Analysis of Similarities in Principle and Resolution Between MS Glow and PS Glow Brand Disputes

Risalatul Putri Aulia Kintamani; Basoeky  Wins

doi:10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51764

Risalatul Putri Aulia Kintamani Universitas Diponegoro
(ID)
Basoeky Wins Universitas Diponegoro
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51764

Keywords: Similarities, ; Brands, Disputes

Abstract

This research discusses similarities in essence as regulated in Article 6 paragraph (1) letter b of Law No. 15 of 2001 concerning Trademarks in its explanation regarding the rejection of applications that have similarities in overall terms and conditions of similar goods and services but are detrimental to well-known brands. In this legal research, normative and secondary research is used, including primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by the literature and then analysis techniques are used. The results showed that it is already familiar to the public and the resolution of disputes experienced by the MS GLOW and PSGlow brands is reviewed from Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications.

References

Iswi Hariyani, Correct Procedures for Managing Intellectual Property Rights (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010).

OK. Saidin, Legal Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013).

Julius Rizaldi, Protection of Famous Brand Product Packaging Against Unfair Competition (Bandung: Alumni, 2009).

Tim Lindsey et al., Intellectual Property Rights: An Introduction (Bandung: Alumni, 2011).

Fitrisiah, “Legal Review of Registered Trademark Disputes Due to Similarity to Well-Known Trademarks (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 281 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020 and Decision Number 197 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018).”

Siti Marwiyah, “Legal Protection of Famous Trademarks,” De Jure Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2010)

Mellisa Yanwar, “Elements of Similarity in Principal in Case of Cancellation of Registered Trademark (Case Study of Trademark of PT. Krakatau Steel and Trademark of PT. Perwira Adhitama Sejati),” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53, no. 9 (2016)

RR. Putri Ayu Pramsari, “Application of Good Faith as a Reason for Trademark Cancellation According to Law Number 15 of 2001 Concerning Trademarks (At the Review Level)” (Diponegoro University, 2010).

Sendy Anugrah, “Elements of Similarity in Basic Terms in Trademark Registration According to Law Number 20 of 2016 Concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications and Its Implementation in Practice in Connection with Violations of Famous Trademarks,” Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum) 2, no. 1 (2019): 18–37, https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v2i1.4663.

Henry Soelistyo, Badfaith in Trademark Law (Yogyakarta: PT Maharsa Artha Mulia, 2017).

Eko Yuliyanto, “Executorial Decision of Registered Brand Cancellation,” Indonesia Private Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 11–22, https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v1i1.2044.

MH Prof. Dr. Rahmi Jened, sh, Trademark Law (Jakarta: Kencana, 2014).

By Esti Aryani, “Trademark Rights Violations and Their Settlement Mechanisms in Indonesia,” Legal Discourse 10, no. 1 (nd): 117–32, http://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Wacana/article/view/269%0Ahttp://garuda.ristekdikti.go.id/journal/article/114773.

Fransisca Glovany, Legal Analysis of Compensation for Infringement of Trademarks of Non Synonymous Goods in Indonesia, Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Keluarga, Vol.6(2) 2024

Rosyidah, Trademark Dispute Resolution According to Law No. 30 of 1999 Concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Novum Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1 (2) 2014