MOAMBONGI RONGA MONGGOLUPE: Conflict and Integration in The Tolaki People of Konawe

  • Erens Elvianus Koodoh Gadjah Mada University
    (ID)

Abstract

This study aims to identify the various socio-cultural conditions of Tolaki people in Konawe that often resulting of inter-families conflict. The process of identifying socio-cultural conditions are then directed to see the correlation between socio-cultural conditions with the types of inter-families conflict and how inter-families conflicts was resolved at the community level. In addition, this study also aimed to determine and analyze the types of inter-families conflicts that exist in the Tolaki and processes for conflict resolution among families in the Tolaki in Konawe. Perspective theory used in order to analyze the data is a conflicts perspective and family conflicts, structural functional perspective, and conflict resolution. Conflicts Perspective and family conflicts is to reveal the types of inter-families conflicts that often occurred in Tolaki people. Structural functional perspective is essentially an effort to show the functional relation between a cultural element or a socio-cultural phenomenon particular to the social structure that exists in a society. While the perspective of conflict resolution is to reveal the strategies used by the Tolaki people in the process of conflict resolution. Observation and interview is the method used in this study in order to find the data. While the research informants are divided into two categories, the key informant were traditional leaders and ordinary informants that public figures such as religious leaders, government within the scope of sub-district, village, and community members both at the level of individuals, families, and communities. Selection of traditional leaders, religious leaders, and government within the scope of sub-district and village as an informant because they are involved in conflict resolution While the selection of members of the public of the level of individuals, families, and society are because they have or are involved in a conflict. The results of this study indicate that the conflict in the Tolaki conflicts took the form of closed and open conflict. While the source or cause of the conflict is tulura (speech), peowai (actions), and powaihako (behavior). The sources of this conflict then manifested in the daily life of Tolaki people become sisala'a ine perapua (conflict in marriage), sisala'a ine Hapo- Hapo (conflict by treasure), and conflict in social relations. Social and cultural conditions that often lead to inter-families conflicts is the difference in social strata, economic inequality, and religious differences. Tolaki People then settle their conflict through the completion of melanggahako, mesokei, peohala, mombopoo'rai, sombalabu, and mosehe.

References

Ahimsa-Putra. S. Heddy. 1999. “Cara-cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa dalam Masyarakat Pedesaan di Indonesia”. Unisia. 40 (XXII/IV) : 141-173

Bachtiar. W. Harsja. 1997. “Pengamatan Sebagai Suatu Metode Penelitian”. dalam Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat, Edisi Ketiga. Koentjaraningrat (Ed). Jakarta. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Bartos. J. Otomar. dan Paul Wehr, 2002, Using Conflict Theory. Cambridge UK. Cambridge University Press

Brown. R. A. R. 1965. Structure and Function in Primitive Society, Essays and Addresses. New York. The Free Press

Chua. L. Amy. 1999. “Markets, Democracy, and Ethnic Conflict”. Dalam Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 93 : 1-5

Davidson. S. Jamie. 2007. “Culture and Rights in Ethnic Violence” dalam The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics : The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indiginism. Jamie S. Davidson, David Henley (Eds). New York. Routledge

Fisher. S, Dekha I. Abdi, Richard S, Jawed L, Steve W, dan Sue W. 2001. Mengelola Konflik : Ketrampilan dan Strategi untuk Bertindak. Jakarta. SMK Grafika Desa Putra

Haryanto. S. 2012. Spektrum Teori Sosial, Dari Klasik Hingga Postmodern. Yogyakarta. Ar-Ruzz Media

Hassan. F. dan Koentjaraningrat. 1997. “Beberapa Azas Metodologi Ilmiah”. dalam Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Edisi Ketiga. Koentjaraningrat (Ed). Jakarta. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Hasrullah. 2009. Dendam Konflik Poso (Periode 1998 – 2001), Konflik Poso dari Perspektif Komunikasi Politik. Jakarta. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Jones. P. 2009. Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial, Dari Teori Fungsionalisme Hingga Post-Modernisme. Alih Bahasa : Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin. Jakarta. Yayasan Obor Indonesia

