The Role of Siyāsah Shar'iyyah in Analyzing and Addressing Land Disputes
Abstract
Disputes are often reported from complexities related to land ownership, particularly when multiple parties lay claim to a specific plot acquired through gifting or inheritance. Public objections predominantly center around preventing inaccuracies in the transfer of ownership rights during the recording of land blocks at National Land Office (BPN) concerning blocking of ownership rights. Therefore, this study aims to examine the prevalent issues encountered during the recording of land title certificate, with a specific focus on the common land disputes that lead to legal proceedings. An analytical framework of siyāsah shar'iyyah is adopted with empirical juridical methodology using a socio-juridical perspective. The data-gathering method comprises three distinct stages, namely reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results show that the submission of a plot of land for registration cannot be executed by any arbitrary party. A clear understanding of applicant's status and the rationale behind the request is necessary to restrict the use of land effectively. In this context, the registration of land blocks has diverse effects in terms of economic, socio-cultural, and legal assurance. The challenges encountered in the act of obstructing are predominantly rooted in the administrative procedure. Therefore, the proposed remedy includes the use of technology based on electronic systems to effectively disseminate information to the public. In this jurisdiction, land ownership is primarily governed by Sharia law, which views documenting property rights as a method of promoting good governance. Meanwhile, zoning arrangements serve as an alternative for documenting land blocking, mitigating potential ownership issues in the future.
References
Al Munawar, F. A. (2021). ‘Abd al-Majīd al-Najjār’s Perspective on Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 20(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.4281
Angraeni, N., & Primadhany, E. F. (2022). Sociological and Philosophical Study of Ijārah and Ijārah Muntahiya Bi Tamlik. El-Mashlahah, 12(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v12i1.4174
Asnan, M. F., & Mahmudah, S. (2023). Juridical Review of the Issuance of Land Certificates without a Statement of Release of Land Rights (SPPHT) from the Previous Landowner. Unes Law Review, 6(1), 1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.975
Aziza, M. N., & Arif, L. (2023). Application of Good Governance Principles in Land Acquisition for Cemeteryn Masangan Kulon Village, Sukodono District, Sidoarjo Regency. Jurnal Aristo (Social, Politic, Humaniora, 10(3), 610–629. https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v10i3.6585
Buana, E. A., & Raharjo, P. S. (2021). Legal Protection of the Winner of the Mortgage Auction in the Process of Transferring Land Rights by Auction. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 7(2), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i2.37982
Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Bornacelly, I., & Hole, D. G. (2021). Nature-dependent people: Mapping human direct use of nature for basic needs across the tropics. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102368
Fitrawadi Nst, E. (2021). Implementation of Block Recording of Land Rights in the Land Book by Non-Title Holders at the West Pasaman District Land Office. UNES Law Review, 3(4), 418–427. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v3i4.204
Gojali, D. (2022). The Position of Islamic Law in the Legality of Land Ownership in Indonesia. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 15(4), 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-004105
Ibrahim, F. A., & Yusriyadi, H. (2018). Blocking of Land Book Performed by the Purchaser Based on Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement. Notarius, 11, 43–53.
Iqbal, N., & Gill, Z. A. (2000). The Concept of Land Ownership in Islam and Poverty Alleviation in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 39(4), 349–362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41260289
Islamiyati, Hendrawati, D., Musyafah, A. A., Hakimah, A., & Markom, R. (2022). Religious Practices of Land Endowment: Examining Reform and Dispute Resolution Alternatives of Land Waqf in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(3), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.18488/74.v9i3.3204
Isman, A. F., & Kaltsum, U. (2022). The relevance of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in maqāṣid al- sharī‘ah dimensions. Journal of Islamic Economics, Management, and Business, 4(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.21580/jiemb.2022.4.2.13185
Istiana, Sutarni, N., & Pranawa, B. (2022). Implementation of Blocking of Land Rights Certificates Based on Permen ATR / Head of BPN Number 13 of 2017 (Case Study at the Land Office of Boyolali Regency). Jurnal Bedah Hukum, 6(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v6i1.767
Jha, G. K., Styawati, N. K. A., & Sumardika, I. N. (2022). Encumbrance of Mortgage Rights on Uncertified Land. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 5(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.5.1.2022.56-60
Karimullah, S. S. (2023). The Relevance of the Concept of Justice in Islamic Law to Contemporary Humanitarian Issues. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v8i1.7654
Karjoko, L., Jaelani, A. K., Tegnan, H., Glaser, H., & Hayat, M. J. (2021). Islamic Court’s Approach to Land Dispute in Inheritance Cases. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v21i2.21864
Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/ Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/ Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/103795/permen-agrariakepala-bpn-no-13-tahun-2017
Komaruddin, K. (2020). Fairness in the distribution of land ownership in Indonesia based on Islamic law perspective. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 20(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v20i2.211-234
Lapatantja, N. A., & Bakry, M. (2021). Comparative Analyses of Maliki and Hanbali Thought on Waqf Istibdal. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 3(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v3i1.21129
Mangku, D. G. S. (2020). Implementation Of Technical Sub Committee Border Demarcation And Regulation (TSC-BDR) Agreement Between Indonesia - Timor Leste In The Resolution Of The Land Border Dispute. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(30). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.800
Menropa, H., Saribu, D., Purba, R., & Suryana, A. (2023). Government Efforts To Prevent Overlaps In Certificate Issuance Through Measurement And Mapping. International Journal of Social, Policy, and Law, 4(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v4i2.131
Minhaji, A. (1996). The Great Yasa and The Siyasah Shari’iyah Some Comparative Observation. Unisia, 16(29), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol16.iss29.art7
Monalu, T. J., Sumakul, T. F., & Sondakh, M. T. (2023). The Juridical Position of the Issuance of Land Certificates to the Electronic System as a Security Guarantee. Lex Privatum, 11(2).
