Dimensions of Judges Independence in The Judicial Process

Supriadi  Jufri; Muhammad  Yasmin; Ika  Fitria; Afrilia  Cahyani; Lia Trizza Firgitta  Adhilia

doi:10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51651

Supriadi Jufri Universitas Muhammdiyah Sidenreng Rappang
(ID)
Muhammad Yasmin Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
(ID)
Ika Fitria Universitas Muhammdiyah Sidenreng Rappang
(ID)
Afrilia Cahyani Universitas Muhammdiyah Sidenreng Rappang
(ID)
Lia Trizza Firgitta Adhilia Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51651

Keywords: judge, Integrity, Independence

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and criticize the independence of judges in maintaining integrity and social trust in the judicial process. This type of research is normative research. The results showed that factors that can affect the independence of judges in carrying out their duties. Judges in resolving conflicts faced by them must be able to resolve objectively based on applicable law and the concept of judge independence is a fundamental principle in the judicial system which emphasizes that judges must be able to carry out their duties independently, without pressure or influence from any party. The independence of judges is an important prerequisite in maintaining integrity, fairness and trust in the judicial process in a country. The presence of independent judges ensures that the judicial process is transparent, fair, and in accordance with the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

References

Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (1998). Independence, Judicial Power, and Democracy. Public Choice, 97(1-2), 189-204.

Burbank, S.B., & Friedman, B. (2002). Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Sage Publications.

Choudhry, S. (2008). Judicial Independence and Democratic Accountability: Defining the Terms of the Relationship. Journal of International Constitutional Law, 2(3), 281-304.

Dahl, R.A. (1957). Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker. Journal of Public Law, 6(2), 279-295.

Elizabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar. 2016. Evidentiary Law (Analysis of the Independence of Judges as Law Enforcement Officers in the Evidentiary Process), Bandung: Nuansa Aulia

Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (1998). The Choices Justices Make. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Ferejohn, J. (1999). Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence. Southern California Law Review, 72, 353-384.

Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945

Friedman, B. (2009). The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2015). Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. University of Chicago Press.

Geyh, C.G. (2011). What's Really Wrong with Judicial Elections. Ohio State Law Journal, 62, 33-49.

Guarnieri, C., & Pederzoli, P. (2002). The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2007). Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence. International Review of Law and Economics, 27(3), 269-290.

Helmke, G., & Staton, J. (2011). The Puzzling Judicial Politics of Latin America. Political Science Review, 105(1), 138-154.

Keith, L.C. (2012). Political Repression and Judicial Independence: A Global Survey. International Political Science Review, 33(4), 447-462.

Kritzer, H., & Pickerill, J. (2001). The Politics of Judicial Independence in the United States. Law & Society Review, 35(3), 613-637.

Law No. 48/2009 on Judicial Power

Law Number 49 Year 2009 on General Courts.

Marni Emmy Mustafa. 2019. Bunga Rampai Hukum dan Peradilan, Bandung: Alumni.

Muhammad Ridho, Independence and Confidence of Judges in the Judicial Process, as an Effort to Become an Ideal and Professional Judge, ttps://pa- purwodadi.go.id/index.php/26-front-page/article/359.

Nurlaila Harun, The Judicial Process and the Meaning of a Judge's Belief in Deciding a Case at the Manado Religious Court, Scientific Journal, Vol 15, No. 2, 2017.

Peerenboom, R. (2009). Judicial Independence and Accountability: The Case of China. Journal of Contemporary China, 18(60), 475-493.

Popova, M. (2010). Judicial Independence and Anti-corruption Reform in Russia: A Double-edged Sword. Democratization, 17(4), 763-785.

Rogers, J.R. (2001). Information and Judicial Independence. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 191-206.

Rosas, A. (2012). The Independence of the Judiciary: Some Remarks on the Situation in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 8(3), 407-422.

Sadurski, W. (2012). Judicial Independence and Accountability: Developing a European Perspective. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 8(3), 281-295.

Schiemann, K. (2015). Judicial Independence in Europe: Threat or Opportunity? European Journal of Law Reform, 17(1), 36-48.

Skåre, T. (2017). Political Influence on the Judiciary: Perspectives from European and American Courts. Global Jurist, 17(2), 233-255.

Solberg, R.S., & Waltenburg, E.N. (2006). Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 436-450.

Vanberg, G. (2005). The Politics of Judicial Review: Courts, Policy, and Congressional Response. Princeton University Press.