Kekuatan Keterangan Saksi Verbalisan Ditinjau Dari Segi Pembuktian
Abstract
This study aims to determine how the position of verbalized witnesses in the Criminal Procedure Code, and also to find out what factors caused verbalized witnesses to be presented in the trial process and to find out how the strength of evidence against verbalized witness statements was carried out in the Makassar District Court, using research methods qualitative field method by going directly to the field by conducting interviews with judges, besides that the author also takes a theoretical basis by studying books, scientific works, articles and laws and regulations relating to the title of the thesis and the problem of the object of research. The results of the research obtained are: 1) The position of verbal witnesses is not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code but regarding the meaning of verbal witnesses, namely the judge takes the legal basis from the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 65/PUU-VIII/2010. As the legal basis for verbal witnesses. 2) Factors that cause verbal witnesses to be presented in the trial process because the defendant or witness denies his actions or does not admit the mistakes contained in the Investigation Report. (BAP).
References
Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum, (Jakarta: PT Ghalia Indonesia 2008), h. 11.
Djoko Prakoso, Alat Bukti Dan Kekutan Pembuktian Didalam Peroses Pidana, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988), h. 49.
Hari Sasangka, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003), h. 10.
Fuady, M. I. N. (2021). PEREMPUAN: Perempuan dan Media.
Fuady, M. I. N., Arbani, T. S., Ishak, N., Yaasiin, M., & Raya, A. D. B. (2021). The Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Expression and Its Limits in the Indonesian Constitution.
Nurlaelah, N. (2020). Semantic Patterns of Disagreements in English.
Nurlaelah, N., Syahid, A., Fuady, M. I. N., & Lestari, M. F. (2021). Improving Learning Activities and Outcomes of Students by Application of Observation-based Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 479-486.
Nur Fuady, M. I. (2020). Moderasi Beragama Pada Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Memberantas Kriminalitas Geng Motor.
Radjab, S., & Fuady, M. I. N. (2021). The Indonesian Government's Inconsistency in Handling The Covid-19 Pandemic. Yuridika, 36(3), 745-758.
Sharfina, N. H., Paserangi, H., Rasyid, F. P., & Fuady, M. I. N. (2021, October). Copyright Issues on the Prank Video on the Youtube. In International Conference on Environmental and Energy Policy (ICEEP 2021) (pp. 90-97).
Lili Rosita, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003), h. 10-11.
M. Yahya Harahap, PEMBAHASAN PERMASALAHAN DAN PENERAPAN KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. (Cet. XIV; Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2015), h. 273.
M. Yahya Harahap, PEMBAHASAN PERMASALAHAN DAN PENERAPAN KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, (Cet.XIV; Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012), h. 101-102.
Nikolas Simanjuntak, Acara Pidana Indonesia Dalam Sirkus Hukum, (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2009), h. 263.
Burhanuddin, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Makassar, (Wawancara, Tanggal 21 Juli 2020).
Agus Darwis, Hak Menolak Memberikan Keterangan Atau Mencabut BAP https://www.google.com/amp/s/tengeaku.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/hak-menolak-memberikan-keterangan-atau-mencabut-bap. (Diakses Tanggal 16 Juli 2020, Pukul 14:46 WITA).
