Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Narkotika (Studi Kasus Kota Makassar)

  • Andi Rahmah Universitas Indonesia Timur
    (ID)
  • Amiruddin Pabbu Universitas Indonesia Timur
    (ID)

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the application of material criminal law in cases of narcotics possession crimes and to find out what the judges consider in making decisions against perpetrators of narcotics possession crimes. The research method used is normative legal research with a research approach that includes a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Technique Analysis of the data was analyzed qualitatively, then from the results of the analysis will be poured descriptively. The application of the Material Criminal Law by the Judge to the Crime of Possession of Narcotics Category I in the Decision on Case Number 669/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks has been correct. The Public Prosecutor used alternative charges, namely: Article 114 Paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Jo Article 132 (1) of the Law. RI. No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, or Article 112 Paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Among the elements of the two Articles charged by the Public Prosecutor. Where the actions and the elements of the Article match each other. The judge's legal consideration of the criminal act of Narcotics Ownership Category I is not a plant in imposing a sentence, it is appropriate because the Judge in case Number 669/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks imposed a sentence based on witness testimony, defendant's statement, and documentary evidence according to Article 184 KUHAP is legal evidence. Furthermore, the evidence supports the facts revealed in the trial which convinced the judge that the criminal act of Possession of Narcotics Category I was not a plant that actually occurred and that the defendant was guilty of committing it.

References

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Deliani, D. (2021). PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA PADA ANAK-ANAK. Juripol (Jurnal Institusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan), 4(2), 49-55.

NURLAELAH, MALOKO, M. T., FUADY, M. I. N., MULIYONO, A., & RAYA, M. Y. The Effect of the Investigative Report Learning Model on Student’s Perception of Anti-Corruption Behavior Development.

Nurlaelah. (2020). Aplikasi Model Quantum Teaching Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Capaian Pembelajaran Siswa. Jurnal Inspiratif Pendidikan, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 152-167.

Akbar, R., Rasyid, C. A., & Fuady, M. I. N. (2021). UNDANG-UNDANG MINERBA UNTUK KEPENTINGAN RAKYAT ATAU PEMERINTAH?. Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 15(2), 253-262.

Raya, M. Y., Aryani, M., Hidayat, T., & Fuady, M. I. N. (2021). Government Policy in Establishing Halal Certification Bodies is Based on SNI ISO/IEC 17065: 2012.

Hamsir, M. I. N. F. (2021). Relation of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Perpetrators in Indonesia: A Qualitative Analysis. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences.

Nurlaelah. (2018). Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Humanistik Pada Generasi Milenial. Proceedings The Third International Conference on Education and Regional Development (ICERD).

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana

Sudanto, A. (2017). Penerapan Hukum Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 8(1), 137-161.

Undang-undang Dasara Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-undang No. 35 tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika

Published
2022-08-03
Section
Volume 4 Nomor 2 Agustus 2022
Abstract viewed = 124 times