Comparative Analysis of Judges' Decisions on Debts and Credits as Reasons for Divorce in the Class 1A Religious Court of Makassar

  • Muh. Mudassir Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Azman Arsyad Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
Keywords: Divorce, Debts and Receivables, Religious Courts

Abstract

The main problem in this research is related to the Comparative Analysis of Judges' Decisions on Debts and Receivables as a Reason for Divorce that occurred in the Makassar Class 1A Religious Court which aims to find out why Indonesian law does not make debts and receivables a basis for divorce, and to find out what factors are taken into consideration. the judge in granting a divorce case because of debts and receivables. The research method used by the author is qualitative research, which was carried out at the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court. Data sourced from cases 1) 2855/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mks, 2) 1847/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mks, and 2) 2847/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mks, Judges, Figures Religion, Posbakum and Society. Field research techniques are research that is directly related to the research object being studied as well as Library Research, interviews and documentation. The data analysis processing is through deductive, inductive analysis and comparative methods. The results of this research are that the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court decision case is by referring to the arguments of the lawsuit, evidence, and the statements of witnesses. The judge's considerations in granting the divorce petition filed by the husband against his wife were because they had debts for which no solution could be found for peace and harmony in their household. Meanwhile, according to Islamic law regarding the talak divorce case which the applicant submitted to the Makasar Religious Court on the grounds that the wife had a lot of debt, Islam views this divorce case as basically having no reason regarding debts and receivables, but because debts and receivables are the main reason husband and wife often experience problems. disputes and quarrels which cause there to be no longer a harmonious relationship and cannot be maintained, with that Islam views that this is a case of shiqaq (a sharp and continuous dispute between husband and wife) regarding responsibility for debts at the time of divorce, then debts arising from wrongdoing. one husband or wife cannot be transferred to that party without the knowledge or consent of the other party. In the absence of prior agreement from both parties, personal debts cannot be settled with the couple's personal assets or joint assets. So, in a situation like this, the party concerned will bear responsibility for the loan.

