Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan yang Telah Diregistrasi oleh Notaris (Waarmerking) di Kabupaten Maros

  • Ibnu Izzah
    (ID)

Abstract

waarmarked in less than 5 years by 9 Notaries. This indicates that people in Maros Regency have a high interest in registering deeds under their hands at a Notary. Then what if the underhanded deed has been registered or recorded by a notary (waarmerking) who incidentally is an authorized public official, will it add to the strength of proof of the underhanded deed. This study aims to: (1) find out the practice and responsibilities of a notary in registering deed under the hands of a waarmerking (2) understand the strength of proof of an underhanded deed that has been registered by a notary in civil court proceedings. The research method used in this research is empirical legal research, namely research that prioritizes field research which aims to obtain primary data through interviews with several Notaries and Judges in Maros Regency. The data were then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Notaries are not legally responsible for the correctness of privately registered deeds (waarmerking) both from the truth of their identity, the contents of the deed, the date of manufacture and the signatures of the parties. So that the Notary cannot be prosecuted both civilly and criminally for untruths in the underhanded deed that has been waarmarked (2) The strength of proof of underhanded deed that has been waarmarked cannot be equated with an authentic deed. Instead, it remains a private deed, the perfection of which lies in the acknowledgment of the signature by the parties who sign the private deed.

References

Buku
R. Soegondo Notodisoerjo. (1993). Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia, Suatu Penjelasan. Raja
Grafindo Persada: Jakarta
A. Kohar. (1984). Notaris Berkomunikasi. Alumni: Bandung.
R. Subekti. (2001). Hukum Pembuktian, cet. 13. Pradnya Paramita: Jakarta
Bambang Sungguno. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo
Persada: Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. (1984). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan
Singkat. UI Press: Jakarta
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2019). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi revisi Cet. Ke-14. Kencana Prenada
Media Group: Jakarta.
Husein Usman. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty: Yogyakarta.
Bambang Waluyo. (1996). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan Indonesia. Sinar Grafika:
Jakarta.
Muhammad Adam. (1985). Asal Usul dan Sejarah Akta Notariat. CV. Sinar Baru: Bandung.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.
Teguh Samudra. (1992). Hukum pembuktian dalam hukum acara perdata. Alumni. Bandung.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Republik Indonesia
Wawancara
Wawancara dengan Notaris di Kabupaten Maros Muhammad Ilyas Rachman S.H.
G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Cet.3 (Jakarta: Erlangga, 1992), 289.
Wawancara dengan Muhammad Ilyas Rachman, S.H., Notaris di Maros tanggal 1 Agustus
2017
Wawancara dengan Ahmad Yulias, S.H., Notaris di Maros tanggal 1 Agustus 2017
Wawancara dengan Ristanti Rahim, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Maros 15 Agustus 2017
Wawancara dengan Divo Artianto, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Maros 16 Agustus 2017
Wawancara dengan Rubianti, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Maros 15 Agustus 2017
Wawancara dengan Ristanti Rahim, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Maros 15 Agustus 2017
Wawancra dengan Divo Artianto, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Maros 16 Agustus 2017
Wawancara dengan Rubianti, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Maros 15 Agustus 2017
Published
2023-01-02
Section
Volume 4 Nomor 3 November 2022
Abstract viewed = 84 times