The Use of Oath Evidence and Its Implementation (Study in Surakarta Religious Court)

Muhammad Kurniawan Budi  Wibowo; Aditya Fajri Kurnia Pradana

doi:10.24252/aldev.v6i2.46251

Muhammad Kurniawan Budi Wibowo The Islamic Institute Of Mamba'ul Ulum Surakarta
(ID)
Aditya Fajri Kurnia Pradana The Islamic Institute Of Mamba'ul Ulum Surakarta
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i2.46251

Keywords: Religious Courts, Oath Evidence, Islamic Law

Abstract

The evidence of the oath considering that the oath is directly related to God, then all the risks and consequences that arise will be felt alone to the reciter of the oath. What makes the most basic problem is that oath evidence is set at the end of various other evidence. The method of approach in this research is normative juridical, which is legal research conducted by examining library materials / secondary data as a basis for research by conducting a search for regulations related to the issues discussed. The results of research on oaths in Islamic law are the fulfilment of Allah's commandments that have a strong foundation. The oath by which one party binds the other party to the decision of a case, which is made orally in the presence of the opposing party and before the judge in the ongoing trial, is called the deciding oath/dicissoir.

References

AchmadAli. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence): Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Volume 1. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Asadulloh Al-Faruq. Hukum Acara Peradilan Islam. Cet 1. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2009.

Basri, A H. “Alat Bukti Elektronik Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Hukum Islam.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law 2, no. 2 (2020): 60–67.

Daud, Daud. “Peranan Sumpah Sebagai Alat Bukti Di Dalam Proses Perdata.” Juripol (Jurnal Institusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan) 5, no. 1 (2022): 16–22. https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v5i1.11303.

Eva, Aryani. “Hukum Islam, Demokrasi Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 17, no. 2 (2017): 24–31.

khairatin azizah, muammar bin mosni, kholili anam, mega ayu ningtyas. “Ma’mal : Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum Volume 02, Nomor 01, Februari 2021.” Ma’Mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 02, no. Vol. 2 No. 01 (2021): Februari (2021).

M. Yahya Harahap. Hukum Acara Perdata : Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.

———. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Mardani. Hukum Islam : Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.

Martiman Prodjohamidjojo. Komentar Atas KUHAP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1990.

Muhammad Salam Madkur. Peradilan Dalam Islam. Imron AM. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1993.

R.Soebakti and R.Tjitrosudibio. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Burgelijk Wetboek. Cet. 37. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006.

Riduan Syahrani. Buku Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2004.

Sutopo, Umarwan, Martha Eri Safira, and Neneng Uswatun Khasanah. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama Dalam Teori Dan Praktik, 2021.

Towoliu, Winston Jeremia, Hendrik Pondaag, and Roy Victor Karamoy. “Eksistensi Pengakuan Dan Sumpah Terhadap Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Perdata.” Lex Administratum 10, no. 3 (2022).

Wicaksono, ASHB. “Pembuktian Sumpah Di Peradilan Agama.” Gema, 2015, 1667–74.

The Use of Oath Evidence and Its Implementation (Study in Surakarta Religious Court)

English

Abstract

References