Controversy Over Non-Madhhab Practices
A Critical Analysis of the Perspective of Ramadhan Al-Buthy about Contemporary Islamic Law
Abstract
This study aims to thoroughly examine the dangers associated with not adhering to a specific madhhab in contemporary Islamic law from the perspective of Muhammad Sa'id Ramadhan Al-Buthy. In order to accurately achieve the study objective, a comprehensive examination of Al-Buthy’s critique concerning non-madhhab practices was carried out, with a primary focus on how these practices could disrupt legal interpretations and undermine the authority of Islamic jurisprudence. The analysis included the process of reviewing primary texts, scholarly commentaries, and secondary literature, all of which were carried out with the aim of accurately comparing the critique by Al-Buthy with other contemporary perspectives on the issue. The results showed that Al-Buthy strongly criticized non-madhhab movement for promoting subjective and inconsistent interpretations of Islamic law. The figure argued that this movement was capable of weakening the structured and scholarly tradition of Islamic jurisprudence. Furthermore, Al-Buthy emphasized that established madhhab played a very important role in preserving the integrity and continuity of Islamic legal principles, underscoring the dangers associated with abandoning these schools, including fragmentation and a lack of authoritative guidance. The critique of the observed figure typically emphasizes the risks of non-madhhab practices, such as the potential for division in Muslim community. This study makes a novel contribution by specifically focusing on Al-Buthy’s critique, which are often cited but not deeply analyzed in the context of non-madhhab movements. Specifically, the investigation situated the arguments of the observed figure in contemporary debates on the role of madhhab, thereby offering a fresh perspective on the relationship between traditional Islamic jurisprudence and modern legal challenges. The implications are particularly significant for scholars, legal practitioners, and policymakers in Islamic law, advocating for a renewed commitment to traditional legal frameworks to prevent the pitfalls of subjective interpretations associated with non-madhhab methodologies.
References
Al-Azem, T. (2021). Conscience and Action in the Islamic Madhhab-Law Tradition. In Rules and ethics (pp. 190–210). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526148919.00017
Al-Farsi, K. (2022). Exploring Sharia Law in Islamic Jurisprudence. Social Science Chronicle, 1(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2022.009
Albelahi, A. M. A., Ali, A., Mohmed, F., & Ali, M. (2018). The theory of interpretation in solving contemporary legal issues: With a focus on the instrument of ijtihad. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 5056. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005056
Ammerman, N. T. (2020). Rethinking religion: Toward a Practice Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 126(1), 6–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/709779
Arifin, Z., & Haqqi, A. R. A. (2024). Islamic Law: Between Revelation and Human Thoughts. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 26(1), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol26no1.9
Arjana, S. R. (2016). The Study of Shi ‘i Islam: History, Theology and Law; History, Theology, and Law By Farhad Daftary and Gurdofarid Miskinzoda, eds. (New York: I.B. Tauris, 2014. 616 pages.). American Journal of Islam and Society, 33(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v33i1.892
Azamat, A., Kairat, A., & Ajzhan, C. (2022). Some Points of View Regarding Human Rights in Islamic Law. The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal, 278.
Bashayreh, M. (2022). The Authority of Judges under Shariah: Perspectives on Recent Legal Reforms in Saudi Arabia. J. Int’l L. Islamic L., 18(2), 42–67.
Bitar, M., Hassan, M. K., & Walker, T. (2017). Political Systems and the Financial Soundness of Islamic Banks. Journal of Financial Stability, 31, 18–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.06.002
Brown, J. A. C. (2016). Reaching into the Obscure Past: The Islamic Legal Heritage and Reform in the Modern Period. In Reclaiming Islamic Tradition: Modern Interpretations of the Classical Heritage. In Modern Interpretations of the Classical Heritage (pp. 100–135). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474403122-007
Bruce, T. (2018). New Technologies, Continuing Ideologies: Online Reader Comments as a Support for Media Perspectives of Minority Religions. Discourse, Context & Media, 24, 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.10.001
Chizari, N. (2024). Determining Taftāzānī’s madhhab: Insights after the Decline Paradigm. Darulfunun Ilahiyat, 35(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2023.34.2.1296825
Cohen, A. B., Wu, M. S., & Miller, J. (2016). Religion and Culture: Individualism and Collectivism in the East and West. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(9), 1236–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116667895
De Donno, G., Giunta, E., El-far, M., & Shehata, J. (2018). The Role of Shari’a as a Source of Law: Looking for a Pragmatic Approach. JUS, 1, 375–415. https://iris.unibocconi.it/handle/11565/4046131
DeLong-Bas, N. J. (2022). Wahhabism and Salafism in Global Perspective In: Wahhabism and the World. Edited by: Peter Mandaville. In Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197532560.003.0002
Elmahjub, E. (2021). Islamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse: An Enquiry into the Nature of Moral Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
Fidiana, F. (2020). Compliance Behaviour from the Holistic Human Nature Perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(5), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2016-0142
Gad Makhlouf, A. (2021). The Doctrinal Development of Contemporary Islamic Law: Fiqh Academies as an Institutional Framework. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(3), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac005
Gad Makhlouf, A. (2023). Continuity and Change of Traditional Islamic Law in Modern Times: tarjīḥ as a Method of Adaptation and Development of Legal Doctrines. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad010
Ghanem, T. (2020). Texts, Language, and History in the Madhab-Law Tradition: A Study of the Shāfiʿī School [The American University in Cairo]. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1605
Gould, R. (2015). Ijtihād against Madhhab: Legal hybridity and the meanings of modernity in early modern Daghestan. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000590
