ANALISIS KOMPARASI KINERJA KEUANGAN PT. BANK PERKREDITAN PHIDECTAMA ABEPURA DENGAN PT. BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT IRIAN SENTOSA JAYAPURA

  • Helmi Toatubun
  • Darwis Darwis
  • Erlina Yulianti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jiap.v7i2.26853

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan perbandingan kinerja keuangan BPR Phidectama dengan BPR Irian Sentosa dengan menggunakan rasio likuiditas, solvabilitas dan profitabilitas. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah teknik statistik independent sample t-test (Uji Beda). Hasil uji statistik independent sample t-test untuk rasio likuiditas yaitu quick ratio, banking ratio, loan to assets ratio dan loan to deposit ratio menunjukkan ada perbedaan kinerja keuangan antara BPR Phidectama dan BPR Irian Sentosa. Rasio solvabilitas menunjukkan ada perbedaan kinerja keuangan antara BPR Phidectama dan BPR Irian Sentosa. Sedangkan dari sisi rasio profitabilitas yaitu return on equity menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan kinerja keuangan, selanjutnya net profit margin, return on assets dan rasio BOPO menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan kinerja keuangan antara BPR  Phidectama dan BPR Irian Sentosa.

Kata Kunci : likuiditas, solvabilitas, profitabilitas

This study aims to compare the financial performance of BPR Phidectama with BPR Irian Sentosa by using the ratio of liquidity, solvency and profitability. The analytical method used is the statistical technique of independent sample t-test (Difference Test). The results of the independent sample t-test statistical test for liquidity ratios, namely quick ratio, banking ratio, loan to assets ratio and loan to deposit ratio, showed that there were differences in financial performance between BPR Phidectama and BPR Irian Sentosa. The solvency ratio shows that there is a difference in financial performance between BPR Phidectama and BPR Irian Sentosa. Meanwhile, in terms of profitability ratios, namely return on equity, it shows that there are differences in financial performance, then net profit margin, return on assets and BOPO ratios show no differences in financial performance between BPR Phidectama and BPR Irian Sentosa.

Keywords : liquidity, solvency, profitability

Referensi

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abdullah, M. Faisal. (2005). Manajemen Perbakan (Teknik Analisa Kinerja Keuangan Bank). Penerbit: UMM Press, Malang.

Arinta, Yusvita, Nena. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan antara Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional. Jurnal Muktasid, Volume 7, Nomor 1.

Dendawijaya, Lukman. (2001). Manajemen perbankan. Penerbit : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Faisol, Ahmad. (2007). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk. Bandar Lampung: Jurnal Bisnis dan Management Vol 3 No. 2.

Gan, I. dan Amalia, Siti. (2015). Alat Analisis Data: Aplikasi Statistik untuk Penelitian Bidang Ekonomi dan Sosial. Penerbit : Andi, Yogyakarta.

Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia. (2015). Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) No. 1 Penyajian Laporan Keuangan (Revisi 9). Penerbit : Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Kasmir. (2012). Manajemen Perbankan. Penerbit: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

------------. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Cetakan ke-7. Penerbit : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Lestari, Maharani. Ika dan Toto Sugiharto. (2007). Kinerja Bank Devisa dan Bank Non Devisa dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Universitas Gunadarma.

Puspitasari, Maya. (2009). Analisis Komparatif Kinerja Bank Syariah Dan Bank Pemerintah Konvensional Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Vol. 7, No. 1, hal: 46 -53.

Tim Penyusun. (2008). Pedoman Akuntansi Perbankan Indonesia. Penerbit : Bank Indonesia, Jakarta.

Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan.

Diterbitkan
2021-12-21
Terbitan
Vol 7 No 2 (2021)
Bagian
Vol 7, No. 2

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Under the following terms of Creative Commons:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

 
Abstrak viewed = 215 times