Supervision and Authority of Real Execution of Civil Cases

  • Muhammad Ilyas 085397352148
    (ID)
Keywords: Execution, Autority, Supervision

Abstract

This research stems from the many cases of disputes that have been legally binding but the rights have not been fulfilled due to constraints in real execution. A number of cases also require an in-depth understanding of the authority possessed by the Chairman of the District Court. The research method used combines normative and empirical approaches. The research focused on the High Court in the South Sulawesi region. The research subjects included all judges, including the Chief Justice, Registrar, and Substitute Registrar. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of internal supervision of the Chief Justice of the District Court is still ineffective in the implementation of civil case decisions that have permanent legal force. It is necessary to increase effective supervision over the implementation of decisions by the Chief of the District Court and a firm attitude is needed from the High Court and the Supreme Court as higher institutions in stages. In addition, opening up space for justice seekers to consider making extraordinary legal efforts, a better understanding of the types of decisions that can be executed, and solutions to legal obstacles that may arise in the execution process such as the establishment of regulations that can be used as legal instruments for resolving certain relatively complicated decisions, for the sake of justice, expediency and legal certainty in accordance with the value of justice for humanity.

References

Abdul Kadir Muhammad. 1996. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung.

Abdul Manan. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bina Cipta. Bandung.

Amran Suadi. 2014. Sistem Pengawasan Badan Peradilan di Indonesia. Rajawali Perss. Jakarta.

______ & Budi Suharyanto. 2016. Contempt Of Court Di Indonesia. Urgensi, Norma, Praktik & Masalahnya. PT. Alumni. Bandung.

Andi Hamzah. 1986. Hukum Acara Perdata. Liberty. Yogyakarta.

Bohari. 1992. Pengawasan Keuangan Negara.Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Hamid S. Attamimi.1993. Hukum Tentang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Peraturan Kebijakan. Fakultas Hukum UI. Jakarta.

Harifin A. Tumpa. 2010. Menakar Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Perdata. PukaP Indonesia. Makassar.

Irfan Fachruddin. 2004. Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah.Alumni. Bandung.

John Rawls. 2003. Justice as Fairness: a Restatement.United States of America: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
______. 2006. Teori Keadilan (terjemahan). Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Lilik Mulyadi. 1998. Hukum Acara Perdata Menurut Teori dan Praktek Peradilan Indonesia. Djambatan. Jakarta.

Moh. Taufik Makarao. 2004. Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata.PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Nur Rasaid, M. 2003. Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika Offset. Jakarta.

Prajudi Atmosudirdjo. 1983. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.

Sangadji. Z. A. 2003. Kompetensi Badan Peradilan Umum Dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung.

Sarwono. 2011. Hukum Acara Perdata : Teori dan Praktik.Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Siti Malikhatun Badriah. 2010. Penemuan Hukum Dalam Konteks Pencarian Keadilan. Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Semarang.

Sjachran Basah.1985. Eksistensi dan Tolok Ikur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia. Alumni. Bandung.

Soepomo, R. 1993. Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri.Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

Soepomo, R. 1993. Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri.Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. 1985. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (edisi kedua). Liberty. Yogyakarta.

Wantjik Saleh, K. 1980. Hukum Acara Perdata RBG/HIR.Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.

Yahya Harahap, M. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
______. 2006. Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

______. 2006. Kekuasaan Pengadilan Tinggi Dan Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Dalam Tingkat Banding. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

______. 2005. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
______. 2009. Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Teori, Praktik, Tehnik Membuat Dan Permasalahannya. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung.
Published
2023-12-25
How to Cite
Ilyas, M. (2023). Supervision and Authority of Real Execution of Civil Cases. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 10(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v10i2.45375
Section
Volume 10 Nomor 2 Desember 2023
Abstract viewed = 53 times