ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW ON JARIMAH ZINA'S TESTIMONY: UNCOVERING THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SHARIA DOCTRINE AND REALITY
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the orientalist N.J. Coulson's point of view on the discrepancy between the doctrine of Sharia and reality in the case of adultery in the evidence of a witness. This research was qualitative in nature and employed a descriptive normative juridical technique to answer the research questions. Documenting data, conducting data analysis through reduction, presenting data and drawing conclusions were all examples of data collection techniques. With regard to the testimony of adultery, the researcher aimed to uncover and then offer evidence regarding the disagreement between Sharia doctrine and reality in order to better understand the phenomenon. Based on the findings of the study, it could be stated that Islamic Sharia is a Sharia that places a great value on human honor, and that hifz al-irdh was one of the maqashid sharia, or honor code. With the introduction of hifz al-'irdh, the Islamic Criminal Law had strengthened the requirement for four witnesses to testify in an adultery case. This was also consistent with the punishment for adultery, which might range from stoning to death. However, the criticism levelled against N.J. Coulson regarding the seeming conflict between Sharia doctrine and reality in terms of the strictness of testimony was essentially incorrect, as Islamic law granted the privilege of maintaining human honor (hifz al-'irdh) rather than a conflict.
References
Agatha, Georgina, Liza Priandhini, And Yeni Salma Barlinti. “Pembuktian Dan Pengesahan Anak Luar Kawin Serta Akibat Hukumnya Setelah Berlaku Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam.” Indonesian Notary 3, No. 1 (2021).
Anisah, Siti. “Penerapan Hukum Qishash Untuk Menegakkan Keadilan.” Journal Of Islamic Law Studies 1, No. 2 (2018): 98–109.
Basettu, Baharuddin. “Konflik Dan Ketenangan Dalam Hukum Islam Antara Idealisme Dan Realisme.” Al-Bayyinah 1, No. 2 (2017): 29–42.
Coulson, Noel James. A History Of Islamic Law. Routledge, 2017.
Coulson, Noel James, And H Fuad. Konflik Dalam Yurisprudensi Islam. Navila, 2001.
Daud, Fathonah K. “Parafilia: Nature Atau Nurture? Tinjauan Teologis Dan Psikologis.” Al-A’raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Filsafat 13, No. 2 (2016): 283–311.
Elsiddig, Abdel Azim M. “An Examination Of The Problems Of Islamization Of Laws: Issues In Contemporary Islamic Legal Theory.” Temple University, 1993.
Fakhyadi, Defel. “Patriarkisme Hukum Kewarisan Islam: Kritik Hukum Waris Islam Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Hukum Islam 21, No. 1 (2021): 1–16.
Fanani, Akhwan. “Perspektif Coulson Terhadap Rumusan Dialektika Hukum Islam.” Al-Ahkam 22, No. 2 (2012): 121–38.
Haq, Islamu. “Pengaruh Perbedaan Keterangan Saksi Jarimah Zina (Perpektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam).” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 5, No. 1 (2020): 1–14.
Haq, Islamul, M Ali Rusdi Bedong, Abdul Syatar, And Muhammad Majdy. “Paraphilia Exhibitionism Between Sharia And Law: A Comparative Analysis,” 2020.
Harahap, M Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP. Sinar Grafika, 2000.
Hermansyah, Hermansyah. “Konflik Dalam Yurisprudensi Islam.” Mu’amalat: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 10, No. 1 (2018): 1.
Huda, Miftachul, Ajat Sudrajat, Razaleigh Muhamat, Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh, And Burhanuddin Jalal. “Strengthening Divine Values For Self-Regulation In Religiosity: Insights From Tawakkul (Trust In God).” International Journal Of Ethics And Systems, 2019.
Huda, Syamsul. “Zina Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana.” HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika 12, No. 2 (2015): 377–97.
Mccloud, Aminah Beverly, And Irshad Abdal-Haqq. Understanding Islamic Law: From Classical To Contemporary. Rowman Altamira, 2006.
Naro, Wahyuddin, Abdul Syatar, Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin, Islamul Haq, Achmad Abubakar, And Chaerul Risal. “Shariah Assessment Toward The Prosecution Of Cybercrime In Indonesia.” International Journal Of Criminology And Sociology 9 (2020): 572–86. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.5.
Samin, Sabri. “Menelusuri Akar Sistem Pengawasan Penegak Hukum.” Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 3, No. 1 (2014): 16–23.
Sari, Devi Nilam. “Implementasi Hukuman Qisas Sebagai Tujuan Hukum Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Muslim Heritage 5, No. 2 (2020): 286.
SEGAF, QURAISY, M Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqi, And Maryani Maryani. “Sanksi Pidana Adat Tentang Zina Dalam Persepektif Hukum Islam Kecamatan Pelayangan Seberang Kota Jambi.” UIN Sulthan Thaha Saipuddin Jambi, 2019.
Siregar, Muhammad Habibi. Otoritarianisme Hukum Islam; Kritik Atas Hierarki Teks Al-Kutub As-Sittah. Vol. 1. LKIS PELANGI AKSARA, 2014.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 1997.
Supardin, And Abdul Syatar. “Adultery Criminalization Spirit In Islamic Criminal Law: Alternatives In Indonesia’s Positive Legal System Reform.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, No. 2 (2021): 913–27. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.22373/Sjhk.V5i2.9353.
Syarifah, Syarifah. “Zina Act Review From Islamic Law In Bandar Sinembah Village Tanjung Morawa.” International Journal Of Ethno-Sciences And Education Research 1, No. 4 (2021): 71–75.
Tomkins, Cyril. “The Shari’ah And Its Implications For Islamic Financial Analysis: An Opportunity To Study Interactions Among Society, Organization, And Accounting.” American Journal Of Islam And Society 4, No. 1 (1987): 101–15.
Ulya, Zaki. “Dinamika Penerapan Hukum Jinayat Sebagai Wujud Rekonstruksi Syari’at Islam Di Aceh.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 5, No. 1 (2016): 135–48.
Warburg, Gabriel. “The Sudan, Egypt And Britain, 1899–1916.” Middle Eastern Studies 6, No. 2 (1970): 163–78.
Yasa’Abubakar, Al, And Iqbal Maulana. “Alat Bukti Dan Metode Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Zina.” LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 173–89.
Zunaidi, Arif. “Abu Yusuf Dan Pajak (Konsep Dalam Kitab Al-Kharaj Dan Relevansinya Dalam Ekonomi Saat Ini).” Fenomena 20, no. 1 (2021): 61–76.
Copyright (c) 2022 Islamul Haq, Marilang, Kurniati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.