Feminine Spiritual Hermeneutics In Easter Egg and Maulid Egg; A Comparative Elaboration

Syamsul Asri

doi:10.24252/jicsa.v7i2.6833

Syamsul Asri Universitas Fajar Makassar
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jicsa.v7i2.6833

Abstrak

The main focus of this paper,comparative elaboration of Easter egg in Orthodox Christianity in Eastern Europe and Maulid egg in southern Sulawesi, become the strategic field of female engagement with their communality. The very crucial element in this brief comparison is the obvious feminine quality of both Maulid egg and Easter egg, thus both of this socio-religious practices conducted, exercised, examined by female subjects in its primer state. I construct the feminine role in Maulid egg and Easter egg through three centripetal stages in which feminine subject articulate its self-definition and self-positioning in socio-religious landscape; garden, kitchen, and public ritual occupying public sphere, all of which reflect the strategic and irreversible role and self-articulation by feminine subjects.

Referensi

Adeney-Risakotta, Bernard. (ed.), A Reader in Classical Theories for the Study of Religions in Indonesia Vol. III, ICRS, Yogyakarta, 2011.

Baum, Gregory. Religion and Alienation; A Theological Reading of Sociology, Paulist Press, New York, 1975.

Fiorenza, Elizabeth, S. Bread Not Stone; The Challenge of Feminist Biblical Interpretation, Beacon Press, 1995

Fitzgerald,Timothy. The Ideology of Religious Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.

Newall, Venetia. Easter Egg, Folklore, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Winter, 1968), Taylor & Francis, London, 1968

Newall, Venetia. Easter Egg, Folklore, Vol. 80, No. 315 (Winter, 1967), Taylor & Francis, London, 1967

Murata, Sachiko. The Tao of Islam; A Sourcebook On Gender Relationship in Islamic Thought, SUNY Press, New York, 1992

Sahab, Ahmed. What Is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2016.

Sila, Muhammad Adlin. Maudhu`: A Way of Union with God, Canberra, ANU Press, 2015

Turner, Victor. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors; Symbolic Action in Human Society, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1974.

Young, Robert J. Colonial Desire; Hybridity in Theory, Practice and Race, Routledge, London, 1995.