THE IMPACT OF DISSENTING OPINION PHPU 2024 ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAW AND DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA

Azis Rahman; Kurniati

doi:10.24252/jat.v4i2.53957

Azis Rahman Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
(ID)
Kurniati Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
(ID)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jat.v4i2.53957

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This research discusses the dissenting opinion made by the three judges in the 2024 PHPU decision, as it is known that dissenting opinion is a difference of opinion of the judges, this dissenting opinion includes a description of the judge's argumentation in a particular case. Experts say that this dissenting opinion is an alternative to future legal reform, because it contains genuine ideas that are different from the nature of decisions which are sometimes still casuistic. This dissenting opinion is an interesting event in the 2024 PHPU dispute, looking at the judge's decision regarding the 2004 election dispute with the decision of the judges in seeking the election dispute decision process there is no difference, if they have not yet found a bright spot for different decisions, a RPH or Consultative Meeting of Judges is held, until they find a mutual agreement. Therefore, to answer these problems, this research comes by using library research. The essence of dissenting opinion cannot provide legal certainty because legal certainty basically has its products, there is a source and legal basis, but if legal certainty does not have legal force or legal basis, it is not legal certainty. The judge's dissenting opinion is in line with the principle of democracy which reflects the guarantee of the right to dissent in deciding a case. The right to dissent shows the existence of a legal system that respects pluralism and freedom of expression.

Keywords: Legal certainty; Dissenting Opinion; Democracy.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Aminah, Siti. Menajadi Sahabat Keadilan Panduan Menyusun Amicus Brief. 1st ed. Jakarta: The Indonesian Legal Resource Center (ILRC), 2014.
Tim Rebahan Learning Center. UUD 1945 Dan Amandemennya. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Garda Cendekia, 2023.

Jurnal
Aminah, Siti. Menajadi Sahabat Keadilan Panduan Menyusun Amicus Brief. 1st ed. Jakarta: The Indonesian Legal Resource Center (ILRC), 2014.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif Dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, Dan Relevansi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 159–85.
Badri, Ainul. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36 / PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Hak Angket Menurut Prespektif Hukum Islam.” JAH (Jurnal Analisis Hukum) 3, no. 1 (2022): 25–30.
Dion Untung Wijaya, Agustinus Manurung, Yogi Angistya Tamara, Mijan, Thariq Muslim, and Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja. “Amicus Curiae: Dalam Sidang PHPU Pilpres 2024.” Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research (FJSR) 3, no. 6 (2024): 1277–84.
Edo Maranata Tambunan, Rya Elita Br Sembiring, Frederick Gozali, and Dwi Mei Roito Sianturi. “Analisis Eksistensi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Beritegritas Dan Akuntabel.” IBLAM Law Review 4, no. 2 (2024): 50–61.
Firdaus, Sunny Ummul, Putri Anjelina Nataly Panjaitan, and Rizky Kurniyanto Widyasasmito. “Peran Dissenting Opinion Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Penbaharuan Hukum Sosial.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 1 (2020): 1–10.
Heryani, Wiwie. “Analisis Hukum Empiris Terhadap Dissenting Opinion Dalam Putusan Hakim.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 1, no. 2 (2012): 264–80.
Hidayatullah, Yudhi Lestanata, and Darmansyah. “Tinjauan Historis Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum (PHPU) Dan Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan (PHP) Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK).” Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education 8, no. 2 (2022): 1019–26.
Laluyan, Jerry Mario. “Dissenting Opinion Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex et Societatis 3, no. 9 (2015): 70–78.
Markus Marselinus Soge, Riskon Sitorus. “Kajian Hukum Progresif Terhadap Fungsi Permasyarakatan Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Permasyarakatan.” Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan 2, no. 2 (2022): 80–101.
Najah, Savinatun, Dewi Ayu Marchela Putri, Ike Zhiana Huzaini, and Hayat. “Analisis Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum (PHPU) Pilpres 2024 Terhadap Kualitas Demokrasi Indonesia.” Idarotuna : Journal of Administrative Science 5, no. 1 (2024): 85–97.
Pebrianto, Roli, and Syarif Dahlan. “Analisis Sengketa PHPU Pilpres Tahun 2024 Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif (Studi Kasus Putusan MK No. 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024).” Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan 5, no. 1 (2024): 85–103.
Rusdi, Muhammad. “Implikasi Dissenting Opinion Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat.” Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 89–107.
Suat, Muammad Saleh. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Disertai Dengan Pendapat Hakim Berbeda (Dissenting Opinion) Dalam Pemenuhan Prinsip-Prinsip Keadilan.” Al-Qodiri Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Keagamaan 20, no. 3 (2023): 732–47.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Konstitusi, Mahkamah. “Putusan Nomor 1/Phpu. Pres-XXii/2024 Tentang Perselisihan Hasil Acara Pemilihan Umum,” 2024.

Internet/Website
Tv, Kompas. “Kata 3 Hakim Yang Dissenting Opinion Putusan Sengketa Pilpres 2024, Singgung Bansos Hingga PSU.” 22 April 2024, 2024. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/501956/kata-3-hakim-mk-yang-dissenting-opinion-putusan-sengketa-pilpres-2024-singgung-bansos-hingga-psu?page=all.