit Warnings Reduce but do Not Eliminate The Continued Influence of Misinformation. Memory and Cognition, 38(8), 1087–1100.
Elliot, T. S. 1920. The Sacred Wood: Essay on Poetry and Criticism. London: Methuen.
Eveland, W. P. 2004. The effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177–193.
Feldman, L. 2017. How Donald Trump Fits in the ‘Post-Truth’ World. The Christian Science Monitor. https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2017/0126/How-Donald-Trump-fits-in-the-post-truth-world. Diakses pada Tanggal 6 Mei 2019.
Frankfurt, H. G. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fredal, J. 2011. Rhetoric and Bullshit. College English, 73(3), 243–59.
Garrett, R. K., Weeks, B. E., dan Neo, R. L. 2016. Driving a Wedge Between Evidence and Beliefs: How Online Ideological News Exposure Promotes Political Misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 331–348.
Gerbaudo, P. 2012. Tweets and The Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London, England: Pluto Press.
Hannan, J. 2018. Trolling Ourselves to Death? Social Media and Post-truth Politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2) 214–226.
Harsin, J. 2015. Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture and Critique, 8(2), 327–333.
Hendricks, V. F., dan Vestergaard, M. 2019. Reality Lost: Markets of Attention, Misinformation, and Manipulation. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Kalpokas, I. 2019. A Political Theory of Post-truth. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kelm, O., dan Dohle, M. 2018. Information, Communication and Political Consumerism: How (online) Information and (online) Communication Influence Boycotts and Buycotts. New Media and Society, 20(4), 1523-1542.
Keyes, R. 2004. The Post-truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
KhosraviNik, M. 2014. Critical Discourse Analysis, Power and New Media Discourse. Dalam Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World, ed. Y. Kalyango., dan M.W. Kopytowska. New York: Peter Lang.
KhosraviNik, M. 2017. Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS). Dalam Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. J. Flowerdew, dan J. Richardson. London: Routledge.
KhosraviNik, M. 2018. Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication, and Contemporary Politics. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4), 427–442.
Kuklinski, J. H., P. J. Quirk, J. Jerit, D. Schwieder., dan R. F. Rich. 2000. Misinformation and The Currency of Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816.
Laybats, C., dan Tredinnick, L. 2016. Post Truth, Information, and Emotion. Business Information Review, 33(4), 204–206.
Leviston, Z., Walker, I., dan Morwinski, S. 2013. Your Opinion on Climate Change Might Not be as Common as You Think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334–337.
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., dan Ecker, U. 2017. Letting The Gorilla Emerge from The Mist: Getting Past Post-truth. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 418–424.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., dan Cook, J. 2017. Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the ‘Post-truth’ Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C., Schwarz, N., dan Cook, J. 2012. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131.
Louw, E. 2005. The Media and Political Process. London: Sage Publications.
Lyon, D. 2014. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2). 1-13.
Mair, J. 2017. Post-truth Anthropology. Anthropology Today, 33(3), 3–4.
Marshall, P. D., dan Henderson, N. 2016. Political Persona 2016: An Introduction. Persona Studies, 2(2), 1–18.
McComiskey, B. 2017. Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition. Colorado: Utah State University Press.
McCright, A. M., Charters, M., Dentzman, K., dan Dietz, T. 2016. Examining The Effectiveness of Climate Change Frames in the Face of a Climate Change Denial Counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 76–97.
McGranahan, C. 2017. An Anthropology of Lying: Trump and the Political Sociality of Moral outrage. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 243–248.
McIntyre. L. 2018. Post-truth. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Miller, C. T. 1993. Majority and Minority Perceptions of Consensus and Recommendations for Resolving Conflicts about Land Use Regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 389–398.
Neuman, W.R. 1991. The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press.
Ott, B. L. 2017. The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and The Politics of Debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68.
Papacharissi, Z. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. London: Oxford University Press.
Pariser, E. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. United Kingdom: Penguin.
Prozorov, S. 2018. Why is There Truth? Foucault in The Age of Post-truth Politics. Constellation, 26(1), 18-30.
Romano, A. 2017. Asserting Journalistic Autonomy in the Post-truth Era of Alternative Facts: Reporting on the Orations of a Populist Leader. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 27(1), 51–66.
Sawyer M.E. 2018. Post-Truth, Social Media, and the “Real” as Phantasm. Dalam Stenmark M., Fuller S., dan Zackariasson, U. (eds). Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shapiro. M.J. 1992. Reading the Postmodern Polity: Political Theory as Textual Practise. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Shirky, C. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Books.
Sloman, S., dan Fernbach, P. 2017. The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone. New York: Riverhead Books.
Strong, S. I. 2017. Alternative Facts and The Post-truth Society: Meeting The Challenge (University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017–04). US: University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online.
Stroud, N. J. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. NY: Oxford University Press.
Suiter, J. 2016. Post-truth Politics. Political Insight, 7(3), 25–27.
Sunstein, C. R. 2009. Republic.com 2.0. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Synnott, J., Coulias, A., dan Ioannou, M. 2017. Online Trolling: The Case of Madeleine McCann. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 70–78.
Tallis, B. 2016. Living in post-truth: Power/ Knowledge/ Responsibility. New Perspectives, 24(1), 7–18.
Tate, A. 2016. Facebook’s False Reality: Why Fake Political News Is On The Rise. New Statesman, September 9, 17. Accession number 117973830.
Valeriani, A., dan Vaccari, C. 2016. Accidental Exposure to Politics on Social Media as Online Participation Equalizer in Germany, Italy, and The United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857-1874.
Virilio, P. 1986. Speed and Politics. New York: Semiotext(e).
Wiesenberg, M., Zerfass, A., dan Moreno, A. 2017. Big Data and Automation in Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 95–114.
Wöllker, A., dan Powell, T. E. 2018. Algorithms in the Newsroom? News Readers’ Perceived Credibility and Selection of Automated Journalism. Journalism, 1-18.
Woolley, S. 2018. The Political Economy of Bots: Theory and Method in the Study of Social Automation. Dalam R. Kiggins (Eds.), The Political Economy of Robots. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koran, Majalah, dan Artikel Internet
https://katadata.co.id/telaah/2019/04/24/menelisik-perhitungan-real-count-ala-kubu-prabowo-sandi. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Mei 2019.
https://majalah.tempo.co/read/157570/presiden-republik-indonesia-joko-widodo-tugas-pemimpin-bukan-memanaskan-suasana. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Mei 2019.
https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/01/17/17162721/beberapa-jam-jelang-debat-pertama-twitter-dipenuhi-tagar-politik. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Mei 2019.
https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1197486/prabowo-sebut-quick-count-bohong-lembaga-survei-angkat-bicara. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Mei 2019.
https://www.merdeka.com/dunia/jelang-pemilu-facebook-dan-twitter-jadi-medan-tempur-buzzer-politik-jokowi-prabowo.html. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Mei 2019.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship. permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead to wider dissemination of the work. continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY license receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