Mulyanto, E., & Adillah, S. U. (2022). Legal Protection of Land Rights Certificate Holders in Certificate Blocking Event by Land Office. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 3(4), 1375. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1375-1391
Murni, C. S., Kelen, B. B., & Sulaiman, S. (2022). the Legal Certainty of Land Ownership Right in Registration’S Context. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v6i1.16422
Muyasaroh, & Herlina. (2022). Toll Road Development and Environmental Change: A Maqashidi Study at Indralaya – Muara Enim. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(3), 821–862. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art8
Naway, M., & Elfikri, N. F. (2022). Untangling the Causes of Land Ownership Disputes. Estudiante Law Journal, 4(2), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18183
Octaviani, S., & Purwadi, H. (2022). Multiple land rights ownership certificates: a legal guarantee question. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 28(1), 30–34. https://ijbel.com/previous-issues/december-2022/vol-28-december-2022-issue-1/
Pattikraton, M. A., & Silviana, A. (2023). Recording the Confiscation of Land Rights Certificates at the Land Office of Bandar Lampung City. Wajah Hukum, 7(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1223
Powers, M. R., & Nugraheni, P. D. (2021). Transfer from Land Rights to Right of Building Use of Land from Stock Capital in the Limited Liability Company. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.40584
Roberts, R. J. (2021). Re-spatializing Gangs: An Exponential Random Graph Model of Twitter Data to Analyze the Geospatial Distribution of Gang Member Connections. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 15(2), 18–43. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766541
Safitri, M. (2020). Efforts to Realize Legal Certainty of Land Ownership in Lampung through Blocking of Land Certificate. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 1(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v1i2.2147
Sait, S., & Lim, H. (2006). Land, Law and Islam: Property and Human Rights in the Muslim World. Zed Books.
Salim, A. (2019). Settlement of Legal Disputes Against Certificate Holders of Property Rights with the Issuance of Multiple Certificates. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 2(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2269
Sanniawati, S., Muhjad, M. H., & Yusran, A. (2023). Implications of Ownership Certificates that Overlap with Business Use Rights Certificates. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(08), 4721–4731. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i8-14
Sekarsari, A., Budhiawan, H., & Nurasa, A. (2019). Implementation of Block Recording of Land Rights Certificates (Study at the Sleman and Bantul District Land Offices). Tunas Agraria, 2(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v2i2.32
Setiyabudi, H. K. P. (2020). Legal Review of Blocking on Land Book in Land Registration. Lex Et Societatis, 8(3), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i3.29497
Suartining, N. K., & Djaja, B. (2023). Land Rights in the Land Law System in Indonesia According to the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960. Journal of Social Research, 2(6), 1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i6.903
Suharyono. (2019). Legal Assurance and Legal Protection in Land Registration in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 3(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss1.118.pp48-58
Syatar, A., Imran, M., Ilham, M., Kurniati, K., Marilang, M., & Marjuni, K. N. (2023). Examining Call for the Dissolution of Indonesian Ulema Council: Siyāsah Syar’íyyah Perspective. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.6678
Syuryani, & Ardian, Y. (2023). Blocking of Land Rights Certificates Experiencing Disputes for Orderly Land Administration at the Padang Pariaman Regency Land Office. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 6(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.4086
Tediosaputro, L., & Sukarningsih, R. M. (2023). Electronic Land Certificate Versus Analog Land Certificate in Proof of Ownership Certainty. Proceedings of the International Conference On Law, Economics, and Health (ICLEH 2022), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_18
Thalib, P., & Abrianto, B. (2019). the Comparative Study of Fiqh Siyasah With the General Principles of Good Government in Indonesia. Arena Hukum, 12(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01202.1
Tjandraningsih, D., & Khan, R. (2023). Analysis of Legal Protection for Owners of Multiple Land Certificates Issued The Badan Pertanahan Nasional. The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 1(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.58818/ijlrsa.v1i1.40
Tolo, E. Y. S. (2018). Collective Land Certification Policy as an Alternative to Land Conflict Resolution and Rural Development in Flores , Indonesia. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v23i2.9005
Tyastuti, N. H., & Nuswardhani. (2021). Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Yang Telah Di Blokir Oleh Pihak Lain (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta) [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/90747/
Ulfa, J., & Andraini, F. (2020). Legal Protection and Position of Right Holders Against Blocking of Land Rights Certificates by the Land Office. Dinamika Hukum, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v25i2.8328
Wahyuni, H. A., Silviana, A., & Sukirno. (2016). Effectiveness of One Day Service Implementation in the Bureaucratic Reform Quick Wins Program of the National Land Agency (Study at the Depok City Land Office). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 1–14.
Wigana, A. (2019). Political Directions For Land Law On Land Property Rights For The People. The 5th International and Call Paper: Legal Reconstruction in Indonesia Based on Human Rights, 92. http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/apic/article/view/10988/4229
Wiryani, F., & Najih, M. (2021). The criticism of land procurement law to improve landowners welfare in indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 5(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1073.pp175-191
Copyright (c) 2024 Syafa'at Anugrah Pradana, Hasanuddin Hasim, Muhammad Imam Dhiya’ul Haq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.