Revisiting The Dynamics Of Gender-Based Development: An Approach to Development Studies
Abstract
The Gender Development Index in Indonesia and East Java 2019 is still below the world and national average. This shows that the equality of development between male and female in East Java is still lagging behind other provinces. The novelty of this research is trying to revisit the issue of the Gender Development Index (GDI) in East Java. This research aims to analyze the effect of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP), poor population, and Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) on the Gender Development Index (GDI) in East Java partially and simultaneously. This research uses quantitative research methods with panel data regression analysis techniques. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics in East Java during 2017-2019. The results of this research showed that the GRDP variable and poor population variable have a negative and significant effect on the Gender Development Index. Meanwhile, the LFPR variable has an insignificant and positive effect on the Gender Development Index. In addition, simultaneously the variable of GRDP, poor population, and LFPR has a significant effect on the Gender Development Index. Currently, there is still a gap between the roles of men and women. The role of women is still not optimally utilized because women's resources in the fields of health, education, and the workforce are still low. But this can be overcome if there is an increase in the labor productivity of both male and female residents so the income of the population will also increase and the number of poor people decreases. The implication of this research is the role of all parties, especially the government, is needed to pay more attention to and increase population growth and reduce poverty levels to increase gender equality in East Java.
Keywords: GRDP; Gender Development Index; Poverty
Downloads
References
Agbebi, M., Virtanen, P., 2017. Dependency Theory–A Conceptual Lens to Understand China’s Presence in Africa? Forum Dev. Stud. 44, 429–451.
Ahang, M., 2015. The impact of Gender inequality on Economic Growth in Developed Countries.
Anggraeni, R., 2020. Angka Kemiskinan Menurun, Ini Faktor Penyebabnya.
Antinori, C., Bray, D.B., 2005. Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial Firms: Economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Dev. 33, 1529–1543.
Azuri, Fitriani, D., Zulhanif, Septiani, R., 2016. Pengelompokkan Kabupaten/Kota Di Pulau Jawa Berdasarkan Pembangunan Manusia Berbasis Gender Menggunakan Bisecting K-Means. Jatinagor Pros. Semin. Nas. FMIPA Univ. Padjadjaran.
Bălan, M., 2014. Youth Labor Market Vulnerabilities, Characteristics, Dimensions And Costs. Procedia Econ. Financ. 8, 66–72.
Baqtiar, A., Murjani, A., 2017. Pengeluaran Pemerintah Daerah Pada Sektor Pendidikan, Kesehatan dan Kemiskinan Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (Studi Pada Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan). J. Transform. Adm. 07, 1689–1699.
Bastos, A., Casaca, S.F., Nunes, F., Pereirinha, J., 2009. Women and poverty: A gender-sensitive approach. J. Socio. Econ. 38, 764–778.
Berglof, E., 2015. New structural economics meets European transition. J. Econ. Policy Reform 18, 114–130.
Bhattacharya, M., 2016. Neither ‘Free’ nor ‘Equal’ Work: A Marxist-Feminist Perspective on Prostitution. Antyajaa Indian J. Women Soc. Chang. 1, 82–92.
Bieler, A., Morton, A.D., 2003. Globalisation, the State and Class Struggle: A ‘Critical Economy’ Engagement with Open Marxism . Br. J. Polit. Int. Relations 5, 467–499.
BPS, 2015. Indeks Pembangunan Gender 2014, BPS.
BPS, 2020. Kemiskinan [WWW Document]. BPS. URL https://jatim.bps.go.id/subject/23/kemiskinan-dan-ketimpangan.html (accessed 11.23.20).
Carmody, P., 1998. Neoclassical practice and the collapse of industry in Zimbabwe: The cases of textiles, clothing, and footwear. Econ. Geogr. 74, 319–343.
Colley, H., 2002. A “rough guide” to the history of mentoring from a marxist feminist perspective. J. Educ. Teach. 28, 1–14.
Darsyah, M.Y., Sara, D.S., 2016. Seemingly Unrelated Regression pada Indeks Pembangunan Gender di Jawa Tengah. J. Stat. Univ. Muhammadiyah Semarang 4.