References

Abdul Rahman Ghozali. Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Abdullah, A, and N Aisyah. “Fenomena Faktor Dominan Tingginya Perceraian Di Kabupaten Maros.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah … 04, no. 3 (2023): 1021–36. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v4i3.33183.
abdurrahman. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. jakarta: akademi pressindo, 2007.
Akmal, Andi Muhammad, and Mulham Jaki Asti. “Problematika Nikah Siri, Nikah Online Dan Talak Siri Serta Implikasi Hukumnya Dalam Fikih Nikah.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 45. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v1i1.22247.
Al-Farran, Syekh Ahmad bin Musthafa. Tafsir Imam Syafi’i. jakarta: almahira, 2008.
Amir Syarifuddin. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia: Antara Fiqh Munakahat Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinaan,. Edited by Iskandar. 1st ed. jakarta: prenada media group, 2006.
Andi Fitri Annizha H, Muhammad Sabir Maidin. “DASAR PENETAPAN HAKIM DALAM MENENTUKAN KADAR NAFKAH MUT’AH (Studi Kasus Cerai Talak Istri Sebagai Wanita Karir Dan Istri Sebagai IRT Di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Klas 1A).” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–20. https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/shautuna/article/view/12421.
Asriani, Asriani, and Abdul Wahid Haddade. “Kedudukan Taklik Talak Dalam Pernikahan Perspektif Mazhab Zahiri Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum, 2021, 333–39. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i2.19348.
Azizah, Nur, and Muhammad Anis. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Melalui E-Commerce Di Gowa.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 735–42. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.22245.
Chen, Elizabeth, Muhamad Ibnu Afif, William Jason, Cancolio Frederick Sidauruk, and Salsabila Permata Anugrah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pengguna Pinjaman Online Ilegal.” Prosiding Serina 1, no. 1 (2021): 2045–52. https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v1i1.18080.
Darmiyanto, Darmiyanto, and Azman Arsyad. “Konsep Belis Dalam Tradisi Perkawinan Masyarakat Di Manggarai Timur; Perspektif Perbandingan Mazhab Hanafi Dan Al-Syafi’i.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum, 2021, 421–28. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i2.19180.
gatot supramono. Perjanjian Utang Piutang. 1st ed. jakarta: kencana, 2013.
Hukum, Kebijakan, Pidana Terhadap, Pelaku Yang, Membawa Atau, Mentransfer Uang, Hasil Perjudian, T H E Criminal, et al. “Universitas Jember Fakultas Hukum 2011,” 2011.
Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Terjemah Dan Tajwid Berwarna. bandung: forum corrdoba, 2020.
Kementrian Agama RI. Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan. bandung: fokusmedia, 2018.
Kepada, Diajukan, Fakultas Syariah, Hukum Untuk, Memenuhi Salah, Satu Persyaratan, Memperoleh Gelar, and Sarjana Syariah. “Azhar Nasution.FSH(0),” 2014.
Kutluturk, Cemil. “Princess Durrusehvar Sultan’s Selfless Struggle for Uplifting the Social Status of Hyderabadi Women.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2185282.
m. quraish shihab. Tafsir Al-Misbah. 2nd ed. jakarta: lantera hati, 2002.
Maloko, M Thahir. “Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Kota Makassar ; Studi Analisis Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dan Hukum Islam” 04, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v4i3.32877.
Musyahid, Achmad. “DISKURSUS MASLAHAT MURSALAH ERA MILINEAL (Tinjauan Filosofis Terhadap Konsep Maslahat Imam Malik).” Mazahibuna 1, no. 2 (2019): 134–45.
nasrun haroen. Fiqh Muamalah. Terbaru. jakarta: gaya media pratama, 2019.
Nur Hikmawati, Abdi Wijaya. “Saksi Terhadap Pembatalan Rencana Pernikahan Akibat Perjodohan Menurut Hukum Adat Dan Islam” volume 1, no. no 3 (2016): h. 60.
Nur Isnaini, Latifah, and Fadli Andi Natsif. “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 13/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Mrs TENTANG GUGATAN HARTA BERSAMA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA MAROS.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum, 1970, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i3.15453.
Nur Khaera, Abdul Rahman, and Kurniati. “The Paradigm of Islamic Legal Products in Indonesia.” Mazahibuna 4, no. 1 (2022): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.vi.26364.
Of, Determination, Ujrah On, and Syariah Medan. “AL RISALAH: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum” 23, no. 2 (2023): 220–35.
Pemahaman Masyarakat Terhadap Keduduksn Sunrang di Kecamatan Pallangga Kab. Gowa. “Abdul Rahman Qayyum| Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juni 2020 122.” Perbandingan Mazhab 2 (2020): 128.
Putusan, Direktori, Mahkamah Agung, Republik Indonesia, Agama Islam, and Pekerjaan Pensiunan Asn. “Hk Am Ep u Ah Am Ah k Ep Gu Ng Ka Ah Gu h Ik In d Es In Do Ne Ub Lik In Do Ne Si Ng Hk Am Ep u Am Ah k m Ka Ub Lik Gu h In d Es In Do Ng Ub Lik In Do a Ng,” 2021.
Quraish Shihab. Tafsir Al-Mishbah. Analytical Biochemistry. Vol. 11, 2002. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-7%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103%0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/.
R. subekti. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Edited by tjitrosudibio. 41st ed. Jakarta Pradnya Paramita, 2013.
Ramadana, Fitri, and Abdul Halim Talli. “Kedudukan Anak Dalam Kandungan Dari Perkawinan Yang Dibatalkan Akibat Tidak Ada Izin Poligami Perspektif Imam Syafi’i Dan Imam Hanafi.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 265–79. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i1.15437.
Saf, Mhd. Abduh, and Fadli Andi Natsif. “Persoalan HAM Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Yasini 3, no. 1 (2019): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i1.9975.
Sayid Sabiq. Fiqih Sunnah. sukoharjo: insan kamil, 2016.
Syaikh Ahmad Musthafa al-Farran. Tafsir Imam Syafi’i. Edited by Tim Almahira. jakarta: Almahira, 2008.
Zuhaili, Wahba. Fiqhi Islam Wa Adillatuhu. 1st ed. jakarta: gema insani, 2011.
Published
2024-09-30
How to Cite
Muh. Mudassir, & Arsyad, A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Judges’ Decisions on Debts and Credits as Reasons for Divorce in the Class 1A Religious Court of Makassar. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v5i3.49143
Abstract viewed = 27 times