Learning Outcomes: How does the Experimentation of the MEA and STAD Models?

  • Ulfah Hidayati UIN Raden Intan Lampung
    (ID)
  • Devi Sela Eka Selvia UIN Raden Intan Lampung
    (ID)
  • Nurul Azizah UIN Raden Intan Lampung
    (ID)
  • Baharudin UIN Raden Intan Lampung
    (ID)
  • Beti Susilawati UIN Raden Intan Lampung
    (ID)
Keywords: Learning Models, MEA, STAD, Learning Outcomes, Islamic Education (PAI)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the MEA and STAD learning models on student learning outcomes in Religious Education (PAI) at SMA Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung. The research uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The sampling technique employed is probability sampling, specifically simple random sampling, where classes are randomly selected without considering their grade levels. The instrument used in this study is a multiple-choice test. Class X.1 serves as the control group, while classes X.5 and X.7 are the experimental groups. The results of this study show that the normality test yielded a value of 0.00 < 0.05, indicating that the data is not normally distributed. Therefore, a non-parametric test was conducted using the Mann-Whitney test, with results of 1.00 for the MEA model and 0.007 for the STAD model. The homogeneity test yielded a result of 0.407 > 0.05, indicating that the data is homogeneous. The hypothesis test using one-way ANOVA yielded a result of 0.376 > 0.05, so it can be concluded that H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected, meaning there is no significant effect of the MEA and STAD learning models on student learning outcomes. This study offers a new contribution by comparing two learning models that have been more commonly applied to mathematics subjects rather than PAI. Additionally, this research responds to issues in education such as low learning motivation and the lack of innovative teaching models, with the hope of contributing to the field of education, particularly in Religious Education (PAI).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, & Linda Yurike Susan Sumendap. (2022). 164 Model Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Pusat Penerbitan LPPM.
Ananda, D., Muhyani, M., & Suhandi, T. (2020). Systematic Literature Review Implementasi Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 10(2), 106–119.
Ananda, N. R. (2022). the Effectiveness of Lms Assisted Stad Learning Model on Social Studies Learning Outcomes for Elementary School: Literature Review. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 14(1), 59–74.
Anditiasari, N., Pujiastu, E., & Susilo, B. E. (2021). Systematic literature review: pengaruh motivasi terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika , 12(2), 236–248.
Apriatni, S., Nindiasari, H., & Sukirwan, S. (2022). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Knisley Terhadap Kemampuan Matematis Peserta Didik: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 3059–3077.
Dhamayanti, P. V. (2022). Systematic literature review: Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran inkuiri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 3(2), 209–219.
Eriza, R., & Selaras, G. H. (2023). Literature Review: Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Divisions (Stad) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Bioedukasi, 6(2), 285–292.
Fahrurrozi, & Edwita, T. B. (2022). Model-Model Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Berpikir Kritis di Sekolah Dasar. UNJ PRESS.
Fatirani, H. (2022). Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Pada Sistem Ekskresi Manusia. Penerbit P4I.
Firsya Yunia Amanda, Nurul Ashiqin, & Gusmaneli Gusmaneli. (2024). Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Blended Learning. Journal Innovation In Education, 2(2), 21–36.
Fitrianna, A. Y., & Dahlan, J. A. (2022). Means End Analysis (MEA) Learning Model in Developing Algebraic Reasoning Ability: a Literature Study. Jurnal Analisa, 8(1), 1–10.
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. In Journal of Computers in Education (Vol. 8, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hidayat, A. W., Surya, A., Sukarno, & Poerwanti, J. I. S. (2020). The Effect of Means Ends Analysis Model on Reasoning Skills of Planes. 397(22), 629–633.
Jus, J. (2024). Systematic Literature Review (Slr): Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Murid Sd. Jurnal Ilmiah Pena, 16(01), 16–20.
Kamila, S. H., & Waluya, S. B. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Model Pembelajaran Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional OPPSI 2023, 2, 8–21.
Kusmawan, U., Wiralodra, U., & Java, W. (202 C.E.). Critical review: The Effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions vs Numbered Heads Together Cooperative Learning in Improving Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Abilities. 15(1), 606–614.
Mahmudi, I., Athoillah, M. Z., Wicaksono, E. B., & Kusuma, A. R. (2022). Taksonomi Hasil Belajar Menurut Benyamin S. Bloom. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 2(9), 3507–3514.
Mulasari, M. R., Wulandari, I. G. A. A., & Putra, M. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Means Ends Analysis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SD. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 358–366.
Munawir, M., Lailun Nurul Arofah, & Sari, R. A. P. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keguruan, 9(1), 49–54.
Nabilah, S., Pujiastuti, H., & Syamsuri, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review : Literasi Numerasi dalam pembelajaran Matematika, Jenjang, Materi, Model dan Media Pembelajaran. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 2436–2443.
