PRESERVATION OF ROTTERDAM FORT POST BONGAYA AGREEMENT IN MAKASSAR
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to clear analyze the existence of Fort Rotterdam and its preservation after the Bongaya agreement in Makassar. This study uses the steps in writing history, namely heuristics, criticism, interpretation and becomes a historiographical work with the literature study method. The results of this study indicate that First, Ujung Pandang Fortress have built by the Kingdom of Gowa to defend the greatness and dignity of the Gowa kingdom from colonial threats. This fort is one of the guard forts of the main fortress of Somba Opu, which is the center of the Kingdom of Gowa. After the Gowa kingdom lost the Makassar war and confirmed by the Bongaya Agreement on 18 November 1667, the Ujung Pandang fort fell into the hands of the VOC (Netherlands Indies Trade Association) and changed its name to Fort Rotterdam and as a spice-trading center from east to west. Second, the preservation of the fort after the Bongaya Agreement, namely during the Japanese occupation. The fort have used as a center for language and agricultural research activities, after that in 1973 after independence the fort changed its function as the National Institute of Antiquities and Heritage, which is currently known as the Cultural Heritage Conservation Center and Museum La Galigo.References
Dampoli, Aisyah. “Peranan Benteng Ujung Pandang dalam Sejarah Gowa”. Skripsi. Ujung Pandang: UNHAS, 1974.
Daeng Patunru, Abdul Rasak. Sejarah Gowa. Makassar: Yayasan Kebudayaan Sulawesi Selatan dan Sulawesi Tenggara, 1967.
Francois, Valentjn. verhandeling Der zee horenkens En zee gewassen in En ontrent, Amboina, Amersterdam 1726
Gunadi, ”Retrospeksi. Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Budaya: Studi Kasus tentang Upaya Pelestarian Sumberdaya Budaya di Makassar”. Kantor Wilayah Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan: Majalah Dunia Pendidikan, No 15, 16, 17, 2001.
Iqbal AM, Muhammad. Peranan dan Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Penempatan Benteng-Benteng Kerajaan Gowa Tallo. Dalam Iwan Sumantri (ed). Kepingan Mozaik Sejarah Budaya Sulawesi Selatan. Bagian Proyek Pemanfaatan Peninggalan Sejarah dan Purbakala Sulawesi Selatan, bekerja sama dengan Penerbit Ininnawa. Makassar. 2004.
Kompas, Harian. Benteng Pannyuwa, 4 Oktober 1974 h. V
Kantor Cabang II Lembaga Sejarah dan Antropologi Ujung pandang. Benteng Rotterdam. Ujung Pandang: LSA, 1975.
Lontara Kerajaan-kerajaan di Sulawesi dan Perjanjiannya dengan Kompeni-kompeni. Manuskrip. Makassar: Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
Mattulada. Menyusuri Jejak Kehadiran Makassar dalam Sejarah. Makassar: Hasanuddin University Press, 1991.
------------. “Pra Islam South Sulawesi”. dalam Universitas Hasanuddin VI-XVII (Juli 1975).
------------. Menyusuri Jejak Kehadiran Makassar dalam Sejarah 1510-1700, cet. I. Makassar: Bhakti Baru-Berita Utama. 1982.
Nuraeda, dkk., Album Sejarah dan Kepurbakalan Sul-Sel Wisata Kultural Historis. Makassar: Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Provinsi Sul-Sel, 2008.
Risang. A dan Dhani Mutiari. Karakteristik Benteng Vastenberg sebagai Bangunan Heritage di Surakarta. journal UMS, 2018.
R.P, Soejono. Sejarah Nasional Indonesia I. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1984.
Syukur, Syamzan. “Islamisasi Kedatuan Luwu pada Awal Abad XVII”. Disertasi. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2008.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
