TINJAUAN HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PERMOHONAN IZIN POLIGAMI KARENA KETIDAKMAMPUAN PELAYANAN KEBUTUHAN SEKSUAL

  • Muh Zuhdi Hamdi Fahmi Prodi HKI FSH UINAM
    (ID)
  • Asni
    (ID)
  • Musyfikah Ilyas
    (ID)

Abstract

Abstract

The main problem that will be studied in this research is the application for a polygamy permit on the grounds of inability to serve sexual needs (Study Decision Number: 663/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Mrs.). in deciding on case Number: 663/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Mrs. then the second sub-problem is how to review Islamic law on the decision Number: 663/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Mrs. The type of research used is a type of Field Research or field research carried out at the Maros Religious Court. This research is also a qualitative research using a normative juridical approach and other legal approaches. The data sources in this study are sourced from primary data and secondary data, then the data is collected through interview and documentation methods. The results of this study indicate: that the judge's legal considerations in deciding case Number 663/Pdt.G/2020/PA Mrs regarding the granting of a polygamy permit are that the applicant has fulfilled faculative reasons according to the provisions of Article 4 paragraph (2) letter (a) in conjunction with Article 57 letter (a). In addition, the applicant has also fulfilled the cumulative requirements in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (2) and Article 58 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The judge was of the opinion that the reason for polygamy is because of the inability to serve the husband's sexual needs, and the wife cannot carry out her obligations as a wife. Second, the Panel of Judges in making the decision was also guided by Islamic law, namely QS Al-Nisa/4: 3. And also in accordance with fiqh which reads Avoiding mafsadat must take precedence over attracting benefit. The implication of this research is in handling cases related to polygamy permit applications to be more careful and thorough in deciding a case because in this case it can be a legal loophole for a husband to be free to practice polygamy. For people who want to do polygamy, it is expected to think carefully mature before committing polygamy, because later you will be faced with greater responsibilities. If you feel you are unable to act fairly and are unable to meet the needs of your wives and children, then it is enough to marry only one woman, because this is an unjust act. .

Keywords: Polygamy, Judge’s Decision, Islamic Law.

References

Daftar Pustaka

Buku

Ar-Raudi, M. Maftuhin. Kaidah Fqih Menjawab Problematika Sepanjang Jalan, Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2015.

HR, Hamim dan Ahmad Muntaha. Pengantar Kaidah Fikih Syafiiyah: Penjelas Nazhm al-Fara’id al-Bahiyah, Kediri: Santri Salaf Press, 2013.

Kementrian Agama RI. Al-Qura’an dan Terjemahan, 2022.

Putusan No. 663/Pdt.G/2020/Pa Mrs.

Tihami, dan Sohari Sahrani, Fikih Munakahat: Kajian Fikih Nikah Lengkap, Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2014.

Jurnal

Alwi, Zulfahmi. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Tentang Tradisi Mabollo dalam Adat Perkawinan Bugis”. Qadauna Volume 2 No.2, (Desember, 2021). h.104.

Chotbah, Sippah. “Nilai Keadilan dalam Syariat Poligami”. Jurnal Al-Qadau Volume 4 No. 1 (Juni 2017). h.174.

Hamdun , Ibnu dan Muh. Saleh Ridwan “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Tentang Dampak Poligami Terhadap Istri di Kabupaten Gowa”. Qadauna Volume 1 No. 1 (Desember, 2019). h. 35.

Hasbi, dkk. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Pemberian Izin Poligami Menurut Undang-Undang RI No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan ( Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa)”. Jurnal Al-Qadau Volume 8 No.1 (Juni, 2021). h.103.

HL, Rahmatiah, “Studi Kasus Perkawinan Di Bawah Umur”. al-daulah Volume 5 No. 1 (Juni 2016). h.114

Intan, Andi Cahyani, “Poligami dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam”. Jurnal Al-Qadau Volume 5 No.2 (Desember, 2018). h.272.

Marfu’ah, Nurul Ainun, dkk. “Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Menentukan Besaran Bagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkara Perceraian (Studi Putusan Nomor 139/Pdt.G/2017/PA Takalar 1B)”. Qadauna Volume 2 Nomor 1 (Desember 2020). h.28.

Musfirah dan Istiqamah. “Analisis Pelaksanaan Isbat Nikah Terhadap Pernikahan Sirri di Pengadilan Agama Bantaeng”. Qadauna Volume 2 Edisi Khusus (Oktober, 2021). h. 806.

Rachyanti, Nahda Alya dan Muh. Saleh Ridwan. “Penghapusan Larangan Pernikahan Satu Kantor”. Qadauna Volume 2 No. 1 (Desember, 2020). h.146.

Ramlah dan Musyfika Ilyas. “Praktik Poligami Di Kecamatan Campalagian Kabupaten Polewali Mandar”. Qadauna Volume 1 No. 1 (Desember 2019). h.64.

Sabir, Muhammad. “Pernikahan Via Telepon”. Jurnal Al-Qadau Volume 2 No.2 (2015). h.198.

Talli , Abdul Halim. “Mediasai dalam PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2008”. Jurnal Al-Qadau Volume 2 No. 1 (2015). h.78.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan

Mahkamah Agung RI Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Bab XII, Tentang Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan.

Wawancara

Muh Arief Ridha, Hakim Pengadilan Agama Maros, Wawancara, Maros, 6 April 2022.

Published
2023-08-22
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 51 times