Checklist Method in Evaluation of Collection Development
Abstract
This study aims to identify and analyze the availability of a collection of compulsory subject teaching materials in the Library Science study program at UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. This quantitative research uses the checklist method. The research data was obtained from the RPKS/Syllabus reading list for compulsory subjects and interviews. The results of this study include an explanation of the collection based on the type of subject of the collection, the language of the collection, and the percentage of the availability of the collection to the needs of Lecturers at the Faculty of Adab and Humanities UIN Imam Bonjol. The results of this study indicate that the types of collections used in the 2018/2021 Academic Year are 75% of English Language Textbooks and Special Guidelines related to Library Science, especially in Processing Collections both Internationally and from the National Library. Data analysis shows that the number of reading lists of 20 compulsory subjects in the study program is 172 titles, with an average of 1-2 copies originating from purchases and gifts if more than 10 copies. Document data analysis resulted in the number of available reading lists in 20 courses, with the number of available collections being 37.2% and not available as much as 62.7%.
Downloads
References
Adams, B., & Bob, N. (2008). Circulation Statistics in The Evaluation Of Colection Development. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Cahyani, A. D., & Christiani, L. (2015, Pengaruh Ketersedian Koleksi Terhadap Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Informasi Siswa di Perpustakaan SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan). Pengaruh Ketersedian Koleksi Terhadap Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Informasi Siswa di Perpustakaan SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 4(2).
Chin, R. A. (1999). Desseminatng, Archiving, and Retrieving New Knowledge in Industrial Technology: Implication For The Discipline and NAIT”. Jurnal of industrial technology, 15(2).
Darmono. (2001). Manajemen dan Tata Kerja Perpustakaan Sekolah . Jakarta: Grasindo.
Globe, F. G. (1989). Mahzab Ketiga, Psikologi Humanistik Abraham Maslow. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Greer, R., & Hale, M. L. (1985). Models Related To Community Analisys. Offset.
Grover, R. J., Greer, R. C., & Aganda, J. (2010). Assesing Information Needs: Managing Transformative Library Service. California: Library Unlimited.
Halling, D. (n.d.). Research Guides: Guide to Citation Anaysis. Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=565010&p=3891782
Istiana, P., & Zulaikha, S. R. (2007). Analisis Sitiran Terhadap Skripsi Jurusan Kartografi dan Penginderaan Jauh Fakultas Geografi Tahun 2005 dan Ketersediaanya di Perpustakaan Fakultas Geografi UGM. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 3(6).
Johnson, P. (2004). Fundamentals Of Collection Development and Management. Chicago: American Library Association.
Johnson, P. (2009). Fundamentals Of Collection Depelopment and Management. Chicago: American Library Association.
Maryam, S. (1999). Upaya Mencari Solusi Pengembangan Koleksi di Perpustakaan IAIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Jurnal Almaktabah, 1(2).
Montviloff, V. (1990). National Information Policies: A Handbook On The Formulation, Approval, Implementation and Operation Of a Oational Policy On Information. Paris: UNESCO.
Nicholas, D. (2005). Assesing Information Needs: Tools, Teqniques and Conceps For The Internet Age. London: Aslib.
Qalyubi, Syihabuddin; Dkk. (2007). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Short, G. (n.d.). LibGuides: Scholarly Impact and Citation Analysis: What Is Citation Analysis? Retrieved September 11, 2018, from
https://osu.libguides.com/oardc/citation_analysis/whatis
Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perpustakaan.
Yusuf, P. M. (2010). Teori dan Praktik Penelusuran Informasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License