PLACE ATTACHMENT ABDI DAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PURI UBUD DI KABUPATEN GIANYAR, BALI
Abstract
Abstrak_Place attachment sebagai bentuk keterikatan individu terhadap suatu tempat pada umumnya bisa diwujudkan ke dalam ikatan batin, makna, kepuasan, serta ikatan sosial yang dapat dilihat dari perlakuan seseorang terhadap objek yang berada di sekitarnya. Puri Saren Agung Ubud sebagai salah satu destinasi pariwisata berskala internasional memiliki kecenderungan untuk berkembang dan berubah mengikuti kebutuhannya, termasuk ancaman invasi terhadap karakter dan identitas budaya lokal di kawasan Ubud. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji sejauh mana place attachment terhadap Puri Saren Agung Ubud masih dimiliki oleh abdi (pegawai puri) dan masyarakat di sekitarnya, beserta jenis keterikatannya. Penentuan responden dilakukan dengan pendekatan purposive sampling pada dua kategori yang berbeda, yaitu internal user (abdi) dan surrounding community (masyarakat) yang memiliki keragaman jenis kelamin, usia, tugas dan tanggung jawab/ pekerjaan, serta lama bekerja/ tinggal di sekitar Puri Saren Agung Ubud berdasarkan variabel Place Attachment, meliputi: Place Identity, Place Dependence, Social Bond, dan Architecture. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterikatan terhadap Puri Saren Agung Ubud lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh makna dan keterikatannya; keindahan, kenyamanan, dan kepuasan; serta kenangan dan ikatan khusus yang dihadirkan oleh Puri Saren Agung Ubud. Selain itu ikatan yang terbentuk pada masing-masing penggunanya memiliki tingkatan yang berbeda. Jenis keterikatan abdi terhadap Puri Saren Agung Ubud lebih bersifat ikatan batin dan emosional, sementara keterikatan yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat lebih bersifat kepentingan ekonomi dari keberadaan Puri Saren Agung Ubud sebagai salah satu destinasi pariwisata. Sekalipun demikian, tanggung jawab secara adat untuk menjaga kelestarian dan eksistensi Puri Saren Agung Ubud masih dimiliki oleh abdi dan masyarakat di sekitarnya.
Kata kunci: Puri Saren Agung Ubud; Place Attachment; Abdi; Masyarakat; Variabel Arsitektur.
Abstract_ Place attachment as a form of individual or group attachment toward a place, in general, can be manifested into an inner bonding, meaning, satisfaction, and social bonding that can be seen from one's treatment to the objects around them. Puri Saren Agung in Ubud as an international tourism destination has a tendency to develop and change to meet its needs, including the threat of invasion of local cultural character and identity in the Ubud area. This research was conducted for assessing to what extent place attachment to Puri Saren Agung in Ubud is still owned by Abdi (internal user) and the surrounding community, along with the type of attachment. Respondent determination was done by using purposive sampling approach in two different categories, namely internal user (Abdi) and surrounding communities that have a diversity in sex, age, duties and responsibilities/jobs, the length of working/staying around Puri Saren Agung in Ubud based on Place Attachment variables, including Place Identity, Place Dependence, Social Bond, and Architecture. The results showed that the attachment to Puri Saren Agung in Ubud is more influenced by its meaning and attachment; beauty, comfort, and satisfaction; as well as memories and special bond presented by Puri Saren Agung Ubud. Besides, the bonds that are formed in each user have a different level. The type of Abdi's attachment to Puri Saren Agung in Ubud is more of an inner and emotional bond, while the attachment held by the community is more of economic interest from the existence of Puri Saren Agung in Ubud as a tourism destination. Even so, customary responsibility for maintaining the preservation and existence of Puri Saren Agung in Ubud still belongs to Abdi (internal user) and the surrounding community.
Keywords: Puri Saren Agung in Ubud; Place Attachment; Abdi (Internal User); Surrounding Community; Architectural Variable.