Dewi, N., Yusuf, Y., Iyan, R., 2016. Pengaruh Kemiskinan Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Di Provinsi Riau. J. Online Mhs. Fak. Ekon. Univ. Riau 4, 870–882.
Didia, K.A., 2016. Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan di Kawasan Kedungsepur. Econ. Dev. Anal. J. 5, 101–108.
Eke Jeffry, I., 2013. Dependency Theory and Africa’s Underdevelopment: a Paradigm Shift from Pseudo-Intellectualism: the Nigerian Perspective. Int. J. African Asian Stud. Open Access Int. J. 1, 116.
Falk, A., Hermle, J., 2018. Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality. Science (80-. ). 362.
Farooq, F., Yusop, Z., Chaudhry, I.S., Iram, R., 2020. Assessing the impacts of globalization and gender parity on economic growth : empirical evidence from OIC countries 6904–6917.
Filc, D., Ram, U., 2014. Marxism after postmodernism: Rethinking the emancipatory political subject. Curr. Sociol. 62, 295–313.
Fine, B., 2013. Financialization from a Marxist Perspective. Int. J. Polit. Econ. 42, 47–66.
Gala, P., Camargo, J., Freitas, E., 2018. The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) was right: Scale-free complex networks and core-periphery patterns in world trade. Cambridge J. Econ. 42, 633–651.
Greenhill, A., Wilson, M., 2006. Haven or hell? Telework, flexibility and family in the e-society: A Marxist analysis. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 379–388.
Gujarati, D.N., Porter, D.C., 2012. Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika, 5th ed. Jakarta:Salemba Empat.
Gürkan, C., 2020. Fiscal Sociology and Veblen’s Critique of Capitalism: Insights for Social Economics and the 2008 Crisis. Sosyoekonomi 28, 295–311.
Hakiki, A., Yulmardi, Zulfanetti, 2020. Estimasi Model Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Jambi. J. Akrab Juara 5, 32–45.
Hargreaves, A., 1982. Resistance and Relative Autonomy Theories: Problems of distortion and incoherence in recent Marxist analyses of education. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 3, 107–126.
Horodecka, A., Śliwińska, M., 2019. Fair Trade phenomenon – limits of neoclassical and chances of heterodox economics. Stud. z Polityki Publicznej 3, 9–37.
Isa, M., Edward, N., 2017. Political Economy of Resource Curse and Dialectics of Crude Oil Dependency in Nigeria 14, 33–44.
Jaromír, V., 2016. Predicting Future GDP Development by Means of Artificial Intelligence. Littera Scr. 154–167.
Journal, S., Sciences, S., 2020. Postulations And Implications Of Neo- Classical Theory On Nigeria ’ S Economic Development Unemployment despite the adoption of the European models of development as 5, 1–9.
Karoui, K., Feki, R., 2018. Does gender inequality reduce growth and development economique? Evidence for a panel from African countries. Qual. Quant. 52, 2055–2061.
Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak, 2019. Pembangunan Manusia Berbasis Gender 2019.
Kerr, G., 2020. Neo-classical liberalism, ‘market freedom’, and the right to private property. Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Polit. Philos. 00, 1–22.
Klasen, S., Minasyan, A., 2017. Gender inequality and growth in Europe. Intereconomics 52, 17–23.
Kuncoro, M., 2014. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Lobao, L., 2019. Renewed significance of space in social research: implications for labor market studies. Inequalities Labor Mark. Areas 11–31.
Lowrey, Y.L., 2011. The Entrepreneur and Entrepreneurship: A Neoclassical Approach. SSRN Electron. J.
Mallorquin, C., 2017. A southern perspective on development studies: Contributions from Latin America. Cinta de Moebio 58, 26–46.
Mankiw, N.G., 2006. Teori Makro Ekonomi, 5th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Mason, R., 2017. China’s impact on the landscape of African International Relations: implications for dependency theory. Third World Q. 38, 84–96.
McCutcheon, R.S., 2015. A fun method of engaging students in the “Capitalism vs. socialism” discussion. J. Priv. Enterp. 30, 117–120.
Melkevik, Å., 2017. The fictitious liberal divide: Economic rights are not basic. Erasmus J. Philos. Econ. 10, 1–23.
