Persuasive Strategies Used by the Coaches in the Blind Audition of The Voice USA 2018
Abstrak
Artikel ini membahas strategi persuasi yang digunakan oleh para pelatih dalam audisi buta The Voice USA 2018. Objek penelitian ini adalah ucapan-ucapan dari empat pelatih The Voice USA 2018, yaitu Adam Levine, Alicia Keys, Kelly Clarkson, dan Blake Shelton. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi jenis strategi persuasi dan menganalisis cara strategi persuasi tersebut diungkapkan oleh para pelatih dalam audisi buta The Voice USA 2018.
Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah video dan transkrip. Peneliti mengambil dua belas video audisi buta The Voice USA 2018 yang memiliki lebih dari tiga juta penonton di YouTube sebagai sumber data. Peneliti mengambil data dari akun YouTube resmi The Voice. Dalam mengumpulkan data, peneliti menonton semua dua belas video audisi buta The Voice USA 2018 dari akun YouTube resmi The Voice dan menyalin video tersebut. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri sebagai instrumen untuk mendapatkan data.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keempat pelatih dalam audisi buta The Voice USA 2018 menggunakan tiga strategi persuasi, yaitu logos, ethos, dan pathos. Cara para pelatih menggunakan ketiga strategi tersebut berbeda-beda. Saat menggunakan logos, para pelatih membujuk para kontestan dengan menyatakan alasan logis, fakta tertentu, dan kebenaran sebagai bukti pendukung. Saat mereka menggunakan ethos, mereka menunjukkan reputasi, kredibilitas, citra, karakter, dan rekam jejak sebelumnya untuk mendapatkan lebih banyak kepercayaan dari para kontestan. Kemudian, saat mereka menggunakan pathos, mereka menggunakan daya tarik emosional untuk mengendalikan emosi para kontestan.
Kata Kunci: Logos, Pathos, Ethos, Audisi
Referensi
Aditama, M. G. (2016). Persuasion in International Journals: Pragmatic Analysis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Argyropoulou, V., & Ypsilantis, G. S. (2017). Persuasive Strategies in Argumentative/Persuasive Discourse Written in Italian by Greek Second Language Learners. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the English Department of the University of Bucharest, Romania. http://ikee. lib. auth. gr/record/289014/files/GRI-2017-19167. pdf (15.9. 2019).
Aristotle. (1967). The Art of Rhetoric (J. H. Fressy & W. Heinemann, Trans.). London: Ltd. London.
Bettinghaus, E. P., & Cody, M. J. (1994). Persuasive communication: New York, US: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1987.
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives: Univ of California Press.
Cline, A. R. (2002). Understand and Act: Classical Rhetoric, Speech Acts, and the Teaching of Critical Democratic Participation. Department of English and Department of Political Science. University of ….
Cockcroft, R. (2004). Putting Aristotle to the proof: Style, substance and the EPL group. Language and Literature, 13(3), 195-215.
Diamond, G. A., & Cobb, M. D. (1996). The candidate as a catastrophe: Latitude theory and the problems of political persuasion. Political persuasion and attitude change, 225-247.
Hardin, K. (2001). Pragmatics of persuasive discourse in Spanish television advertising. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 56(2), 288-291.
Huckabee, S. (2018). Ethos, Logos, Pathos. Retrieved 10th July 2019, from https://huckabeeclassroom.com/ethos-logos-pathos.html
Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain: Longmans.
Mukarromah, N. (2016). Persuasive strategies used in slogan of IPhone advertisements. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Nothstine, W. (1989). Influencing others a handbook of persuasive strategies: Crisp Learning.
Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century: Routledge.
Poggi, I. (2005). The goals of persuasion. Pragmatics & Cognition, 13(2), 297-335.
Rank, H. (1988). Persuasion Analysis: A Companion to Composition: ERIC.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).