WIFI SCANNER FOR OBTAINING PEDESTRIAN DATA

  • Arief Hidayat Transportation Planning Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo University of Science (TUS), 2641 Yamazaki, Noda 278-8510, Japan
    (JP) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-6747
  • Shintaro Terabe Transportation Planning Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo University of Science (TUS), 2641 Yamazaki, Noda 278-8510, Japan
    (JP)
  • Hideki Yaginuma Transportation Planning Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo University of Science (TUS), 2641 Yamazaki, Noda 278-8510, Japan
    (JP)

Abstract

Recently, many technologies to estimate pedestrian data to know about pedestrian travel behavior. Wifi is one of the most useful technologies that can be used in counting pedestrian data. This paper described using of WiFi scanner which carried out seven times circulated the bus. The method used WiFi and GPS are to counting MAC address as raw data from pedestrian smartphone or WiFi devices nearfrom the bus as long as the bus going around the route, generate and processing to be pedestrian data. There are five processes to make pedestrian data from raw data. The purpose of this study is to calculate, obtain and estimate the number of pedestrian data divide circulation number and road segmentation. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Arief Hidayat, Transportation Planning Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo University of Science (TUS), 2641 Yamazaki, Noda 278-8510, Japan
Dr-Eng Student
Shintaro Terabe, Transportation Planning Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo University of Science (TUS), 2641 Yamazaki, Noda 278-8510, Japan
Professor
Hideki Yaginuma, Transportation Planning Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo University of Science (TUS), 2641 Yamazaki, Noda 278-8510, Japan
Associate Professor

References

Abedi, N., Bhaskar, A., & Chung, E. (2013). Bluetooth and Wi-Fi MAC Address Based Crowd Data Collection and Monitoring : Benefits , Challenges and Enhancement. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2013 Proceedings 2, (October), 1–17. Retrieved from http://www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx

Böhm, M. F., Ryeng, E. O., Haugen, T., & (AET), A. for E. T. (2016). Evaluating the Usage of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Based Sensors for Pedestrian Counting in Urban Areas. European Transport Conference, 24p–24p. Retrieved from http://abstracts.aetransport.org/paper/index/id/4988/confid/21%5Cnhttps://trid.trb.org/view/1442384

Dunlap, M., Li, Z., Henrickson, K., & Wang, Y. (2016). Estimation of Origin and Destination Information from Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Sensing for Transit. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, (2595), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3141/2595-02

Fukuzaki, Y., Mochizuki, M., Murao, K., & Nishio, N. (2014). A Pedestrian Flow Analysis System using Wi-Fi Packet Sensors to a Real Environment. Proceedings of UbiComp-Adjunct, 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641312

Hamacher, H. W., Heller, S., & Ruzika, S. (2011). Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. PED 2010 Conference Proceedings, 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9725-8

Heuvel, T. and H. (2016). Advances in Measuring Pedestrians at Dutch Train Stations Using Bluetooth, WiFi and Infrared Technology, (October), 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33482-0

Jackson, S. (2014). Towards a WIFI system for traffic monitoring in different transportation facilities. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting. January 12-16, Washington, D.C., (January), 1–19.

Lesani, A. (2016). Development and Testing of a Real-Time WiFi-Bluetooth System for Pedestrian Network Monitoring and Data Extrapolation, (January), 1–13.

Malinovskiy, Y., Saunier, N., & Wang, Y. (2012). Pedestrian Travel Analysis Using Static Bluetooth Sensors. Transportation Research Record, 2299, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3141/2299-15

Nagano Prefecture Goverment. (2016). Obuse TouristGuide. Retrieved from http://www.obusekanko.jp/download/pdf/english_s.pdf

Nishide, R., & Takada, H. (2013). Detecting Pedestrian Flows on a Mobile Ad Hoc Network and Issues with Trends and Feasible Applications, 6(1), 108–117.

Petre, A. (2016). WiFi tracking of pedestrian behavior Principles of WiFi tracking, 1–24.

Poucin, G., Farooq, B., & Patterson, Z. (2016). Pedestrian Activity Pattern Mining in WiFi-Network Connection Data. Trb, (August 2015), 20p. Retrieved from https://trid.trb.org/view/1394184

Raspberry. (2015a). RASPBERRY PI 2 MODEL B. Retrieved from https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-2-model-b/

Raspberry. (2015b). Raspberry Pi 2 Model B 1GB Technical Specifications. Retrieved from https://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-73827/l/raspberry-pi-2-model-b-1gb-technical-specifications#techspecs

Schauer, L., Werner, M., & Marcus, P. (2014). Estimating Crowd Densities and Pedestrian Flows Using Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.mobiquitous.2014.257870

Shlayan, N., Kurkcu, A., & Ozbay, K. (2016). Exploring pedestrian bluetooth and WiFi detection at public transportation terminals. IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795559

Wikipedia. (2008). Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obuse,_Nagano

Xu, Z., Sandrasegaran, K., Kong, X., Zhu, X., Zhao, J., Hu, B., & Chung Lin, C.-. (2013). Pedestrain Monitoring System using Wi-Fi Technology And RSSI Based Localization. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 5(4), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijwmn.2013.5402

Published
2017-10-30
How to Cite
Hidayat, A., Terabe, S., & Yaginuma, H. (2017). WIFI SCANNER FOR OBTAINING PEDESTRIAN DATA. Plano Madani : Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 6(2), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpm.v6i2.3224
Section
ARTICLES
Abstract viewed = 1032 times