Downloads
References
Altman, Irwin, dan Setha M. Low. Human Behavior and Environment: Advance in Theory and Research (Place Attachment). New York: Plenum Press, 1992.
Altman, Irwin, Amos Rapoport, dan Joachim F Wohlwill. Human Behaviour and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research (Environment and Culture). New York: Plenum Press., 1980.
Ching, Francis D.K. Architecture (Form, Space, & Order). 4 ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015.
Counted, Victor, dan Fraser Watts. “Place Attachment in the Bible : The Role of Attachment to Sacred Places in Religious Life.” Journal of Psychology & Theology 45, no. 3 (2017): 218–32.
Ernawati, Jenny. “Pengaruh Aspek Arsitektur dan Perencanaan Kota Terhadap Terbentuknya Ikatan Batin Dengan Suatu Tempat ( Place attachment ).” Review of Urbanism of Architectural Studies 12, no. 1 (2014): 76–90.
Giuliani, Maria V. “Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment.” Psycological theories for environmental issues, 2003, 137–70.
Goussous, Jawdat S., dan Nessma A. Al-hammadi. “Place Attachment Assessment of a Heritage Place: A Case Study of The Roman Amphitheater in Downtown Amman, Jordan.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 7, no. 1 (2018): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2017.12.001.
Kyle, Gerard, Alan Graefe, dan Robert Manning. “Testing The Dimensionality of Place Attachment in Recreational Settings.” Environment and Behavior 37, no. 2 (2005): 153–77. doi:10.1177/0013916504269654.
Mazumdar, Shampa, dan Sanjoy Mazumdar. “Religion and Place Attachment: A study of Sacred Places.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, no. 3 (2004): 385–97. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.005.
Mina, Najafi, dan Mustafa Kamal. “Place Attachment to Contemporary Public-Funded Mosques in Malaysia.” Alam Cipta 5, no. 2 (2012): 65–76.
Najafi, Mina, dan Mustafa Kamal. “Factors Influencing Public Attachment to Mosques in Malaysia.” International Journal of Architectural Research 5, no. 3 (2011): 7–24.
———. “Public Attachment to Religious Places: A Study of Place Attachment to Mosques in Malaysia.” International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 8, no. 1 (2014): 284–95.
———. “The Concept of Place and Sense of Place In Architectural Studies.” International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5, no. 8 (2011): 1054–60.
Nurhijrah. “Kerangka Penelitian Place Attachment pada Tempat-tempat Bernilai Budaya.” In Temu Ilmiah IPLBI, 89–94. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2015.
———. “Place Attachment Masyarakat Tana Luwu pada Ruang Publik Dekker.” In Seminar Nasional - Semesta Arsitektur Nusantara 3, 1–7. Malang: Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Brawijaya, 2015.
———. “Place Attachment of Youth Peoples in Tana Luwu towards Historical Sites of Kedatuan Luwu.” In 6th Arte-Polis International Conference-"Imagining Experiences: Creative Tourism and The Making of Place", 1–7. Bandung: Bandung Institute of Technology, 2016.
Putri, Ni Putu Ratih Pradnyaswari Anasta. “Perkembangan Arsitektur pada Palebahan di Puri Agung Peliatan Ubud, Gianyar.” Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 2016.
Sattarzadeh, Dariush. “The Effect of Designing Urban Public Spaces on Place Attachment (Case study: Tabriz , Iran).” Space Ontology International Journal 7, no. 4 (2018): 53–64.
Scannell, Leila, dan Robert Gifford. “Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, no. 1 (2010): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
Sulistiani, Melinda. “Studi Temporalitas Ruang terhadap Place Attachment pada Coworking Space di Surabaya.” Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya, 2018.
Williams, Daniel R., Michael E. Patterson, dan Joseph W. Roggenbuck. “Beyond The Commodity Metaphor: Examining Emotional and Symbolic Attachment to Place.” Leisure Science 14 (1992): 29–46.
Copyright (c) 2019 Eko Widodo, Diananta Pramitasari, Syam Rachma Marcillia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License