Karnavian. M. Tito. Idham. A, Herry R. Nahak, Reza A. Dewanto, Samuel T. Toding, Iver S. Manossoh, Surato, Sri W. 2008, Indonesian Top Secret, Membongkar Konflik Poso, Jakarta, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Koentjaraningrat. 1997. “Metode Wawancara”. dalam Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Koentjaraningrat (Ed). Edisi Ketiga. Jakrta. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Li. T. M. 2007. “Adat in Central Sulawesi : Contemporary Deployments” dalam The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics : The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indiginism. Jamie S. Davidson, David Henley (Eds). New York. Routledge

Maunati. Y. 2006. Identitas Dayak, Komodifikasi dan Politik Kebudayaan, Yogyakarta. LkiS Pelangi Aksara

Oberschall. A. 1978. “Theories of Social Conflict”. Annual Review of Sociology. 4 : 291-315

Poloma. M. Margaret. 2010. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Penerjemah : Tim Yasogama. Jakarta. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada

Pruitt. G. Dean. dan Jeffrey Z. Rubin. 2009. Teori Konflik Sosial. Penerjemah : Helly P. Soetjipto dan Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar

Pruitt. G. Dean. dan Sung H. Kim. 2004. Social Conflict : Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. Third Edition. New York. McGraw-Hill

Ritzer. G. 2012. Teori Sosiologi Dari Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan terakhir Postmodern. Alih Bahasa: Saut Pasaribu, Rh. Widada, dan Eka Adinugraha. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sangaji. A. 2007. “The Masyarakat Adat Movement in Indonesia : A Critical Insider’s View”. Dalam The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics : The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indiginism. Jamie S. Davidson, David Henley (Eds). New York. Routledge

Schruder. W. Ingo. dan Bettina E. Schmidt. 2001. “Violent Imaginaries and Violent Practices” dalam Anthropology of Violence and Conflict. Bettina E. Schmidt dan Ingo W. Schruder (Eds). London and New York. Routledge

Suparlan. P. 1993. “Masyarakat Sakai di Riau”. dalam Masyarakat Terasing di Indonesia. Koentjaraningrat (ed). Jakarta. Diterbitkan atas kerjasama Departemen Sosial dan Dewan Nasional Indonesia untuk Kesejahteraan Sosial dengan PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Susan. N. 2012. Negara Gagal Mengelola Konflik, Demokrasi dan Tata Kelola Konflik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta. Kerjasama KoPi dan Pustaka Pelajar

Susan. N. 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-Isu Konflik Kontemporer. Yogyakarta. Kencana

Tomagola. A. Tamrin. 2006. Republik Kapling. Yogyakarta. Resist Book.

Trijono. L. 2006. “Konflik dan Prospek Perdamaian di Poso”. Dalam Fenomena Konflik Sosial di Indonesia : dari Aceh sampai Papua. Koeswinarno dan Dudung Abdurahman (Ed). Yogyakarta. Lembaga Penelitian UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Tumanggor. R. 2006. “Pemetaan Konflik di Maluku : Ambon”. Dalam Fenomena Konflik Sosial di Indonesia : dari Aceh sampai Papua. Koeswinarno dan Dudung Abdurahman (Ed). Yogyakarta. Lembaga Penelitian UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Turner. H. Jonathan. dan Alexandra M. 2010. Fungsionalisme. Penerjemah : Anwar Efendi. dkk. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar

Van Klinken. G. 2007. Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia : Small Town Wars. New York. Rotledge

Waileruny. S. 2010. Membongkar Konspirasi di Balik konflik Maluku. Jakarta. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia

Williams. Jr. R. M. 1970. “Social Order and Social Conflict”. dalam: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 114. (3) : 217-225

Published
2018-02-22
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 251 times