LAMEMBA AS AN INDEPENDENT ACREDITATION BODY: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT, READINESS AND CHALLENGES

  • Khalilah Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Fakultas Imu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
    (ID)
Keywords: Accreditation, Study Program, LAMEMBA, Education Management, HIgher Education, Quality Management

Abstract

The authority to accreditate the study programs related with the field studies of economic, business, management and accounting was granted to Independent accreditation institution for economic, business, management and accounting study programs that is named as LAMEMBA, as imposed by National Accreditation Body for Higher Education’s regulation number 9/2020. This paper examines how this institution evolved and is being ready to do so and what challenges it encountered while managing to do so. Adopting a descriptive case study method, this paper reveals that this institution was established by Indonesian economic scholar association (ISEI), Indonesian accounting association (IAI) and Association of Indonesian Economic and Business Faculties (AFEBI) in 14 August 2019. Though being quite capable to serve as independent accreditation body to acreditate these aformentioned study programs, it encountered the following challenges: (1) total number of professional assessors is too small; (2) these assessors have had not enough time and resources to do so; and (3) most of these study programs are not fully capable to meet the minimum standard of accreditation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boyatzis, R. . (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2007). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative Inquiry: Thematic, Narrative and Arts-Informed Perspectives. London : Sage Publications Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.

de Paor, C. (2016). The contribution of Professional Accreditation to Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 22(3), 228–241.

Frank, A., Kurth, D., & Mironowicz, I. (2012). Accreditation and Quality Assurance for Professional Degree Programmes: Comparing Approaches in Three European Countries. Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), 75–95.

Haakstad, J. (2001). Accreditation: The New Quality Assurance Formula? Some Reflections as Norway is About to Reform its quality assurance system. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 77–82.

Hernandez-Fernandez, J., Perez-Duran, I., & Portugal-Celaya, B. (2021). Regulation and Quality Assurance Agencies of Higher Education in Mexico. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 40(4), 518–533.

Idrus, A., A., Karnan, K., & Setiadi, D. (2018). Analisis Kesiapan Akreditasi Berbasis SAPTO Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Mataram. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 3(1), 221–216.

Jarvis, D. S. . (2014). Regulating Higher Education: Quality Assurance and Neo-Liberal Managerialism in Higher Education--A critical Introduction. Policy and Society, 33(3), 155–166.

Kamal, B., & Rahmadiane, G. . (2017). Pengaruh Persepsi, Akreditasi Prodi, Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Memilih Program Studi Akuntansi Pada Politeknik Harapan Bersama. Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis & Manajemen, 1(2), 145–158.

Komotar, M. (2021). Accreditation in European Higher Education from The Comparative Perspective: Slovenia and The Netherlands. Quality in Higher Education, 27(2), 149–167.

Manimala, M. ., Wasdani, K. ., & Vijaygopal, A. (2021). Facilitation and Regulation of Educational Institutions: The Role of Accreditation. VIKALPA The Journal for Decision Makers, 45(1), 7–24.

Mardiono, I., Fil’aini, R., & Didin, F. . (2019). Perancangan Sistem Basis Data Offline Dokumen Akreditasi Program Studi. Jurnal OPSI, 12(21), 101–107.

Mursidi, A., Murdani, E., Soeharto, S., Sumarli, S., Ting, I.-H., & Wu, J. . (2019). Development of Internal Quality Assurance Model in Higher Education Institution. New York : Association for Computing Machinery.

Nisa, E. . (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Akreditasi Program Studi Terhadap Intensitas Belajar dan Harapan Masa Depan: Studi Kasus di Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Walisongo Semarang. At-Taqaddum, 10(2), 201–218.

Romanowski, M. . (2022). The Idolatry of Accreditation in Higher Education: Enhancing Our Understanding. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 153–167.

Simangunsong, E. (2018). Factors Determining the Quality Management of Higher Education: A Case Study at a Business School in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 215–227.

Sutopo, S., Sugiyono, S., & Setiadi, B. . (2019). Analysis of the Accreditation Grade of Study Programs of Higher Education in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 335, 1st International Conference on Education, Social.

Widagdo, P. ., Ramadiani, R., Maharani, S., & Junirianto, E. (2019). Sistem Informasi Akreditasi Program Studi di Fakultas Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi Universitas Mulawarman. QUERY: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 3(1), 22–35.

Yin, R. B. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods. London : Sage Publication.

Yulianingsih, Y. (2015). Manajemen Akreditasi Program Studi Pada Perguruan Tinggi. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 5(1), 92–116.

Published
2022-12-16
Section
Vol 6 No 2
Abstract viewed = 96 times