JUDGE'S EX OFFICIO RIGHTS TO A FAIR VERSTEK DIVORCE DECISION AT THE PALOPO RELIGIOUS COURT

Suleha Nurazisah Pasinian; Muammar Arafat Yusmad; Abdain; A. Sukmawati  Assaad; Takdir

doi:10.24252/al-risalah.vi.43697

Suleha Nurazisah Pasinian Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
(ID)
Muammar Arafat Yusmad Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
(ID)
Abdain Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
(ID)
A. Sukmawati Assaad Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
(ID)
Takdir Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.43697

Kata Kunci: Ex Officio Judge, Vestek Divorce, Justice, Palopo Religious Court

Abstrak

Judges have the authority to hear and decide divorce cases, which are delegated to them in Court autonomously and without influence from outside parties in accordance with applicable regulations. This research aimed to reveal the use of the Judge's ex officio rights regarding fair divorce decisions at the Palopo Religious Court. This research was empirical, using a normative and juridical approach. The data collection techniques used interviews, observation, and documentation. The data analysis technique was carried out in three steps, namely reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research results showed that the use of ex officio rights by the Judge of Palopo Religious Court regarding the verstek decision in a fair talaq divorce case was the determination of a decision outside the appellant’s petitum by the Judge by determining the level of living for the ex-wife due to the woman's lack of awareness to demand her rights after the divorce as evidenced by her absence at the trial, which is based on limitations. The execution of the Palopo Religious Court regarding the provision of mut'ah and iddah living in Decision number 25/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Plp was on consignment. The perspective of Islamic law regarding women's rights after divorce in decision number 25/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Plp and decision number 7/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Plp at the Palopo Religious Court was the provision of iddah, mut’ah, madhiyah, hadhanah and dowry owed to the ex-wife, according to the limitations.

Referensi

Akmal, Andi Muhammad, and Mulham Jaki Asti. “Problematika Nikah Siri, Nikah Online Dan Talak Siri Serta Implikasi Hukumnya Dalam Fikih Nikah.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 21, no. 1 (2021): 45–59.

Arafah, Muhammad, Irsan Nur, Sofyan, Mulham Jaki Asti, and Andi Muhammad Ridha Rahmatullah. “’Illat and Wisdom in Use Ultrasonography (USG) during Iddah Period.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 4, no. 1 (2023): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.vi.35405.

Arma, Hariri Ocviani. “Pembayaran Nafkah ‘Iddah Dan Mut’Ah Dalam Perkara Cerai Talak Di Pengadilan Agama.” Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7, no. 2 (2022): 156–69.

Hidayati, Nuzulia Febri. “Rekonstruksi Hukum ‘Iddah Dan Ihdad Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).” Mazahibuna, July 2019. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V1I1.9663.

Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI, 2019. https://lajnah.kemenag.go.id/unduhan/category/3-terjemah-al-qur-an-tahun-2019.

Khon, Abdul Majid. Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta: Amzah, 2012.

Marwing, Anita. “Perlindungan Hak-Hak Perempuan Pasca Perceraian (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palopo).” Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research 1, no. 1 (2018): 45–62.

Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Rasjidi, Lili. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Dan Teori Hukum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2004.

Saputra, Dian Saputra, Jamaluddin Jamaluddin, and Yulia Yulia. “Perlindungan Hak Perempuan Dan Anak Dalam Putusan Verstek Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah IDI.” Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 9, no. 2 (2021): 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v9i2.4799.

Saraswati, Rika, Venatius Hadiyono, Yuni Kusniati, Yuvita Kusuma Maharani, Eunikhe Karina Priyono, and Nanda Gretta Nababan. “Pelaksanaan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum (Studi Kasus Perkara No. Pol: Bp/01/I/2020/Reskrim Di Pengadilan Negeri Purwodadi).” Fakultas Hukum dan Komunikasi, 2020.

Setiawan, Danie. “Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Kewajiban Suami Terhadap Isteri Dalam Perkara Cerai Talak.” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 7, no. 1 (2022): 45–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.7.1.45-53.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al – Mishbah (Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an). Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Simorangkir. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Taufiq, Nur. Fiqh Rumah Tangga. Depok: Elsas, 2012.

Wicaksono, Bayu A. “Hak Ex Officio Hakim Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Pengadilan Agama Kuala Pembuang, Diakses Pada 17 (2022).

Wijaya, Abdi, and Riska. “An Evaluation of Marriage Dowry Using Digital Money from the Perspective of the Four Madhhabs.” PAREWA SARAQ : Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 48–58. https://ejournal.sulselmui.com/index.php/PS/article/view/5.