THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING AUTHENTIC TEXTS IN THE TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION

Abstract

It was conducted to investigate whether the use of authentic texts in the teaching of reading comprehension is effective. The design of the study was quasi-experimental with non-randomized pretest-posttest control group. The samples of this study were the eight grade of SMP Negeri 1 Lawang – Malang in the 2017/2018 academic year. The sampling technique applied was simple random sampling which was taken by using lottery. The result of the lottery showed that class VIII-I was chosen as the experimental group and class VIII-G as the control group. In collecting data, pretest – posttest used was in the form of multiple choice tests which covered the subject matter of reading comprehension. The pretest means of both groups were analyzed statistically by using Lavene’s. Lavene’s test revealed the significant value is .553 that is higher than .05. This result indicates that the difference between variances is not significant. This indicates that the subjects of experimental and control groups are not significantly different before the experiment in their pretest scores of reading comprehension test. Therefore, an independent t-test was used to analyze the posttest means. The result of research findings, it can be concluded that using authentic texts in teaching reading comprehension proved to be effective in increasing the students’ reading comprehension achievement. Thus, it is suggested that English teacher to utilize authentic texts in teaching reading comprehension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2).

Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2017). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. Guilford Publications.

Buehl, D. (2017). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Stenhouse Publishers.

Coady, J. (1996). 1 1 L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, 225.

Duke, N. K., Purcell‐Gates, V., Hall, L. A., & Tower, C. (2006). Authentic literacy activities for developing comprehension and writing. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 344–355.

Gribbons, B., & Herman, J. (1997). True and Quasi-Experimental Designs. ERIC/AE Digest.

Harmer, J. (2008). How to teach English. ELT Journal, 62(3), 313–316.

Johnson, M. J. (2002). The Medication Adherence Model: a guide for assessing medication taking. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 16(3), 179.

Lee, W. Y. (1995). Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal, 49(4), 323–328.

Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Intellect Books.

Nitecki, Z. (1982). Topological dynamics on the interval. In Ergodic theory and dynamical systems II (pp. 1–73). Springer.

Nunan, D. (1990). An Empirically Based Methodology for the Nineties.

Nuttal, A. D. (1989). Timon of Athens. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Rogers, C. V., & Medley, F. W. (1988). Language with a purpose: Using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21(5), 467–478.

Ruddell, M. (2005). Teaching content area reading and writing . Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Skiada, M. (2017). The use of authentic texts in second language teaching of adults at beginning and intermediary levels: the case of Modern Greek. University of Geneva.

Valencia, S. W., Hiebert, E. H., & Afflerbach, P. P. (1994). Realizing the possibilities of authentic assessment: Current trends and future issues. Authentic Reading Assessment: Practices and Possibilities. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford university press.

Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
Islam, S., & Santoso, E. (2018). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING AUTHENTIC TEXTS IN THE TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 4(2), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A3
Section
Volume 4 Number 02, December 2018
Abstract viewed = 1834 times