How to be Happy? A Comparative Study between Stoicism and Al Kindi's Ethical Frameworks

Main Article Content

Shely Cathrin
Reno Wikandaru
Nizla Rohaya

Abstract

This research examines and compares the perspectives of Stoicism and Al-Kindi on the concept of happiness. The investigation is warranted by the growing societal struggle with discontent, exacerbated by modern challenges such as rising mental health issues and weakened social bonds. While Stoicism has resurged as a popular framework for addressing these struggles, it has notable limitations—chiefly its neglect of the social and spiritual dimensions essential to holistic well-being. In contrast, Al-Kindi's ethical framework offers a compelling alternative, integrating intellectual, social, and spiritual elements into the pursuit of happiness. This research is a qualitative, comparative study within the field of philosophy, employing literature review and specific methodological components for analysis. The findings reveal that while Stoicism and Al-Kindi’s perspectives on happiness are distinct, they share core principles. Both reject material indulgence as the basis for happiness, emphasizing self-improvement through reason and morality. Stoicism defines happiness as a state of inner tranquility, achieved through mental discipline, self-regulation, and acceptance of fate. Al-Kindi, however, presents a more comprehensive view, framing happiness as an interplay of intellectual, moral, social, and spiritual dimensions.


الملخص


الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو دراسة ومقارنة وجهات نظر الرواقيين والكنديين حول السعادة. إن هذه القضية مهمة للفحص بسبب انتشار ظاهرة عدم الرضا الإنساني، والتي زادت في ظل التعقيدات الحديثة مثل مشاكل الصحة العقلية وضعف الروابط الاجتماعية. إن الفلسفة الرواقية، على الرغم من شعبيتها باعتبارها وجهة نظر للتغلب على عدم الرضا البشري، لها مع ذلك حدود صارخة - وخاصة إهمالها للأبعاد الاجتماعية والروحية. وقد برز الإطار الأخلاقي للكندي كبديل يدمج الأبعاد الفكرية والاجتماعية والروحية. هذا البحث بحث نوعي في مجال الفلسفة من نوع البحث المقارن. تم جمع البيانات في هذه الدراسة من خلال الدراسات الأدبية، وتم تحليلها باستخدام العناصر المنهجية في شكل الوصف، وتحليل اللغة، والتفسير، والترابط. وتظهر نتائج هذه الدراسة أن الرواقية والكندي لديهما وجهات نظر غنية ولكن مختلفة حول السعادة، مع بعض أوجه التشابه. يتفق كلاهما على أن السعادة لا تعتمد على الملذات المادية، بل على تطوير الذات من خلال العقل والفضيلة. يتم تعريف السعادة في وجهة النظر الرواقية على أنها حالة من الهدوء العقلي (الطمأنينة)، والتي يتم تحقيقها من خلال التمرين العقلي، وضبط النفس، وقبول المصير. أما الكندي فلديه رؤية أكثر تعددية الأبعاد. السعادة عند الكندي تشمل الأبعاد الفكرية والأخلاقية والاجتماعية والروحية. المعرفة هي المصدر الرئيسي للسعادة، لأنه من خلال المعرفة يستطيع الإنسان فهم الحقيقة والتقرب من الله.


Abstrak


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan membandingkan perspektif Stoikisme dan Al Kindi tentang kebahagiaan. Persoalan ini penting untuk diteliti karena meluasnya fenomena ketidakpuasan manusia, yang telah meningkat di tengah kompleksitas modern seperti masalah kesehatan mental dan melemahnya ikatan sosial. Stoikisme, meskipun populer sebagai pandangan untuk mengatasi ketidakpuasan manusia, namun demikian memiliki keterbatasan yang mencolok—terutama pengabaiannya terhadap dimensi sosial dan spiritual. Kerangka etika Al-Kindi muncul sebagai alternatif, yang mengintegrasikan dimensi intelektual, sosial, dan spiritual. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif bidang filsafat dengan jenis penelitian komparatif. Data pada penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka, dan dianalisis menggunakan unsur metodis berupa deskripsi, analitika bahasa, interpretasi, dan koherensi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Stoisisme dan Al-Kindi memiliki pandangan yang kaya namun berbeda tentang kebahagiaan, dengan beberapa kesamaan. Keduanya sepakat bahwa kebahagiaan tidak tergantung pada kenikmatan material, melainkan pada pengembangan diri melalui rasio dan kebajikan. Kebahagiaan dalam pandangan Stoisisme didefinisikan sebagai keadaan jiwa yang tenang (ataraxia), yang dicapai melalui latihan mental, kendali diri, dan penerimaan terhadap takdir. Al-Kindi memiliki pandangan yang lebih multidimensional. Kebahagiaan menurut Al Kindi mencakup dimensi intelektual, moral, sosial, dan spiritual. Pengetahuan menjadi sumber utama kebahagiaan, karena melalui pengetahuan manusia dapat memahami kebenaran dan mendekatkan diri kepada Tuhan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cathrin, S., Wikandaru, R., & Rohaya, N. (2025). How to be Happy? A Comparative Study between Stoicism and Al Kindi’s Ethical Frameworks. Jurnal Adabiyah, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/jad.v25i1a1
Section
Artikel

