HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN READING CONCEPT MAP COOPERATIVE SCRIPT (REMAP-CS) DAN READING CONCEPT MAP TIMED PAIR SHARE (REMAP-TMPS)

  • Idawati Mansyur Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Ainul Uyuni Taufiq Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Safei Safei Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)

Abstract

This study determined the comparison of student learning outcomes between the application of the Reading Concept Map Cooperative Script (ReMap-CS) learning model and the Reading Concept Map Timed Pair Share (ReMap-TmPS). This type of study was quasi-experimental using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. The research population is all students of class XI IPA SMAN 2 Gowa as many as 323 students. The research sample consisted of 24 students of class XI IPA 6 and 24 students of class XI IPA 7 selected by the purposive sampling technique. The learning outcomes research instruments were learning outcomes tests in the form of questions and assignments regarding the excretory system material used to measure student competency achievement. The data analysis technique used was descriptive data analysis and inferential data analysis. The results showed that the average student learning outcomes using the ReMap-CS learning model were 83,33 while the ReMap-TmPS learning model was 78,33. The t-test results show that the sig (2-tailed) value is 0,008. Results indicate that the sig. (2-tailed) value <0.05, which means a significant difference between learning outcomes in both the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2, where experimental class 1 using Remap-CS is better than experiment 2 using ReMap-TmPs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, M. (2009). Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bahri, A., Adnan, & Ismail. (2018). Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Mahasiswa Dengan Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi, 872–877.

Hayati, N., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). Students’ reading interest in biology learning model based on remap CIRC, GI and TGT. Biosfer, 13(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.167-182

Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does Remap-STAD have the potential to promote students’ creative thinking skills? 030029. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043179

Isjoni. (2016). Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Jatmiko, A., Kartina, Y., Irwandani, I., Fakhri, J., Pricilia, A., & Rahayu, T. (2018). Reading Concept Map-Think Pair Share (Remap-TPS) Learning Model on Cognitive Ability and Scientific Attitude. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3184

Kartina, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reading- Concept Map-Think Pair Share (REMAP-TPS) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas Viii Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA. Skripsi. Lampung: Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.

Kurniawati, Z.L., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Metakognitif Dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Melalui Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Reading Concept Map-Cooperative Script (REMAP-CS). Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(4): 617-621

Mufida, R. H., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Biologi Reading-Concept-Map-Student Team Achievement Division pada Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X MIPA SMA. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 2, 539–547.

Pangestuti, A. A. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Remap-Stad Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Mahasiswa Ikip Budi Utomo Malang. Edubiotik, 2(1), 10.

Qudsyi, H., Indriaty, L., Herawaty, Y., Saifullah, -, Khaliq, I., & Setiawan, J. (2011). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif (Cooperative Learning) Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMA. Proyeksi, 6(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.30659/p.6.2.34-49.

Rahim, F. (2012). Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Redja, M. (2004). Filsafat Ilmu Pendidikan: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rivai, A. T. O. (2019). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Peredaran Darah Menggunakan Media Macromedia Flash Dengan Charta. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies (IJES), 22(2), 153–161.

Rosyida, F., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S. (2016). Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa Dengan Pembelajaran Reading Concept Map-Timed Pair Share (Remap-TmPS). Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(4): 622-627.

Sadulloh, U. (2011). Pedagogik Ilmu Mendidik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Saleh, H. I., Danial, M., & Junda, D. M. (2017). Hubungan antara Gaya Mengajar Guru dan Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik dengan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Peserta Didik SMA di Kota Bulukumba. UNM Journal of Biological Education, 1(1), 80–88.

Setiawan, D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). Minat baca dan keterampilan metakognitif pada pembelajaran biologi melalui model pembelajaran remap think pair share. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 5(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.651

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumatri, M. S. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.

Syamsudduha, S. (2014). Penelitian Berbasis Kelas Konsep dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: CV Arti Bumi Intara.

Tendrita, M., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Reading-Concept-Map Think Pair Share (Remap Tps) Dapat Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar KognitiF. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(6), 763–767.

Tesashogi, N. N. T., Sri Mertasari, N. M., & Pujawan, I. G. N. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reading Concept Map Cooperative Script Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha, 10(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpm.v10i2.19928

Published
2021-04-30
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 173 times