DAMPAK KOMUNIKASI BISNIS TERHADAP KINERJA ORGANISASI DI PERUSAHAAN
Abstract
The objective of this research is to go into the impact of business communication toward organisation performance in a company. In business, there is a message communicated through some communication channels such as Internet, print media, radio, television, and so forth. It is whether to be reached or not the significant change of organisation performance as an outcome of business communication. This research is done to investigate the relation business communication and organisation performance in the company by applying literatures as research instrument based on a context and to quantify the implication “Construction” which is studied. Applying a survey method, this study collects 100 manufacture companies and services which operate in Makassar. The research instrument shows that reliability and validity are valid. The data is analyzed by descriptive statistic, percent, and examination analysis of ‘t’. This research found out that effective business communication is highlighted on the fair level in the companies which are surveyed. It is also found that there is an effective business communication in the practice level which is related to business categories and its dimensions.
References
Alysa, G. (2005). 12 secrets of effective business communication. Posted in HW to’s – 35 comment by Noupe.
Blalock, M. (2005). Listen up, why good communication is good business. Wisconsin Business Alumni update.
Churchill, G. A. (1995). Marketing research: Methodological foundations (5th ed.). London: the Dryden Press.
Dawes, J. (1999). The relationship between subjective and objective company performance measure in research. Further empirical evidence. Marketing Bullion, 10, 65 – 75.
Deshpande, R., & Farley. J. U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness and firm performance in international research odyssey. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 3 – 22.
Hall, J. & Lockshin, L. (2000). Using means – and chains for analysis occasions – not buyers. Australasion Martketing Journal, 8(1), 45 – 54.
Harris, L. C. & Ogbonna, E. (2001). Leadership style and market orientation: an empirical study. European Journal of marketing, 35 (5/6), 744 – 764.
Kotler, P. (2004). Marketing management. New Delhi: Pearson Education.
Pearson, G. J. (1993). Business orientation – cliché or substance? Journal of Marketing Management, 9 (3), 233 – 243.
Stewart, D. W. (1981). The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 51 – 62.
Wright, M., & Kearns, (1998). Progress in marketing knowledge. Journal of Empirical Generalisation in Marketing Science, 3, 1 – 21.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship. permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead to wider dissemination of the work. continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY license receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