References

“A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy.” Choice Reviews Online 46, no. 09 (May 1, 2009): 46-4954. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.46-4954.
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Zhuldyz Imanbayeva, Asset Kuranbek, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Aiymzhan Ryskiyeva, and Egyptian University of Islamic Culture Nur-Mubarak. “The Doctrine of The Soul of Al-Kindi.” Al-Farabi 81, no. 1 (March 15, 2023): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.48010/2023.1/1999-5911.03.
Angraini, Dwi Ayu. “Harmonization or Harmony, Al-Kindi, Philosophy, and Religion.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy 2, no. 1 (June 27, 2023): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15642/jitp.2023.2.1.1-19.
Annas, Julia. “Ethics in Stoic Philosophy.” Phronesis 52, no. 1 (2007): 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852807X177968.
Auliati, Auliati, and Radea Yuli Hambali. “Filsafat Kebahagiaan Menurut Al-Kindi dan Al-Farabi.” Jurnal Riset Agama 3, no. 3 (December 27, 2023): 411–27. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v3i3.20383.
Becker, Lawrence C. “Stoic Virtue.” 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199385195.013.6.
Cahn, Steven M., and Peter Markie. Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Dopierała, Renata. “Popular Stoicism in the Face of Social Uncertainty.” Qualitative Sociology Review 18, no. 4 (October 31, 2022): 154–70. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.4.08.
Erva Zabryna, Farrah Ananta. “The Relevance of Stoicism Philosophy to the Social and Religious Life of Generation Z.” Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v10i1.320.
Frawley, Ashley. “‘Unhappy News’: Process, Rhetoric, and Context in the Making of the Happiness Problem.” Sociological Research Online 23, no. 1 (March 2018): 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417744791.
George Sarton. “Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Science (Preliminary Note).” Isis 4, no. 1 (1921): 23–31.
Irwin, Terence. “Stoicism: Virtue and Happiness.” 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198242673.003.0013.
Isfaroh, Isfaroh. “Konsep Kebahagiaan Al-Kindi.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Theology and Philosophy 1, no. 1 (June 30, 2019): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijitp.v1i1.4095.
Kaelan. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Paradigma, 2005.
Karimullah, Suud Sarim. “Reflections on Human-Nature Relations: A Critical Review in Islamic Humanities.” Jurnal Adabiyah 23, no. 2 (November 15, 2023): 189–206. https://doi.org/10.24252/jad.v23i2a5.
Karl, Johannes Alfons, Paul Verhaeghen, Shelley N. Aikman, Stian Solem, Espen R. Lassen, and Ronald Fischer. “Misunderstood Stoicism: The Negative Association Between Stoic Ideology and Well-Being.” Journal of Happiness Studies 23, no. 7 (October 2022): 3531–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00563-w.
Kenny, Anthony. A New History of Western Philosophy. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
Ma’arip, Muhammad Samsul, and Radea Yuli Ahmad Hambali. “Filsafat Stoicism dan Relevansinya dengan Kebahagiaan Manusia: Studi Kebahagiaan Konsumtif dalam Dunia Digital Metaverse.” Jurnal Riset Agama 3, no. 2 (August 25, 2023): 344–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v3i2.20551.
Manson, Mark. The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life.* 2nd ed. New York: Harper, 2016.
Kompas Cyber Media. “Angka Bunuh Diri di DIY Capai 52 Kasus hingga Oktober 2024, Apa Penyebabnya? Halaman all.” KOMPAS.com, October 10, 2024. https://yogyakarta.kompas.com/read/2024/10/10/175827278/angka-bunuh-diri-di-diy-capai-52-kasus-hingga-oktober-2024-apa.
Muhammad Rosul. “Thoughts of Muslim Scientists Al-Kindi and Ibn Sina.” Maklumat: Journal of Da’wah and Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (December 14, 2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.61166/maklumat.v1i1.1.
Satriawan, Andrean, Ris’an Rusli, and Rahmat Hidayat. “Stoicism and Fear of Missing Out (Fomo) in The Z Generation’s Trend.” International Journal of Social Service and Research 3, no. 10 (September 25, 2023): 2348–60. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i10.552.
Sellars, John. Stoicism, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/upo9781844653720.
Setyariza, Nur Ayu, Intan Kusumawardani, Sri Erna Widayati, Yekti Handayani, and Kasori Kasori. “Analisis Konsep Kebahagiaan dalam Pandangan Filsafat Islam.” TSAQOFAH 4, no. 1 (January 22, 2024): 895–912. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i1.2628.
Stefaniuk, Tomasz. “Man in Early Islamic Philosophy - Al-Kindi and Al-Farabi.” Ruch Filozoficzny 78, no. 3 (December 5, 2022): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2022.023.
Texas A&M University, and Maximillian Kutch. “The Relevance of Modern Stoicism.” Journal of Wellness, 2020. https://doi.org/10.18297/jwellness/vol3/iss1/5.
Tribunnews.com. “Cerita Surti, Warga Jaksel Korban Judi Online: Kaget Didatangi Debt Collector Tagih Utang Suami,” November 24, 2024. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2024/11/23/cerita-surti-warga-jaksel-korban-judi-online-kaget-didatangi-debt-collector-tagih-utang-suami.
Umar, Umar, and Indo Santalia. “Pemikiran Al-Kindi: Dalam Sebuah Kajian Filsafat.” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research 2, no. 1 (June 24, 2022): 760–64. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v2i1.4881.
Zevnik, Luka. “Towards a New Perspective in Cultural Studies: Emotional and Spiritual Problems and Happiness in Contemporary Western Societies.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 13, no. 4 (July 2010): 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877910369977.
Zubair, Achmad Charris. Kuliah Etika. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1987.