Nazmi, L., Jamal, A., 2018. Pengaruh Ketimpangan Gender Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Indonesia. J. Ilm. Mhs. Ekon. Pembang. 3, 740–750.
Nevile, A., 2007. Amartya K. Sen and social exclusion. Dev. Pract. 17, 249–255.
Novtaviana, W., 2020. Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan Gender Dan Indeks Pemberdayaan Gender Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi ( PDRB) Di Indonesia Tahun 2014-2018.
Ogato, G.S., 2013. The quest for gender equality and women ’ s empowerment in least developed countries : Policy and strategy implications for achieving millennium development goals in Ethiopia 5, 358–372.
Ormaechea, E., 2020. Latin American Development: What About the State, Conflict and Power? J. Econ. Issues 54, 322–328.
Panayotakis, C., 2013. Theorizing Scarcity: Neoclassical Economics and its Critics. Rev. Radic. Polit. Econ. 45, 183–200.
Poirot, C., 2007. How can Institutional Economics be an evolutionary science? J. Econ. Issues 41, 155–179.
PUG KP DJKN, 2018. Pengarusutamaan Gender Adalah Strategi Pembangunan, Bukan Suatu Program Kegiatan [WWW Document]. URL https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/berita/baca/14857/Pengarusutamaan-Gender-Adalah-Strategi-Pembangunan-Bukan-Suatu-Program-Kegiatan.html (accessed 4.6.21).
Purcell, T.F., Fernandez, N., Martinez, E., 2017. Rents, knowledge and neo-structuralism: transforming the productive matrix in Ecuador. Third World Q. 38, 918–938.
Putri, C. Della, Fakhruddin, 2016. Ketidaksetaraan Gender Dan Kemiskinan Wilayah Aceh : Studi Komparasi Wilayah Kota Di Aceh. J. Ilm. Mhs. 1, 400–408.
Rahmawati, F., Hidayah, Z.M., 2020. Menelusur Relasi Indeks Pembangunan Gender Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. EcceS (Economics, Soc. Dev. Stud. 7, 110.
Reda, A., Reda, A., 2018. Wealth and Poverty: Neoclassical Economic Thought and Its Critics. Prophecy, Piety, and Profits 161–170.
Rioux, S., LeBaron, G., Verovšek, P.J., 2020. Capitalism and unfree labor: a review of Marxist perspectives on modern slavery. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 27, 709–731.
Rose, D., 2013. Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. The Gentrification Debates 195–210.
Rutherford, M., 2001. Institutional economics: Then and now. J. Econ. Perspect. 15, 173–194.
Safitri, L.D.A. dkk, 2020. Pemodelan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Dan Indeks Pembangunan Gender Di Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Regresi Probit Biner Bivariat. J. Mat. Stat. dan Komputasi 16, 150–161.
Samanta, A., 2018. The Political Implications of Ecology. Proc. XXIII World Congr. Philos. 129–134.
Sitorus, A.V.Y., 2016. Dampak Ketimpangan Gender terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia (The Impact of Gender Inequality in Economic Growth in Indonesia). Sosio Inf. 2, 89–101.
Suyanto, B., 2001. Kemiskinan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin. Masyarakat, Kebud. dan Polit. 14, 25–42.
Tanzeh, A., 2011. Metode Penelitian Praktis. Yogyakarta:Teras.
Tisdell, C., 2000. Asset-poor women in India and the relevance of Amartya Sen’s analysis 4, 1–21.
Todaro, M.P., Smith, S.C., 2006. Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Umiyati, E., Amril, A., Zulfanetti, Z., 2017. Pengaruh Belanja Modal, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Jumlah Penduduk Miskin Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Jambi. J. Sains Sosio Hum. 1, 29–37.
Vlados, C., 2019. Journal of Economics and Political Economy. Econ. Sci. Polit. Econ. 6, 257–280.
Wardana, D.P., 2016. Pengaruh Pembangunan Ekonomi Terhadap Pembangunan Manusia Di Kalimantan Timur. Inov. J. Ekon. Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 12, 179–191.
Woolley, F.R., 1993. The feminist challenge to neoclassical economics. Cambridge J. Econ. 17, 485–500.
