STUDENTS LEARNING OUTCOMES DIFFERENCES ON AKIDAH AKHLAK: A STUDY OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODELS ON JIGSAW-TYPE AND STAD-TYPE OF KALAM SCIENCE MAIN TOPIC AT CLASS XI IN MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 1 POLEWALI MANDAR
Abstract
This study examines the learning outcomes of students in moral academia subjects using jigsaw and STAD-type cooperative learning models in MAN 1 Polewali Mandar. This research is a pseudo-experiment. The samples were class XI IPA 1 and class XI IPS 2, both given treatment (treatment). Class XI IPA 1 was given the treatment of the jigsaw-type cooperative learning model, and class XI social studies two was given the treatment of STAD type cooperative learning model. In data collection, researchers used tests, observations, and documentation. The data obtained were then processed using an independent test formula of the t-test sample, with the help of the SPSS version 25 application. The results of the study obtained in the two groups through descriptive statistical analysis, the average learning outcomes of akidah akhlak using the jigsaw type learning model were = 81.25. In contrast, the average learning outcomes of Akidah akhlak using the STAD-type cooperative learning model were = 79.60. The results of the data homogeneity analysis showed that the F-value = 1.343 ≤ Ftabel = 4.10 expressed the sample data as homogeneous. For the Hypothesis test, the t-test showed that what was obtained was calculated as 1.76 < table 1.991, this shows that H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected, so it can be concluded that there is no difference in learning outcomes in classes taught with the jigsaw-type and the STAD-type cooperative-learning model class XI science one and class XI IPS 2 in MAN 1 Polewali Mandar.
References
Arends, Learning to Teaceh, New York: Graw Hill Companis, 1997.Alang M. Sattu, Kesehatan Mental dan Terapi Islam. Makassar: CV. Berkah Utami Makassar, 2005.
Depdikbud, Kamus Lengkap Indonesia . Cet. IV; Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1989.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono, Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2015.
Hamka, “perbandingan hasil belajar pendidikan agama islam menggunkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan jigsaw di SMAN 2 Polewali”. Tesis. Makassar: Pendidikan Agama Islam Pascasarja UIN Alauddin, 2020.
Hidayanto, Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Cet. I; Semarang: CV. IKIP, 1998.
Hosnan, Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21 . Bogor: Ghalia Indonesi, 2014.
Huda Miftahul, Cooperative Learning Metode, Teknik, Struktur dan Model Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Isjoni, Cooperative Learning Mengembangkan Kemampuan Belajar Berkelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta 1997.
Khalifah Mustami Muh, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Aynat Publishing, 2015.
Lie Anita, Cooperatif Learning. Jakarta: Grasindo, 1994.
Lukman Syahril dkk, “Pengeruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan STAD Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Nenegi 1 Jatinom Klaten Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014”, GeoEco 2, no. 2 2016.
Nurhadi dan Agus Gerrad Senduk, Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning/CTL) dan Penerapannya dalam KBK, Malang: UM PRESS, 2003.
Nurul Hanifah, “Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Materi Elastisitas Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Student Archievment Division (STAD) Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Banda Aceh”, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pendidikan Fisika, Vol 1, no. 3 (Juli 2016)
Rahmah Nurul, “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dalam Mata Pelajaran Akidah dan Akhlak dengan Menggunakan Model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Banjarmasing” Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan 3, no. 2 Juli-Desember (2018): h. 2-147.
Sanjaya, Wina. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Slameto. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2003.
Slavin Robert E., “Cooperative Learning: theory, research and pratice, terj. Narulita Yusron, Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik”. Bandung, Nusa Media 2016.
Solihatin Etin, Cooperative Learning. Analisis Model Pembelajaran IPS. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.
Sugianto, dkk, “perbedaan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan STAD ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematika siswa SMA di Binjai”, Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, vol 1, no. 1 (April 2014), h. 125.
Suprihatiningrum Jamil, Strategi Pembelajaran Teori & Praktik. Yogyakarta, Ar RuzzMedia, 2013.
Trianto, Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktifistik: Konsep, Landasan Teoretis Praktis dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2007.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Bab II Pasal 3.
Wena Made, Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer, Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. PT Bumi Aksara: Jakarta, 2014.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mustamin Mustamin, Ilyas Ismail, Wahyuni Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