Graf, A. (2016). Malaysia’s Niche in International Higher Education: Targeting Muslim-majority, Commonwealth, and Less-developed Countries. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 4(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2015.16
Halim, F. A. (2015). Reformulating the Madhhab in Cyberspace: Legal Authority, Doctrines, and Ijtihād among Contemporary Shāfiʿī ʿUlamāʾ. Islamic Law and Society, 22(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00224p04
Ismail, N. (2019). The Mufti and the State Administration of Islam: Some Selected Fatwas in Contemporary Perlis, Malaysia (Mufti dan Pentadbiran Islam Negeri: Beberapa Fatwa Terpilih di Perlis, Malaysia). Journal of Islam in Asia, 16(3), 344–373. https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v16i3.806
Jahangir, H., & Pakeeza, S. (2022). Rapprochement Strategies in Islamic Madhāhib. AL-Qalam, 27(2), 1–27. http://www.alqalamjournalpu.com/index.php/Al-Qalam/article/view/2127
Jamaluddin, S., Djakat, M., Hidayatussalam, H., & Samin, S. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of the implementation of Islamic Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 2177–2186. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i5.4930
Jany, J. (2020). Legal Traditions in Asia: History, Concepts and Laws. In Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice (pp. 163–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2
Kamali, M. H. (2016). Caliphate and Political Jurisprudence in Islam: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. The Muslim World, 106(2), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12145
Khan, P. (2021). An outlook from Historical Review of Imam Malik Ibn Anas’s Principles of Instruction and Classroom Management (715-795). Al-Azhār, 7(02), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.46896/alazhr.v7i02.241
Kizilkaya, N. (2020). Scholarship and Education in Islamic Law and Economics: The Challenges of Comparative Law (Fiqh al-Muqāran). Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 7(2), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.26414/A188
Mohiuddin, A. (2023). Religious Authority in Islam: Resilient Patterns of Evolution From the Formative Period to Contemporary Times. In Navigating Religious Authority in Muslim Societies: Islamist Movements and the Challenge of Globalisation (pp. 117–163). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-44825-6_4
Moustafa, T., & Sachs, J. A. (2018). Law and society review special issue introduction: Islamic law, society, and the state. Law & Society Review, 52(3), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12360
Muhammadin, F. (2020). Fiqh Al-Jihād In The Contemporary World: Addressing The Gaps In The Regulations On The Means And Methods Of Warfare [International Islamic University Malaysia]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690225
Murphy, A. M. (2020). Islam in Indonesian Foreign Policy: The Limits of Muslim Solidarity for the Rohingya and Uighurs. Asan Institute for Policy Studies, 6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27633
Oluwaseun, S. S. (2022). An Examination of The Major Madhhabs: A Case for Reunification. Journal of Shariah Law Research, 7(2), 161–184. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JSLR/article/view/40856
Pakeeza, S., & Jahangir, H. (2023). Unification of Muslim Ummah: An Impetus to Religious Harmony. OEconomia, 6(2), 200–230. https://oeconomiajournal.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/66
Peters, R. (2020). What Does It Mean to Be an Official Madhhab?: Hanafism and the Ottoman Empire. In Shariʿa, Justice and Legal Order (pp. 585–599). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004420625_032
Picken, G. N. (2015). The Concept of sunna in the Early Shāfi‘ī Madhhab BT - The Sunna and its Status in Islamic Law: The Search for a Sound Hadith. In A. Duderija (Ed.), Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History (pp. 139–162). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137369925_8
Pill, S. C. (2018). Knowing Shari’ah Law: Epistemology and Indeterminacy in Islamic Jurisprudence. Chi.-Kent J. Int’l & Comp. L., 18, 1.
Pitlik, H., & Rode, M. (2017). Individualistic Values, Institutional Trust, and Interventionist Attitudes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(3), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000564
Powell, E. J. (2022). Complexity and Dissonance: Islamic Law States and the International Order. International Studies Review, 24(1), viac001. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac001
Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2017). Judging the judiciary by the numbers: Empirical research on judges. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032
Rafay, A., Sadiq, R., & Ajmal, M. (2016). Fragmentation of Islamic Financial Products–an Exploratory Study of Islamic Schools of Thought. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, Special Is, 48–61. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2790458
Ramadhan, M. (2020). Feedback Ali Abdul Raziq System Of Khilafah: Concept Analysis Ala Ali Abdul Raziq State And Its Relevance Democracy In Indonesia. Global Jurnal Al-Thaqafah, 10(10), 1–27.
Sebastian, L. C., & Othman Alkaff, S. H. Bin. (2024). Ideologies and Their Importance in Shaping Islam, Muslims, and Activism in Indonesia. In Indonesia and Islam in Transition (pp. 71–131). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-1140-6_3
Suhadi, Mashdurohatun, A., & Gunarto. (2022). Reconstruction of Indonesian Islamic Law Compilation Using Madhhab Perspective Based on Justice Value. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(3), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i03.005
Vanberg, G. (2015). Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161150
Wahid, S. H. (2024). Research Insights on Online Fatwas. A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 29(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol29no1.570
Zartman, I. W., & Zartman, I. W. (2019). Dynamics and Constraints in Negotiating Internal Conflicts. A Pioneer in Conflict Management and Area Studies: Essays on Contention and Governance, 23, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06079-4_9
Zubair, S., & Zubair, M. (2017). Situating Islamic Feminism (s): Lived Religion, Negotiation of Identity and Assertion of Third Space by Muslim Women in Pakistan. Women’s Studies International Forum, 63, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.06.002
Бектенова, М., Сейтахметова, Н., & Токтарбекова, Л. (2021). The Phenomenon of Islamic Identity in The Religious and Cultural Context of Islamic Philosophy. Адам Әлемі, 88(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.48010/2021.2/1999-5849.12
Copyright (c) 2024 Hamzah Abed Alkarim Hammad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.