Najah, E. F., & Nurhalimah, A. (2023). Implementasi Teori Belajar Matematika terhadap Keberhasilan Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Seminar Nasional Paedagoria, 3, 98–104.
Nani Widiyawati. (2019). Integrasi Domain Afektif Taksonomi Blom Dengan pendidikan Spiritual. Journal Educative : Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 121.
Ni’amah, K., & M, H. S. (2021). Teori Pembelajaran Kognivistik dan Aplikasinya dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Raushan Fikr, 10(2), 204–217.
Nurfaizah, R. (2023). Penggunaan model pembelajaran tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) dalam pembelajaran psikologi. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 1(3), 259–268.
Pahru, S., Gazali, M., Pransisca, M. A., Marzuki, A. D., & Nurpitasari, N. (2023). Teori Belajar Kognitivistik Dan Implikasinya Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 1070–1077.
Pamungkas, J., Harun, & Manaf, A. (2023). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Group Contrasts: Learning Model Based on Local Cultural Wisdom and Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 53–70.
Pebrianti, P., & Irawati, W. (2024). Peran Guru Dalam Menggunakan Metode Demonstrasi Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Siswa Terhadap Konsep Pembelajaran Sains. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 4(1), 34–54.
Pipit Muliyah, Dyah Aminatun, Sukma Septian Nasution, Tommy Hastomo, Setiana Sri Wahyuni Sitepu, T. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Kompetensi Dasar Pengukuran Luas Ruang Masing-Masing Elemen Dekorasi Interior Rumag Tinggal, Perkantoran Dan Ruang Publik. Journal GEEJ, 7(2).
Pitri, A., Ali, H., & Anwar Us, K. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pendidikan Islam: Paradigma, Berpikir Kesisteman Dan Kebijakan Pemerintah (Literature Review Manajemen Pendidikan). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 2(1), 23–40.
Pratama, Y., Sariyatun, S., & Joebagio, H. (2017). The development of Means-Ends Analysis and Value Clarification Technique Integration Model to explore the local Wisdom in Historical Learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(2), 179–187.
Purnamasari, S., Turmudi, T., & ... (2023). Meta-Analysis Study: Effect of Means Ends Analysis (MEA) Model on Student’s Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills. Edumaspul: Jurnal …, 7(1), 1816–1825.
Putra, N., Hakim, S., & Sandika, S. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Means Ends Analysis (MEA) terhadap Kemampuan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa. Educatoria : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 20–29.
Rofiq, Z. (2024). Critical Review Kurikulum Nasional Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam Kelas X Semester Ii Madrasah Aliyah Dengan Analisa Taksonomi Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–8.
Rositasari, T., Larasati, F., & Saraswaty, D. R. (2020). The influence of means ends analysis (MEA) model on grammar achievement. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 95–102.
Ryan, G. V., Callaghan, S., Rafferty, A., Higgins, M. F., Mangina, E., & McAuliffe, F. (2022). Learning Outcomes of Immersive Technologies in Health Care Student Education: Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), 1–13.
Salisah, S. K., Darmiyanti, A., & Arifudin, Y. F. (2024). Peran Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Membentuk Karakter Peserta Didik di Era Digital: Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 36–42.
Sari, P. M., & Musdi, E. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran.Kooperatif Tipe Stad Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas Viii Smp. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Penelitian Matematika, 12(3), 242–247.
Siti, L. (2023). Model Pembeajaran Discovery Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Tedc, 17(1), 76.
Sofia Ayu Lestari, L., Kustiawan, A., & Ilmiyati, N. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (Stad) Secara Daring Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 3(1), 177–182.
Somayana, W. (2020). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa melalui Metode PAKEM. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(3), 350–361.
Stiawan, D., Wardono, W., Waluya, B., & Prabowo, A. (2024). Penurunan Kecemasan Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran: Systematic Literature Review. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 596–602.
Sudarman, S. W., & Linuhung, N. (2021). Penerapan pembelajaran MEA (Means-End Analysis) berbantuan schoology untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 32–40.
Sutanto, S. (2024). Transformasi Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar: Peran Guru dalam Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum Merdeka di Indonesia. Jurnal Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 69–76.
Sutiah. (2020). Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Nlc.
Tsabita, D. W., Zulkarnain, F. O., Adi, I. G. A. R. K. D., & Evaldus, J. D. (2023). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 3(2), 466–474.
Wijayama, B. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw dan STAD Terhadap Pencapaian Karakter dan Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa. Cahya Ghani Recovery.
Yandi, A., Nathania Kani Putri, A., & Syaza Kani Putri, Y. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengarui Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik (Literature Review). Jurnal Pendidikan Siber Nusantara, 1(1), 13–24.
Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
Ulfah Hidayati, Devi Sela Eka Selvia, Nurul Azizah, Baharudin and Beti Susilawati (2024) “Learning Outcomes: How does the Experimentation of the MEA and STAD Models?”, Inspiratif Pendidikan, 13(2). doi: 10.24252/ip.v13i2.52874.
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 50 times