MAKNA TOPE'LE'LENG DI DESA TANAH TOA KECAMATAN KAJANG KABUPATEN BULUKUMBA (ANALISIS SEMIOTIKA CHARLES SANDERS PIERCE)

  • ASNIDAR ABBAS Universitas negeri Islam negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • HASARUDDIN HASARUDDIN Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • SURYANI MUSI Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)

Abstract

This research discusses the meaning of Tope Le'leng in Tanah Toa Village, Kajang District, Bulukumba Regency. The subject matter raised in this study is (1) how Tope Le'leng means to the people of Tanah Toa and (2) factors that affect Le'leng production. The objectives in this study are two: (1) To see the meaning of tope Le'leng for the people of Tanah Toa and (2) factors that affect the production of Tope Le'leng. The study used qualitative research with Charles Sanders Pierce's semiotic model analysis approach. A sign or representation according to Charles is something that represents something else in some way or capacity. Something else is called an interpretant of the first sign referring to an object. Then the use of marks is used to mean black sarongs. The results showed that (1) the meaning of Tope Le'leng for the people of Tanah Toa is very important. Because Tope Le'leng is used by people who want to do a traditional event or ritual, such as wanting to enter Ammatoa and want to do weddings and death ceremonies. Tope Le'leng is also a characteristic of the Kajang Community because Tope Le'leng is different from other ordinary sarongs made by the people of Tanah Toa itself by weaving, and materials or tools made by the community itself. According to the people of Tanah Toa Tope Le'leng must be preserved and should not be overcome and most importantly Tope Le'leng is the source of livelihood of the Kajang people.

References

Ansar, Akil, Muhammad, Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Gowa: Pustaka Almaida, 2017

Budiman Kris, Semiotika Visual konsep,isu, dan problem ikonisitas, Yogyakarta : Jalasutra, 2011

Kholifah, Siti & Wayan, Suyadnya, I. Metode penelitian kualitatif berbagi pengalaman dari lapangan. Agustus ; PT RajaGrafindo Persada

Liliweri, Alo. Prasangka, Konflik dan Komunikasi Antarbudaya, Edisi kedua (Jakarta; Prenadamedia group, 2018

Morissan, Teori Komunukasi Individu hingga massa. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2013

Mulyani, Deddy Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu pengantar, ( Bandung ; PT Remaja Rosdakarya 2015)

Panuju, Redi. Pengantar studi (ilmu) komunikasi komunikasi sebagai kegiatan komunikasi sebagai ilmu. Jakarta ; Prenadamedia group (divisi Kencana), 2013

Saepul, Hamdi, Asep. Dan Bahruddin, Metode penlitian kuantitatif aplikasi dalam pendidikan. Yogyakarta; Deepublish 2012

Semiawan, Conny. R. Metode penelitian Kualitatif jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya. Cikarang: Grasindo 2018

Sobur, Alex, Semiotika Komunikasi, Bandung : PT, Rosda Karya, 2004

Sudaryono. Metodologi Penelitian. Depok ; PT Raja Grafindo Persada 2017

Suyanto, Bagong. Metode penelitian social berbagai alternative pendekatan edisi revisi. Jakarta; Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005

Sztompka, Piotir. Sosiologi perubahan sosial. Edisi Pertama,Jakarta:Prenada Media Group, 2011

Walgito, Bimo. Pengantar psikologi umum. Yogyakarta: Andi,1980

Wibowo, Adik. Metode penelitian Praktis. Depok ; PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014

Indiwan, Seto, Wahyu, Wibowo, Semiotika aplikasi praktis bagi penelitian dan penulisan skripsi ilmu komunikasi, (Tangerang: wisma tiga dara perum Cimone Permai, 2009

Wiranata, Gede A.B. Hukum adat Indonesia perkembangannya dari masa ke masa,[t.d.]

Wulansari, Dewi. Hukum adat Indonesia-suatu pengantar, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama 2014

Published
2021-10-22
Section
Vol.2 No.3 September 2021
Abstract viewed = 763 times