CRIMINALIZATION OF UNLAWFUL ACTS DOES NOT DETERMINE THE STATUS OF NARCOTIC CONFISCATED GOODS AND NARCOTIC PRECURSORS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVING CASES

Yandres Junius Amalo; Syamsuddin  Muchtar

doi:10.24252/al-risalah.vi.39874

Yandres Junius Amalo Kejaksaan Negeri Lebong
(ID)
Syamsuddin Muchtar Universitas Hasanuddin
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.39874

Keywords: Prosecutor's Authority, Sanctions, Criminalization

Abstract

One of the areas of law in carrying out the duties of the Prosecutor's Office according to Article 30 paragraph (1) letter b of the Prosecutor's Law states that the prosecutor's office carries out prosecutions and executors of court decisions that have permanent legal force related to the crime of Narcotics Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics (abbreviated Narcotics Law). In this regard, Article 141 of Law number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics states that the Head of the District Attorney who unlawfully does not implement the provisions referred to in Article 91 paragraph (1) may be punished. Determination of Sanctions in a criminal law is not merely a matter of mere technical legislation, but is an integral part of the substance or material of the law itself. So that the imposition of sanctions is not necessarily enforced based on the sound of the article but must pay attention to other aspects contained in the regulation, in this case must pay attention to the principles of applicable law. This research is normative legal research by combining conceptual approaches, statutory approaches and case approaches. The results of the research show that the issues of penalization, depenalization, criminalization and decriminalization must be understood comprehensively with all aspects of issues of substance or statutory material at the stage of legislation policy. Based on this concept, care must be taken so that criminalization remains in the correct corridor, namely paying attention to the principles of criminalization (the principle of legality, the principle of subsidiarity, and the principle of equality/equality).

References

(Ed.), J.E. Sahetapy. Criminal Law. Yogyakarta: Libeety, 1999.

Ardiansyah, Emir. “Konstitusionalitas Tentang Ancaman Bagi Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri Atas Sitaan Narkotika.” Simbur Cahaya 28, no. 2 (2021): 295–311. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v28i2.1127.

Ardiansyah, Emir, Ulya Kencana, dan S A Romli. “Konstitusionalitas Ancaman Pidana Terhadap Kejari (Penetapan Status Barang Sitaan dan Prekursor Narkotika).” Wajah Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 481–94. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v5i2.540.

Ariyanti, Vivi. “Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Yuridis 6, no. 2 (2019): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i2.789.

Black, Hendry Campbell. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition. USA: St Paul Minn, West Publishing Co, 1979.

Daulay, Arifin. “Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 Tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Lingkungan Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 4 (2022): 6677–87. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i4.4228.

Fatmawati, Ika Lusiana. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Obstruction of Justice Dilihat Dari Perspektif Hukum di Indonesia.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2023.

Fatoni, Syamsul. “Penghapusan Kriminalisasi terhadap Hakim dan Jaksa dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Sinkronisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 224–42. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk17110.

Hamzah, Andi. Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Sinar Graphic Publisher, 2004.

Harahap, M Dedy Iskandar, M Yamin Lubis, dan Nelvitia Purba. “Peran Intelijen Kejaksaan dalam Mengungkap Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA 3, no. 3 SE- (29 Oktober 2021): 1122–46. https://ejournal.steitholabulilmi.ac.id/index.php/metadata/article/view/102.

Hasibuan, Edi Saputra, dan M H SH. Hukum kepolisian dan criminal policy dalam penegakan hukum. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Hendarta, Hendarta, Muhammad Said Karim, dan Nur Azisa. “Penanganan Barang Bukti Narkotika Di Pengadilan Negeri Barru.” HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 301–9. https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v5i2.5698.

Kenedi, John. Buku Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Krisna, Liza Agnesta. Hukum Perlindungan Anak: Panduan Memahami Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.

Lubis, Andi Hakim, Junaidi Lubis, dan Said Rizal. “Optimalisasi Pengawasan dan Pembinaan Hakim Menuju Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Berintegritas dan Bermartabat.” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 5, no. 1 (2022): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v5i1.2456.

Manumpahi, Romy Boby. “Pengembalian Barang Bukti dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Kuhap.” LEX CRIMEN 10, no. 5 (2021). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33438/31641.

Moechthar, Oemar. Eksistensi, Fungsi, Dan Tujuan Hukum: Dalam Perspektif Teori Dan Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2020.

Muaja, Stefano Junio. “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Penyidik Dalam Penanganan Perkara Narkotika.” Lex Crimen 2, no. 6 (2012): 5–17. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/3124/2668.

Najih, Muhammad. Politics of Criminal Law. Malang: Setara Press, 2014.

Negara, Tri Wahyu Kusuma. “Peranan Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) 5, no. 1 (2018): 309–14.

Novyanti, Heny, dan Pudji Astuti. “Jerat Hukum Penyalahgunaan Aplikasi Deepfake Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 2021, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.43571.

Poerwadarminta, WJS. Indonesian General Dictionary. Jakarta, 1976.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Criminalization in Criminal Law. Bandung: Nusa Media Publishe, 2010.

Putra, Muhammad Amin. “Eksistensi Lembaga Negara dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia.” FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 3 (2015): 256–92. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no3.600.

Safri, Sofyan. Management Control System (Management Control System). Jakarta: Quantum Library, 2004.

Saleh, Roesian. Policies on Criminalization and Decriminalization: What Legal Sociology Talks About in Reforming Indonesian Criminal Law. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Law UII, 1993.

Saleh, Roeslan. Principles of Criminal Law in Perspective. Jakarta: New Script, 1981.

Sengi, Ernest. “Upaya Kepolisian Resor Halmahera Utara dalam Menanggulangi Kejahatan Narkotika Kabupaten Halmahera Utara.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 61–76. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p61-76.

Sholehuddin. Sanctions System in Criminal Law, First Publication. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo, 2003.

Siahaan, R.O. Criminal Law I. Cibubur: RAO Press, 2009.

Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 2 (2020): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460.

Soesilo, R. The Criminal Code (KUHP) and its Comments Complete. Bogor: Politeia Publisher, 1996.

Sunarso, H Siswanto. Viktimologi dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Supriadi. Ethics & Responsibilities of the Legal Profession in Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Graphic, 2006.

Syam, Ismail, Alpi Sahari, dan Rizkan Zulyadi. “Analisis Hukum Pertimbangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Untuk Menentukan Berat Ringannya Tuntutan Terhadap Terdakwa dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Di Kejaksaan Bener Meriah).” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 4, no. 2 (2023): 100–111. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v4i2.364.

Topo Santoso, S H, Choky Risda Ramadhan, dan L L M SH. Prapenuntutan dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. De: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers, 2022.

Waskito, Achmad Budi. “Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 287–304. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2648.

Zaidan, M Ali. Menuju pembaruan hukum pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.