أنماط الحجة في خطاب المتحدثين في بطولة المناظرة باحتفال مؤسسات التعليم العالي بجامعة العلوم الإسلامية ماليزيا سنة 2018
Abstract
This article aims to describe the pattern of argumentation in the speakers' rhetoric at the Arabic debate championship in the Ihtifal Institusi Pengajian Tinggi (IPT) at Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2018. The speakers' rhetoric is studied based on the so-called Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern (TAP) which consists of six elements of argument, namely C (claim), statement, G (ground) reason or evidence, W (warrant) guarantee, B (backing) support, M (modal qualifier) certainty of statement, and R (rebuttal) disclaimer. In addition, the research method used is a qualitative description with content analysis techniques. The data collection technique in this study is a documentation technique in the form of recorded data on Arabic debates on YouTube with a total of 3 videos and each video has a duration of 8 minutes. The research findings reveal that there are 14 patterns of argumentation in the rhetoric of the three contra team speakers. The rhetoric of the first contra speaker includes various ideas forming the first pattern C (Claim) and G (Ground) 2 times, and the fourth pattern C (Claim), G (Ground), W (Warrant), M (Modal qualifier) and R (Rebuttal) mentioned once. Moreover, the rhetoric of the second contra speaker includes various ideas forming the first pattern C (Claim) and G (Ground) mentioned once, the second pattern C (Claim), G (Ground), and R (Rebuttal) mentioned once, and C (Claim), M (Modal qualifier) and R (Rebuttal) mentioned once, and the third pattern is C (Claim), G (Ground), M (Modal qualifier) and R (Rebuttal) mentioned once, and pattern C (Claim), G (Ground), W (Warrant), M (Modal qualifier). Furthermore, the rhetoric of the third contra speaker includes various ideas forming the first pattern C (Claim) and R (Rebuttal) 3 times, the second pattern C (Claim), G (Ground) and R (Rebuttal) twice, and the third pattern C (Claim), G (Ground), M (Modal qualifier) and R (Rebuttal) mentioned once.
References
كوين، ساميون، "المرشد في فن المناظرة نموذج بطولة العالم لمناظرات المدارس"، مؤسسة قطر للتربية والعلوم وتنمية المجتمع دولــــة قطــــــر سنة 2010
منى إبراهيم اللبودي، "الحوار – فنياته واسترايجياته وأساليب وتعليمه"، القاهرة: مكتبة وهبة، 2003
"ACTFL Pedoman Kemahiran". American Council on The Teaching of Foreign: 2012
Budiono, Tri Djoyo. "Pola Argumentasi dalam Metode Dakwah Mujadalah Nabi Ibrahim", INTELEKSIA – Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Dakwah. Volume 02 - No. 01 Juli 2020.
Burdah, Ibnu. "Melejitkan Kemampuan Bahasa Arab Aktif Melalui Strategi Debat". Lisan Arabi: Malang, 2018.
Institute for Writing & Rhetoric. "Languages", 1001 N. Fairfax ST., SUITE 200 | ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314, 2014.
Khairani Abduh, Nurul, Andoyo Sastromiharjo, dan Dadang S. Anshori. "Pola Argumentasi pada Genre Teks Eksposisi Karangan Siswa SMA". RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, Volume 12, Nomor 1, Februari 2019.
Muliarman. "KBBI; Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia". Permata Press. 2019
Keraf, Gorys. "Argumentasi dan Narasi". Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2007.
Nisa, Khoirun. "Profil kemampuan argumentasi siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ditinjau dari aktualisasi diri siswa". Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2017.
Toulmin, Stephen. "The Uses of Argument". Cambridge University Press: New York, 2003.
Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke & Allan Janik. "An Introduction to reasoning". Canada: Macmilllan Publishing Company, 1984.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. Pengajaran Gaya Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa, 2013.
Yuliati. "Penerapan metode debat pro dan kontra untuk meningkatkan proses pembelajaran PPKN". SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Vol. 15 No. 1 Tahun 2018 | 27 – 36, 2018.
Moleong, Lexy J. "Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif". Bandung: PT Remaja. Rosdakarya, 2017.
Sumarno. "Analisis Isi dalam Penelitian Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra". Jurnal Elsa, Volume 18, No. 2, September, 2020.
Rijali, Ahmad. "Analisis Data Kualitatif". Jurnal Alhadharah, Vol. 17 No. 33 Januari – Juni 2018
Wardan, Zahrotul, Wiwit, Oktavia Sulistinab, and Dedek Sukarianingsih, "Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Materi Ikatan Kimia Peserta Didik SMA, MAN, dan Perguruan Tinggi Tingkat I", J-PEK, Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 2(2), 30-40, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2023 Seif Robert Elhaq, Hanik Mahliatussikah, Kholisin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.