THE ENGLISH VOCABULARY SIZE AND LEVEL OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS AT KUTAI KARTANEGARA UNIVERSITY
Abstract
The study employed descriptive-quantitative research design which aimed to investigate the mean vocabulary size and mastery level of English department students. The subjects of the study were the first-year students majoring in English education department at Kutai Kartanegara University. Thirty-three students employed in this study were given the Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) to measure their English vocabulary size as well as their mastery level. The findings of this study revealed that the students only knew about 1,273 word families. The result was still below the threshold as suggested by the vocabulary scholars and was not improved after years of learning. The finding also showed that the participants had a very low mastery level. They did not even master the 2,000 or 3,000 high frequency word level, nor the academic vocabulary level. The results indicate that the participants had a low vocabulary proficiency and suggest the future research to focus on investigating the vocabulary learning and instruction strategies that are effective to develop the students’ high frequency words and academic words.Downloads
References
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied linguistics, 24(4), 425-438.
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21-34.
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts. Reading in a foreign language, 15(2), 103.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. doi: 10.2307/3587951
Dardjowidjojo, S. (2002). Bahasa asing sebagai bahasa pengantar dalam system pendidikan. Bahasa dan Sastra, 22(1), 48-65.
Hananto. (2013). Government-funded computer-based vocabulary project in Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Collaborative education Journal, 9(1), 15-25.
Hu, H., & Nation, P. (2000). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts. Reading in a foreign language, 8, 689-696.
Ivone, F. M. (2005). Teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia: The urge to improve classroom vocabulary instruction. TEFLIN journal, 16(2), 195-208.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2012). English as an international language in Asia: Implications for language education English as an international language in Asia: Implications for language education (pp. 29-44): Springer.
Kurniawan, I. (2017). Assessing English students vocabulary size of Lampung State Islamic University. Humaniora, 8(4), 381-390. doi: https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v8i4.3909
Kweldju, S. (1997). English department students' vocabulary size and the development of a model of extensive reading with individualized vocabulary learning. Singapore, SEAMO-Regional Language Centre.
Kweldju, S. (2005). Lexically-based language teaching: Metaphor for enhancing learning. Indonesian JELT, 1(2), 52-65.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33-51.
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners' vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a foreign language, 22(1), 15.
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. Performance and competence in second language acquisition, 35.
Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5(1), 12-25.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian modern language review, 63(1), 59-82.
Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). What should every EFL teacher know? : Compass Publishing Seoul.
Nirattisai, S., & Chiramanee, T. (2014). Vocabulary learning strategies of Thai university students and its relationship to vocabulary size. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 273-287.
Nurhemida. (2007). The relationship between morphological awareness and English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian senior high school students. (Master Unpublished master's thesis), The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 161-175.
Quinn, G. (1968). The English vocabulary of some Indonesian university entrants. English Department Monograph IKIP Kristen Satya Watjana: Salatiga, 7(4).
Renandya, W. A. (2018). What kind of English proficiency is needed for effective teaching? Paper presented at the Indonesian TESOL Summit, Century Park Hotel, Jakarta.
Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, pedagogy and performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7-30.
Saukah, A. (2016). The English proficiency of the academics of the teacher training and education institutions. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1).
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching1. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484-503.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88. doi: doi:10.1177/026553220101800103
Sikki, E. A. A., Rahman, A., Hamra, A., & Noni, N. (2013). The competence of primary school English teachers in Indonesia. Journal of education and practice, 4(11), 139-145.
West, M., & West, M. P. (1953). A general service list of English words: With semantic frequencies and a supplementary word-list for the writing of popular science and technology: Addison-Wesley Longman Limited.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching: E. Arnold, 1973.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)